In Re: Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability Litigation

Filing 4098

STIPULATION RELATED TO NJ MTBE SETTLEMENTS: Plaintiffs and defendant CITGO Petroleum Corporation ("Citgo") entered into a settlement agreement (the "Citgo Settlement") that was submitted to this Court for approval; and certain non-settling defendants objected to the Citgo Settlement; and the Court denied the motion to approve the Citgo Settlement; THEREFORE, in response to the Court's decision and the objections of the non-settling defendants, Plaintiffs and Defendants stipulate and agree as follows: Plaintiffs will enter into the stipulation attached hereto as Exhibit A for any defendant that enters into a written settlement with Plaintiffs in this litigation, notice of which is provided to the Court by the Plaintiffs and settling defendant(s) prior to the first of either (a) commencement of opening statements in the first trial of one or more of the Trial Sites identified in CMO 107 in Phase 1 of this litigation, or (b) the Court issuing an order that forecloses such a trial... All Defendants that previously objected to the Citgo Settlement in the past hereby expressly withdraw their objections to such settlement, and as further set forth herein. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 10/1/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:00-cv-01898-SAS-DCF, 1:08-cv-00312-SAS(ja) Modified on 10/2/2014 (ja).

Download PDF
. -- ·- --'---- _.. _- __ ------·-···-· - ,.----_..__. -- irlJ.si)c SDNY . \ii DOC 1vu.~i "'U" iLiN"T · \\ rJ...BCTttON1CALLY FILED . UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK !\ l)()C #: \,L_ i fJt<rll Ffl.hD: IN RE METHYL TERTIARY BUTYL ETHER ("MTBE") PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION I :JDµ p~ ~ ~ l I I i Master File No. 1:00-1898 MDL 1358 (SAS) M21-88 This document relates to: New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, et al. v. Atlantic Richfield Co., et al., 08 Civ. 00312 STIPULATION RELATED TO NJ MTBE SETTLEMENTS SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, U.S.D.J.: WHEREAS Plaintiffs and defendant CITGO Petroleum Corporation ("Citgo'') entered into a settlement agreement (the "Citgo Settlement") that was submitted to this Court for approval; and WHEREAS certain non-settling defendants objected to the Citgo Settlement; and WHEREAS the Court denied the motion to approve the Citgo Settlement; THEREFORE, objections of in the response to non-settling the Court's defendants, decision and Plaintiffs the and Defendants stipulate and agree as follows: 1. Plaintiffs will enter into the stipulation attached hereto as Exhibit A for any defendant that enters into a written settlement with Plaintiffs in this litigation, notice of ::·.·. ·.. :.·.. ·:.·: which is provided to settling defendant (s) the ·~. ', '.- ~ ..:-;:·..;.··. ··~·-:·: Court by prior to the the Plaintiffs and first of either (a) commencement of opening statements in the first trial of one or more of the Trial Sites identified in CMO 107 in Phase 1 of this litigation, or (b) the Court issuing an order that forecloses such a trial. 2. Defendants will not object to, submit comments on, or in any way impede, any settlement that has been or will be reached in this litigation, so long as: (i) the material terms (other than the settlement value) of such settlement do not materially differ from the Citgo Settlement(attached hereto as Exhibit settlement is less than $3 million, or B), if such the George E. Warren Corporation settlement (attached hereto as Exhibit C) ; and (ii) notice of the settlement is provided to the Court by Plaintiffs and the settling defendant(s) prior to the first of (a) commencement of opening statements in the first trial of one or more of the Trial Sites in Phase 1 of this litigation, or (b) the Court issuing an order that the Citgo forecloses such a trial. 3. All Defendants Settlement that previously objected to in the past hereby expressly withdraw their objections to such settlement. 4. This Stipulation is expressly contingent and effective only upon the approval by the Court of the Citgo Settlement. FOR PLAINTIFFS: COHN LIFLAND PEARLMAN JOHN J. HOFFMAN HERRMANN & KNOPF LLP ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY Special Counsel to the Attorney General BY: BY: Gwen Farley, Deputy Attorney General FOR NON-SETTLING DEFENDANTS: BY: Peter John Sacripanti James A. Pardo Stephen J. Riccardulli Lisa A. Gerson LLP Madison Avenue York, New York 10173 (212) 547-5400 (212) 547-5444 McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY 340 New T: F: Counsel for Exxon Mobil Corporation, ExxonMobil Oil Corporation, Mobil Corporation, and on behalf of Non-Settling Defendants listed on Attachment 1 Sep 30 2014 12:32 Fax:609-984-9315 P.02 ····.··:'.;··. 4. This Stipulation is expressly contingent and effect.ive only upon the approval by the Court of the Citgo Settlement. FOR PLAINTIFFS: COHN LIFLAND PEARLMAN HERRMANN & KNOPF LLP JOEN .J. l!OFFMAN ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY Special Counsel to the General Atto~ney BY: BY: [,eonard Z. Kaufmann, A Member of the Firm FOR NON-SETTLING DEPENDANTS: BY: Peter Johri Sacripanti James A. Pardo Stephen J. Riccardulli Lisa A. Gerson MCDlffiMoTT WILL & EMERY LLP 340 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10173 T: F: (212) 547-5400 (212) 547-5444 Coilllsel ror Bxxon Mobil Corporation, ExxonMobil Oil Corporation, Mobil Corporation, and on behalf of Non-Settling Defendants listed on Attachment l Gwen Farley, Deputy Attorney --,--·-.- -·-· 4. This Stipulation is expressly contingent and effective only upon the approval by the Court of the Citgo Settlement. FOR PLAINTIFFS: COHN LIFLAND PEARLMAN HERRMANN & KNOPF LLP J'OHN J. HOFFMAN ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY Special Counsel to the Attorney General BY: BY: Leonard Z. Kaufmann, A Member of the Firm FOR NON-SETTLING DEFENDANTS: BY: James Stephen J. Riccardulli Lisa A. Gerson McDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP 340 Madison Avenue New York, New York 10173 T: (212) 547-5400 F: (212} 547-5444 Counsel for Exxon Mobil Corporation, ExxonMobil Oil Corporation, Mobil Corporation, and on behalf of Non-settling Defendants listed on Attachment 1 SO ORDERED: Gwen Farley, Deputy Attorney General A'l"l'ACHMENT 1 Atlantic Richfield Company BP America, Inc. BP Amoco Chemical Company BP Amoco Corporation BP Products North America, Inc. Chevron Corporation Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Kewanee Industries, Inc. Unocal Corporation Coastal Eagle Point Oil Company El Paso Corporation ConocoPhillips Company Crown Central Petroleum Corporation CUmberland Farms, Inc. Gulf Acquisition LLC Gulf Oil Limited Partnership Duke Energy Merchants, LLC Equilon Enterprises, LLC Motiva Enterprises, LLC Shell Oil Company Shell Oil Products Company LLC Shell Trading (US) Company ExxonMobil Corporation ExxonMobil Oil Corporation Mobil Corporation Getty Petroleum Marketing, Inc. Lukoil Americas Corporation Getty Properties Corp. Lyondell Chemical Company Lyondell-Citgo Refining, LP Rosemore Inc. Sunoco, Inc . Sunoco, Inc. (R&M) Total Petrochemicals USA, Inc. Vitol S.A. ·-·····- ·- .. .. • .:. . ···;:_·· .;_.:--.- -- ., ::. ··<·-.-=-~--.-· -.---":·..-::;::": _.___ ---~.:::~ - -- :. _ : .. - · . - : : : · : : : :.. ·--··•·"·,0-1 •. · ...... :.t~·-·- .. ~.-•. :...... .:. ::·::::::·::~?::~~-'.~,?;.-:.~:;;;!_~:~;-:;~~·:,_ .-· ··--· ·_. :'· . -~ ~?~:· ·-·:.-:-:._~_::~.-:;:-~~---:~.-- _ .::~ ::~:~-~-: ··········.·· ~-:-~-- -:·:·:.:--.. ." ~-::. ;- :-.:.~..:_·._:_.._-.-.:_::~--- .···- ::: __ .____·:..:.::.: .. _._._____ ._ - ._ . '; -. ·:= -.- . - ' .- -: , .:. - ::-· --:. -;:- . ---- ·-- :- i EXHIBIT ''A'' : ------------------------------ - UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE METHYL TERTIARY BUTYL ETHER ("MTBE") PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION Master File No. 1:00-1898 MDL 1358 (SAS) M21-88 This document relates to: New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, et al. v. Atlantic Richfield Co., et al., 08 Civ. 00312 STIPULATION RELATED TO SETTLEMENT WITH [NAME OF SETLLING DEFENDANT] ONLY SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, U.S.D.J.: WHEREAS {"[SHORT Plaintiffs FORM FOR and SETTLING settlement agreement defendant DEFENDANT {SETTLING NAME]") (the "[SETTLING DEFENANT] DEFENDANT] entered into a Settlement"} that is being submitted to this Court for approval; and WHEREAS certain non-settling defendants have previously objected to the settlement in this case between defendant CITGO Petroleum Corporation and Plaintiffs; and WHEREAS the Court denied the motion to approve the settlement between CITGO Petroleum Corporation and Plaintiffs; THEREFORE, previous in response to the Court' s decision objections of the non-settling defendants, stipulate and agree as follows: and the Plaintiffs . ---···---·. ··--·· ·-··--· ____.________ .::.· ... ·---- ··-··--; 1. ·- Plaintiffs agree to reduce any judgment, and if necessary, agree not to seek to collect or to collect in this litigation, captioned New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. Atlantic Richfield Co., MDL 1358, 08 Civ. 00312 (S.D.N.Y.), or in any subsequent judicial, administrative or other action that arises as a result of the claims asserted in this litigation, any portion of any judgment under the New Jersey Spill Compensation and Control Act, N.J.S.A. 58:10- 23.11 to -23.24 ("Spill Act"), that is allocated by the fact finder in this action to [SETTLING DEFENDANT] percentage of relative fault. based on its Plaintiffs further agree that in any trial of this action, the trier of fact shall determine [SETTLING DEFENDANT] 's percentage of relative fault for Spill Act claims in the same manner and in the same form of trial verdict as defendants, for common as if law claims and [SETTLING DEFENDANT] as for all other had remained a non- settling defendant. 2. Except as provided in paragraph Stipulation is strictly limited to the 1 above, this [SETTLING DEFENDANT] Settlement in this litigation and in no other way limits or reduces the liability of any responsible party. 3. only This Stipulation is expressly contingent and effective upon the approval DEFENDANT] Settlement. by the Court of the (SETTLING COHN LIFLAND PEARLMAN JOHN J. HOFFMAN HERRMANN & KNOPF LLP ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY Special Counsel to the Attorney General BY: BY: Leonard Z. Kaufmann, A Member of the Firm Gwen Farley, Deputy Attorney General

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?