Philip Morris USA Inc. v. Veles Ltd. et al

Filing 112

ORDER that plaintiff's request that an order of default be entered against defendants and is granted. Plaintiff's motion that this Court strike the answer filed on behalf of and is denied as moot. (Signed by Judge George B. Daniels on 4/20/09) (dle)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x PH ILIP MORRIS USA INC., : Plaintiff, : : - against : : VELE S LTD., AFOLINA INC., XENON LTD., LO LA D EZ NANA, MR-PILOT PLUS SRL., DIG IT A L MANDATE ESTABLISHMENT, OOO IN T E LKO M , RU HOLDING, VLADISLAV RU ZO V , BLITZ LTD., ALL OF OUR BUTTS, CIG A RE T T ES AMERICA, DISCOUNTC IG A R E T T E S.C O M , AND NA T IO N WID E S H O P P IN G CA RT .CO M , : : : : : : OR D E R 06-cv-2988(GBD) Defendants. : x GE O R G E B. DANIELS, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Philip Morris USA, Inc. seeks an order striking the answer filed on behalf of defendants and and entering a default judgment against those defendants for their failure to comply with the order issued by Magistrate Judge Theodore H. Katz on July 30, 2008. Plaintiff also asks this Court to enter a permanent injunction against,, and certain individuals plaintiff believes to be affiliated with those corporations. In his order, Magistrate Judge Katz advised defendants that if counsel failed to appear on their behalf by August 4, 2008, "a default will be entered" against them. See Order, Docket No. 85. No attorney filed a notice of appearance on defendants' behalf, and the deadline to do so has

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?