W.W. Polymers, Inc. v. Shinkong Synthetic

Filing 42

ENDORSEMENT: Plaintiff moves [dkt. no. 35] for reconsideration of the Court's order of August 24, 2009, denying Plaintiffs sub silentio post hoc request for yet another extension of the time for filing an expert report and striking its request f or damages. The motion is denied because Plaintiff has pointed to no "matters or controlling decisions which counsel believes the court has overlooked." Local Civil Rule 6.5. If the Court were to reconsider the August 24 order, it would be adhered to. "[D]iscovery orders are meant to be followed. A party who flouts such orders does so at its peril." Bambu Sales v. Ozak Trading, 58 F.3d 849, 854 (2d Cir. 1995) (internal quotation marks omitted). Here, the Court was simply en forcing its order of April 30, 2009 [dkt.no. 32] that "[n]o further extensions will be granted." As noted in the August 24 order, "no further extensions means no further extensions." (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 9/18/2009) Copies Faxed By Chambers (jpo)