Spinelli, et al v. The City of New York, et al
Filing 51
OPINION. Plaintiffs, in a letter dated November 5, 2010, ask the Court to reconsider its finding that Olinville, not Spinelli, was the licensee for the firearm dealer's license. Plaintiffs cite Title 38 of the of the Rule of the City of New Yor k § 1-02, which provides that a principal agent "refers to the person who is in active charge of the dealership" and that "Dealer's licenses are issued to individuals." The licenses at issue plainly state that Olinville Arms, Inc. was the licensee. Spinelli was listed on one license as Olinville's sole officer, which may be construed as listing Spinelli as the principal agent. This fact leans toward allowing Plaintiff to present her claim for emotional damages. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 11/8/10) (djc)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
