Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. Steinbeck et al
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 13 Motion for Summary Judgment. Because defendant failed to demonstrate the absence of a genuine issue regarding performance ofcontractual condition, the record does not reflect whether Penguin's obligatio n to pay ever matured. See Restatement of Law (Second) of Contracts § 225(1) (1981) ("Performance of a duty subject to a condition cannot become due unless the condition occurs or its non-occurrence is excused."). Defendant has made an insufficient showing that there are no triable issues of fact and that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on his breach of contract counterclaim. Defendant's motion for summary judgment on his counterclaim against Penguin is denied. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 3/31/2009) (tve)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?