The Authors Guild et al v. Google Inc.

Filing 896

NOTICE of Intent to Appear at the Feb. 18, 2010 Fairness Hearing. Document filed by Microsoft Corporation. (Rubin, Thomas)

Download PDF
The Author's Guild et al v. Google Inc. Doc. 896 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x The Authors Guild, Inc., Association of American : Publishers, Inc., Associational Plaintiffs, and : : Herbert Mitgang, Betty Miles, Daniel Hoffman, : Paul Dickson, Joseph Goulden, The McGraw-Hill : Companies, Inc., Pearson Education, Inc., Penguin : Group (USA) Inc., Simon & Schuster, Inc., and : John Wiley & Sons, Inc., individually and on : behalf of all others similarly situated, : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : : Google Inc., : : Defendant. : : ---------------------------------------------------------------x Case No. 05 CV 8136 (DC) MICROSOFT CORPORATION'S NOTICE OF INTENT TO APPEAR AT THE FEBRUARY 18, 2010 FAIRNESS HEARING Please take notice that Microsoft Corporation intends to appear at the Fairness Hearing in the above-captioned action, currently scheduled for February 18, 2010, to object to the Proposed Amended Settlement Agreement. Microsoft will appear through its attorneys Thomas C. Rubin, Charles B. Casper, and R. Montgomery Donaldson. I am admitted to practice in this Court. Charles B. Casper and R. Montgomery Donaldson are admitted pro hac vice (Docs. No. 740, 741). Respectfully submitted, Date: February 1, 2010 MICROSOFT CORPORATION By: /s/ Thomas C. Rubin Thomas C. Rubin (TR8845) Chief Counsel for Intellectual Property Strategy Law and Corporate Affairs One Microsoft Way Redmond, WA 98052 (425) 882-8080 MONTGOMERY, McCRACKEN, WALKER & RHOADS, LLP Charles B. Casper 123 South Broad Street Philadelphia, PA 19109 (215) 772-1500 Admitted pro hac vice R. Montgomery Donaldson 1105 N. Market Street Suite 1500 Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 504-7800 Admitted pro hac vice Counsel for Microsoft Corporation 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?