Deen et al v. New School University

Filing 90

OPINION AND ORDER #97485: The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs leave to amend their consolidated amended complaint only insofar as they may replead diversity jurisdiction by filing their proposed second consolidated amended complaint with the Court. Plaintiff s shall do so no later than May 4, 2009, at 5:00 PM. For the (reasons stated above, the Court, in its March 31, 2009 Order (D.E. 84), denied New School's motion to dismiss in all respects. Insofar as New School moved to dismiss Plaintiffs' consolidated amended complaint because Plaintiffs inadequately plead diversity jurisdiction, the Court clarifies that New School's motion, (D. E. 79), is dismissed without prejudice, and with leave to refile if Plaintiffs do not file their proposed second consolidated amended complaint as ordered above. (Amended Pleadings due by 5/4/2009.) (Signed by Judge Kimba M. Wood on 4/29/09) (db) Modified on 4/30/2009 (db). Modified on 5/6/2009 (mro).

Download PDF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?