Viacom International, Inc. et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al
ORDER After examining the redactions proposed by the defendants with respect to confidential personal and business information contained in submissions filed in support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motions for Partial Summary Judgment, Viacom's Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, Class Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, Defendants' Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, Viacom's Reply in Support of Viacom's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, and Class Plaintiffs' Reply Motion for Partial Summary Judgment - together with the reasons given for continued confidential treatment of the designated material, I have determined that the protection of the value of this private, proprietary and commercially sensitive information to its owners clearly outweighs any countervailing public interest in its disclosure to the general public and to competitors, and justifies its redaction, together with personally identifiable matter such as addresses, telephone and account numbers, family and personal affairs and similar information, publicly filed and disclosed. So ordered. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 8/4/2010) (jmi)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?