Raedle v. Credit Agricole Indosuez et al
Filing 76
OPINION: For the reasons stated above, plaintiffs motion for pre-judgment interest is denied. Plaintiffs motion for post-verdict interest is granted. Plaintiffs motion for costs is denied without prejudice to renew his application in conformity with Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d) and Local Civil Rule 54.1(a). Parties to submit judgment on notice. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 6/11/2010) (jpo)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
