Anna Sui Corp. v. Forever 21, Inc. et al

Filing 4

AMENDED COMPLAINT amending 1 Complaint, against Jin Sook Chang, Gadzooks, Inc., Gerald P. Szczepanski, John Does, Forever 21, Inc., Forever 21 Retail, Inc., Forever 21 Logistics, LLC, Do Won Chang.Document filed by Anna Sui Corp. Related document: 1 Complaint, filed by Anna Sui Corp. (jco)

Download PDF
Anna Sui Corp. v. Forever 21, Inc. et al Doc. 4 Case 1:07-cv-03235-TPG Document 4 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 1 of 23 DONOVAN & YEE LLP The Soho Building 110 Greene Street New York, New York 10012 (212) 226-7700 MARYA LENN YEE (MY 4608) ANDREA L. CALVARUSO (AC 0514) Attorneys for Plaintiff Anna Sui Corp. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------x ANNA SUI CORP., x x Plaintiff, x x -v.x x x FOREVER 21, INC., FOREVER 21 RETAIL, INC., FOREVER 21 LOGISTICS, LLC, x DO WON CHANG, JIN SOOK CHANG, x GADZOOKS, INC., GERALD P. SZCZEPANSKI x and JOHN DOES 1 to 20, x x Defendants. x ------------------------------------------------------------------------x FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 07 Civ. 3235 Plaintiff Anna Sui Corp. ("Plaintiff" or "Sui") alleges the following for its complaint against Defendants Forever 21, Inc., Forever 21 Retail, Inc., Forever 21 Logistics, LLC, Do Won Chang, Jin Sook Chang (collectively hereinafter referred to as the "F21 Defendants"), Gadzooks, Inc., Gerald P. Szczepanski (collectively referred to as the "Gadzooks Defendants"), and 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:07-cv-03235-TPG Document 4 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 2 of 23 Defendants John Does 1 to 20 (each a "Defendant" and all defendants together collectively referred to as "Defendants"), on personal knowledge and on information and belief, as appropriate: THE PARTIES 1. Anna Sui Corp. is a New York corporation with a principal place of business and executive offices at 250 West 39th Street, New York, New York 10018. 2. Upon information and belief, Defendant Forever 21, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with a principal place of business and executive offices at 2001 S. Alameda Street, Los Angeles, California 90058. Forever 21, Inc. does business in this District with store locations throughout the State and City of New York, and via its website at www.forever21.com. Its stores bear various names including, but not limited to, FOREVER 21, FOREVER XXI, XXI, XXX FOREVER and others. 3. Upon information and belief, Defendant Forever 21 Retail, Inc. is a California corporation with a principal place of business and executive offices at 2001 S. Alameda Street, Los Angeles, California 90058. Forever 21 Retail, Inc. does business in this District with store locations throughout the State and City of New York. 4. Upon information and belief, Defendant Forever 21 Logistics, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business and executive offices at 9 East Lookerman Street, Dover, Delaware 19901. Forever 21 Logistics, LLC is doing business in the State of New York and in this District. 5. The F21 Defendants own hundreds of retail outlets in the United States and are one of the fastest growing retail chains catering to young fashion looks. Their store locations include stores outside the U.S. in the Middle and Far East all managed from their California offices. 2 Case 1:07-cv-03235-TPG Document 4 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 3 of 23 6. Upon information and belief, Defendant Do Won Chang is an individual and the co- founder and Chief Executive Officer of F21 Defendant companies. Defendant Do Won Chang is a dominant and controlling force in the infringing activities complained of herein. 7. Upon information and belief, Defendant Jin Sook Chang is an individual and the co- founder of and Head Buyer for the F21 Defendant companies. Defendant Jin Sook Chang is a dominant and controlling force in the infringing activities complained of herein. 8. Upon information and belief, Defendant Gadzooks, Inc. is a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Defendant Forever 21, Inc. with a principal place of business at 4121 International Parkway, Carrollton, Texas 75007-1907. Gadzooks, Inc. has scores of retail locations in the U.S. featuring trendy clothing for young women. On further information and belief, Gadzooks, Inc. does business in this District. 9. Upon information and belief, Defendant Gerald P. Szczepanski is an individual and the Chief Executive Officer of the Gadzooks Defendant. On further information and belief, Defendant Szczepanski is a dominant and controlling force in the infringing activities complained of herein. 10. Upon information and belief, Defendants John Does 1 to 20 are businesses and individuals in the business of producing for and/or supplying the F21 Defendants and Gadzooks Defendants with the infringing product complained of herein, and profiting thereby. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 11. Sui brings this action under the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S. C. §§ 101, et seq. (the "Copyright Act"), the Lanham Trade-Mark Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051 et seq. (the "Lanham Act"), and the laws of the State of New York, including §§ 349 et seq. of the New York General Business Law, against Defendants for, inter alia, willful infringement of Sui's registered and common law copyrights, unfair competition and false designation of origin or sponsorship, and 3 Case 1:07-cv-03235-TPG Document 4 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 4 of 23 unfair competition under New York State law. 12. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to Sections 501, et seq. of the Copyright Act, Section 1125(a) of the Lanham Act and 28 U.S.C. § 1331, 1332 and 1338(a) over causes of action alleging copyright infringement, unfair competition and false designation of origin. Supplemental jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1338 and 1367 over causes of action created by the laws of the State of New York because these claims arise as part of the same case or controversy. 13. Venue is proper in this District under 28 U.S.C. § 1391 as the Defendants conduct business in this District, a substantial portion of the activity of which Plaintiff complains took place in this District, Defendants are subject to personal jurisdiction in this District, and the individual Defendants are conscious, active and dominant forces in the infringing activity complained of herein. BACKGROUND 14. Anna Sui is a leading designer of women's fashions and a fixture of the American fashion world. For over 25 years Anna Sui has been identified as one of the "coolest" names in American fashion, known for her signature head-to-toe designs. Ms. Sui's designs mix vintage styles with current cultural iconography to produce hip and exuberant original clothes, a "pastiche of hip and haute styles" (New York Times). Her runway shows are one of the most anticipated each season. Time magazine has named Ms. Sui one of "This Decade's Top 5 Fashion Icons." 15. In 1992, Ms. Sui opened the first of her own stores and in 1993 she won the prestigious CFDA Perry Ellis Award for New Fashion Talent. For at least the past 15 years, Ms. Sui and her designs have been regularly featured in the premier pages of the industry's leading journals, including but not limited to Vogue, Elle and Women's Wear Daily. Plaintiff's business, under 4 Case 1:07-cv-03235-TPG Document 4 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 5 of 23 Ms. Sui's leadership and inspiration, has grown to now include distribution in over 300 sales outlets in 30 countries; accessory, shoe, cosmetic and fragrance lines; and the licensing of the ANNA SUI brand and Sui designs to various products, from a limited collection of Mattel BARBIE dolls to a limited collection of Samsung phones. Her designs are regularly featured on leading celebrity talents such as Christina Ricci, Cher, Naomi Campbell, Lindsay Lohan, Maria Sharapova and Courtney Love. 16. Plaintiff Sui was incorporated March 26, 1981 and holds all right, title and interest to the ANNA SUI name and Ms. Sui's designs. Sui's business growth and leadership in the industry has been regularly heralded in the general and business press, including in such leading journals as The New York Times, Time and Forbes. Sui has received enormous unsolicited media coverage and is widely admired as a cutting edge designer. Sui is now a fashion leader in the design, development, manufacture and sale of women's apparel, accessories, cosmetics and related goods (the "Sui Products"). 17. Sui is the owner of numerous trademark registrations for its mark ANNA SUI as well as numerous copyright registrations filed with the U.S. Copyright Office for its unique and original print and fabric designs (the "Sui Designs"). Sui Products bearing the Sui Designs have become widely recognized for their distinctive and original style, and for their high quality of manufacture. Authentic Sui Products bearing the Sui Designs bear the ANNA SUI mark. The current Sui Products collection is available at www.annasui.com and at its flagship store at 113 Greene Street, New York, New York in this District. 18. As a result of the quality and reputation of the Sui Products and the desirability and recognition of the Sui Designs, Sui has achieved an outstanding reputation in the marketplace and among consumers. The Sui Products and the Sui Designs have come to symbolize the reputation and goodwill of Ms. Sui and her company, Plaintiff Sui. 5 Case 1:07-cv-03235-TPG Document 4 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 6 of 23 19. Sui Products are sold in ANNA SUI boutiques and in hundreds of high-end retail outlets in the U.S. and throughout the World, including such high-end department stores as NeimanMarcus, Bergdorf Goodman, Henri Bendel and Saks Fifth Avenue. Sui's advertising and promotions are well known for their unique presentation and style, tailored to each season's Sui Designs. Sui Designs and Sui's marketing efforts and the quality of its Sui Products have resulted in hundreds of millions of dollars in sales per annum for Sui Products. 20. At certain times each year, Sui and the entire high-end fashion industry present their designs for the coming season to the trade. These collections are shown for the first time each year at the New York Spring and Fall fashion weeks at Bryant Park. The new collections receive widespread media attention and are a centerpiece of fashion and lifestyle news for weeks. Fashion critics publish daily reports of the collections and remark on the designs they believe will prove most popular with consumers and the fashion press. DEFENDANTS' INFRINGING ACTIVITIES 21. A few months ago, it was brought to the attention of Sui that the F21 Defendants were selling and offering for sale in their stores numerous women's clothing items bearing a striking similarity to the Sui Products featured at the most recent New York Fashion Week shows. Indeed, much of the collection displayed by Sui at the shows had itself not yet been finally manufactured and Sui's own distribution of some of its newest Sui Products not yet released. Upon investigation, Sui determined that Defendants had copied numerous of Sui's most recent Sui Designs and that the F21 Defendants had made an ongoing practice of such copying from a number of recent collections, since at least late 2005. Such copying was clearly blatant and intentional. 6 Case 1:07-cv-03235-TPG Document 4 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 7 of 23 22. A total of at least 17 copied Sui Designs were identified and a Complaint was prepared and filed with this Court. Plaintiff first however contacted the F21 Defendants regarding these infringements. Though settlement discussions ensued, in the following weeks Plaintiff continued to discover additional infringements of its Sui Designs in the F21 Defendants' stores and on their website, all to the frustration of Sui and the hoped-for settlement. 23. In recent weeks, it was brought to the attention of Sui that the Gadzooks Defendants were selling and offering for sale in their stores numerous women's clothing items bearing a striking similarity to certain Sui Products. Many of these infringements also bore a striking similarity to infringements previously found at the F21 Defendants' stores and regarding which the F21 Defendants had been notified by Sui of its claim to copyright. Sui's investigations of these further infringements revealed that Defendant Gadzooks, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Defendant Forever 21, Inc. 24. The infringing activity by all Defendants continues. Though Defendants contend their goods are manufactured by a variety of vendors, the designs copied and the resulting garments are suspiciously well-coordinated to create a collection. A detailing of the Sui Designs copied, particularly when viewed in the context of the similarity of the overall garment designs in which the infringing designs are incorporated, makes evident that Defendants' copying is willful as a matter of law. 7 Case 1:07-cv-03235-TPG Document 4 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 8 of 23 25. For example, in 2005, Sui created the Sui Design "Medallions," an enlarged sample of which is annexed hereto as Exhibit 1-A. "Medallions" was incorporated prominently as an alternating print in an original Sui Product. Photos of the Sui Product bearing the "Medallions" Sui Design and Defendants' infringing product are annexed hereto as Exhibit 1-B. Defendants have copied "Medallions" as the alternating print with "Stained Glass Border," referenced in Paragraph 26 below, in the dress shown in Exhibit 2-B and bearing an overall striking similarity to the entire design of a Sui Product. "Medallions" is the subject of U.S. Copyright Reg. No. VA 1-391-590. A true and accurate copy of the Certificate of Registration for "Medallions" is annexed hereto as Exhibit 1-C. 26. In 2005, Sui also created the Sui Design "Stained Glass Border," an enlarged sample of which is annexed hereto as Exhibit 2-A. "Stained Glass Border" was incorporated prominently in an original Sui Product. Defendants have copied "Stained Glass Border" as one of two prints in a dress bearing an overall striking similarity to the entire design of a Sui Product. Photos of the Sui Product bearing the "Stained Glass Border" Sui Design, together with "Medallions" referenced in Paragraph 25 above, and Defendants' infringing product are annexed hereto as Exhibit 2-B. "Stained Glass Border" is the subject of U.S. Copyright Reg. No. VA 1-391-586. A true and accurate copy of the Certificate of Registration for "Stained Glass Border" is annexed hereto as Exhibit 2-C. 27. In 2006, Sui created the Sui Design "Roses Stripe Border," an enlarged sample of which is annexed hereto as Exhibit 3-A. "Roses Stripe Border" was incorporated prominently in numerous original Sui Products. Defendants have copied "Roses Stripe Border" in numerous garments bearing overall striking similarity to the entire design of the Sui Products. Photos of the Sui Products bearing the "Roses Stripe Border" Sui Design and Defendants' infringing products are annexed hereto as Exhibit 3-B. "Roses Stripe Border" is the subject of U.S. Copyright Reg. No. VA 1-391-591. A true and accurate copy of the Certificate of Registration for "Roses Stripe Border" is annexed hereto as Exhibit 3-C. 8 Case 1:07-cv-03235-TPG Document 4 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 9 of 23 28. In 2006, Sui also created the Sui Design "Popcorn Floral," an enlarged sample of which is annexed hereto as Exhibit 4-A. "Popcorn Floral" was incorporated prominently in numerous original Sui Products. Defendants have copied "Popcorn Floral" in numerous garments bearing overall striking similarity to the entire design of the Sui Products. Photos of the Sui Products bearing the "Popcorn Floral" Sui Design and Defendants' infringing products are annexed hereto as Exhibit 4-B. "Popcorn Floral" is the subject of U.S. Copyright Reg. No. VA 1-391-588. A true and accurate copy of the Certificate of Registration for "Popcorn Floral" is annexed hereto as Exhibit 4-C. 29. In 2006, Sui also created the Sui Design "All Over Trees," an enlarged sample of which is annexed hereto as Exhibit 5-A. "All Over Trees" was incorporated prominently in numerous original Sui Products. Defendants have copied "All Over Trees" in numerous garments bearing overall striking similarity to the entire design of the Sui Products. Photos of the Sui Products bearing the "All Over Trees" Sui Design and Defendants' infringing products are annexed hereto as Exhibit 5-B. "All Over Trees" is the subject of U.S. Copyright Reg. No. VA 1-391-589. A true and accurate copy of the Certificate of Registration for "All Over Trees" is annexed hereto as Exhibit 5-C. 30. In 2005, Sui created the Sui Design "Butterfly Border Stripe," an enlarged sample of which is annexed hereto as Exhibit 6-A. "Butterfly Border Stripe" was incorporated prominently in numerous original Sui Products. Defendants have copied "Butterfly Border Stripe" in a garment bearing overall striking similarity to the entire design of the Sui Products. Photos of the Sui Products bearing the "Butterfly Border Stripe" Sui Design and Defendants' infringing product are annexed hereto as Exhibit 6-B. "Butterfly Border Stripe" is the subject of U.S. Copyright Reg. No. VA 1-391-593. A true and accurate copy of the Certificate of Registration for "Butterfly Border Stripe" is annexed hereto as Exhibit 6-C. 9 Case 1:07-cv-03235-TPG Document 4 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 10 of 23 31. In 2005, Sui also created the Sui Design "Dotted Rose Border," an enlarged sample of which is annexed hereto as Exhibit 7-A. "Dotted Rose Border" was incorporated prominently in an original Sui Product. Defendants have copied "Dotted Rose Border" in a garment bearing overall striking similarity to the entire design of the Sui Product. Photos of the Sui Product bearing the "Dotted Rose Border" Sui Design and Defendants' infringing product are annexed hereto as Exhibit 7-B. "Dotted Rose Border" is the subject of U.S. Copyright Reg. No. VA 1391-587. A true and accurate copy of the Certificate of Registration for "Dotted Rose Border" is annexed hereto as Exhibit 7-C. 32. In 2005, Sui also created the Sui Design "Shadow Leaf Border," an enlarged sample of which is annexed hereto as Exhibit 8-A. "Shadow Leaf Border" was incorporated prominently in numerous original Sui Products. Defendants have copied "Shadow Leaf Border" in numerous garments bearing overall striking similarity to the entire design of the Sui Products. Photos of the Sui Products bearing the "Shadow Leaf Border" Sui Design and Defendants' infringing products are annexed hereto as Exhibit 8-B. "Shadow Leaf Border" is the subject of U.S. Copyright Reg. No. VA 1-391-595. A true and accurate copy of the Certificate of Registration for "Shadow Leaf Border" is annexed hereto as Exhibit 8-C. 33. Sui is also the owner of the design "Embroidered Rose Bouquets," an enlarged sample of which is annexed hereto as Exhibit 9-A. "Embroidered Rose Bouquets" was incorporated prominently in numerous original Sui Products. Defendants have copied "Embroidered Rose Bouquets" in numerous garments bearing overall striking similarity to the entire design of the Sui Product. Photos of the Sui Products bearing the "Embroidered Rose Bouquets" Sui Design and Defendants' infringing product are annexed hereto as Exhibit 9-B. "Embroidered Rose Bouquets" is the subject of U.S. Copyright Reg. No. VA 1-391-627. A true and accurate copy of the Certificate of Registration for "Embroidered Rose Bouquets" is annexed hereto as Exhibit 9C. 34. Copying by Defendants of the Sui embroidery designs has been both by copying the 10 Case 1:07-cv-03235-TPG Document 4 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 11 of 23 embroidery and as reproduction of the embroidery as a printed design. In 2006, Sui created the design "Embroidered Floral Vines," an enlarged sample of which is annexed hereto as Exhibit 10-A. "Embroidered Floral Vines" was incorporated prominently in an original Sui Product. Defendants have copied the "Embroidered Floral Vines" embroidery as the print in a garment bearing overall striking similarity to the entire design of the Sui Product. Photos of the Sui Product bearing the "Embroidered Floral Vines" Sui Design and Defendants' infringing product are annexed hereto as Exhibit 10-B. "Embroidered Floral Vines" is the subject of U.S. Copyright Reg. No. VA 1-391-620. A true and accurate copy of the Certificate of Registration for "Embroidered Floral Vines" is annexed hereto as Exhibit 10-C. 35. In 2005, Sui created the Sui Design "Floral Leaves Border," an enlarged sample of which is annexed hereto as Exhibit 11-A. "Floral Leaves Border" was incorporated prominently in numerous original Sui Products. Defendants have copied "Floral Leaves Border" in an overwhelming number of garments bearing overall striking similarity to the entire design of the Sui Products. Photos of the Sui Products bearing the "Floral Leaves Border" Sui Design and Defendants' infringing products are annexed hereto as Exhibit 11-B. On information and belief, these are sold under various labels and brands owned by the F21 Defendants, including "XXI" and at various stores, including the retailer REFERENCE. "Floral Leaves Border" is the subject of U.S. Copyright Reg. No. VA 1-391-594. A true and accurate copy of the Certificate of Registration for "Floral Leaves Border" is annexed hereto as Exhibit 11-C. On information and belief, when a thorough review is made of Defendants' conduct, it will be evident that many of the copied Sui Designs have been copied into full and complete collections of coordinated goods to create comprehensive Sui-styled seasons as was done with "Floral Leaves Border." 11 Case 1:07-cv-03235-TPG Document 4 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 12 of 23 36. In 2006, Sui also created the Sui Design "Tea Party Border," an enlarged sample of which is annexed hereto as Exhibit 12-A. "Tea Party Border" was incorporated prominently in an original Sui Product. Defendants have copied "Tea Party Border" in numerous garments bearing overall striking similarity to the entire design of the Sui Product. Photos of the Sui Product bearing the "Tea Party Border" Sui Design and Defendants' infringing products are annexed hereto as Exhibit 12-B. "Tea Party Border" is the subject of U.S. Copyright Reg. No. VA 1-391-592. A true and accurate copy of the Certificate of Registration for "Tea Party Border" is annexed hereto as Exhibit 12-C. 37. In 2006, Sui created the Sui Design "Circle Scallop Border," an enlarged sample of which is annexed hereto as Exhibit 13-A. "Circle Scallop Border" was incorporated prominently in numerous original Sui Products. Defendants have copied "Circle Scallop Border" in numerous garments bearing overall striking similarity to the entire design of the Sui Product. Photos of the Sui Products bearing the "Circle Scallop Border" Sui Design and Defendants' infringing products are annexed hereto as Exhibit 13-B. "Circle Scallop Border" is the subject of U.S. Copyright Reg. No. VA 1-404-808. A true and accurate copy of the Certificate of Registration for "Circle Scallop Border" is annexed hereto as Exhibit 13-C. 38. In 2004, Sui created the Sui Design "Battenburg Embroidery," an enlarged sample of which is annexed hereto as Exhibit 14-A. "Battenburg Embroidery" was incorporated prominently in an original Sui Product. Defendants have copied "Battenburg Embroidery" in a garment bearing overall striking similarity to the entire design of the Sui Product. Photos of the Sui Product bearing the "Battenburg Embroidery" Sui Design and Defendants' infringing product are annexed hereto as Exhibit 14-B. "Battenburg Embroidery" is the subject of a pending application with the U.S. Copyright Office. A true and accurate copy of the application to register "Battenburg Embroidery" is annexed hereto as Exhibit 14-C. 12 Case 1:07-cv-03235-TPG Document 4 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 13 of 23 39. In 2005, Sui created the Sui Design "Floral Vines Border," an enlarged sample of which is annexed hereto as Exhibit 15-A. "Floral Vines Border" was incorporated prominently in numerous original Sui Products. Defendants have copied "Floral Vines Border" in numerous garments bearing overall striking similarity to the entire design of the Sui Products. Photos of the Sui Product bearing the "Floral Vines Border" Sui Design and Defendants' infringing product are annexed hereto as Exhibit 15-B. "Floral Vines Border" is the subject of U.S. Copyright Reg. No. VA 1-386-724. A true and accurate copy of the Certificate of Registration for "Floral Vines Border" is annexed hereto as Exhibit 15-C. 40. In 2006, Sui created the Sui Design "Circles and Block Stripe Border," an enlarged sample of which is annexed hereto as Exhibit 16-A. "Circles and Block Stripe Border" was incorporated prominently in an original Sui Product. Defendants have copied "Circles and Block Stripe Border" in a garment bearing overall striking similarity to the entire design of the Sui Product. Photos of the Sui Product bearing the "Circles and Block Stripe Border" Sui Design and Defendants' infringing product are annexed hereto as Exhibit 16-B. "Circles and Block Stripe Border" is the subject of U.S. Copyright Reg. No. VA 1-402-667. A true and accurate copy of the Certificate of Registration for "Circles and Block Stripe Border" is annexed hereto as Exhibit 16-C. 41. At the time of the filing of the original Complaint in this Action Sui had spent a mere few weeks in its investigations of the F21 Defendants' activities and found infringements of at least 16 copyrightable Sui Designs reproduced in almost twice as many infringing garments being sold by the F21 Defendants. More recently, and notwithstanding ongoing settlement discussions, additional infringements were identified. 13 Case 1:07-cv-03235-TPG Document 4 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 14 of 23 42. For example, in 2006, Sui created the Sui Design "Poppy Scarf," an enlarged sample of which is annexed hereto as Exhibit 17-A. "Poppy Scarf" was incorporated prominently in an original Sui Product. Defendants have copied "Poppy Scarf" in a garment bearing overall striking similarity to the entire design of the Sui Product. Photos of the Sui Product bearing the "Poppy Scarf" Sui Design and Defendants' infringing product are annexed hereto as Exhibit 17B. "Poppy Scarf" is the subject of U.S. Copyright Reg. No. VA 1-402-672. A true and accurate copy of the Certificate of Registration for "Poppy Scarf" is annexed hereto as Exhibit 17-C. 43. In 2006, Sui created the Sui Design "Wallpaper Foulard Border," an enlarged sample of which is annexed hereto as Exhibit 18-A. "Wallpaper Foulard Border" was incorporated prominently in numerous original Sui Products. Defendants have copied "Wallpaper Foulard Border" in numerous garments bearing overall striking similarity to the entire design of the Sui Product. Photos of the Sui Products bearing the "Wallpaper Foulard Border" Sui Design and Defendants' infringing products are annexed hereto as Exhibit 18-B. "Wallpaper Foulard Border" is the subject of U.S. Copyright Reg. No. VA 1-402-680. A true and accurate copy of the Certificate of Registration for "Wallpaper Foulard Border" is annexed hereto as Exhibit 18C. 44. Similarly, in 2006 Sui created the Sui Design "Cabbage Roses Bandana," an enlarged sample of which is annexed hereto as Exhibit 19-A. "Cabbage Roses Bandana" was incorporated prominently in an original Sui Product. Defendants have copied "Cabbage Roses Bandana" in numerous garments bearing overall striking similarity to the entire design of the Sui Product. Photos of the Sui Product bearing the "Cabbage Roses Bandana" Sui Design and Defendants' infringing products are annexed hereto as Exhibit 19-B. "Cabbage Roses Bandana" is the subject of U.S. Copyright Reg. No. VA 1-402-677. A true and accurate copy of the Certificate of Registration for "Cabbage Roses Bandana" is annexed hereto as Exhibit 19-C. 14 Case 1:07-cv-03235-TPG Document 4 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 15 of 23 45. In 2004, Sui created the Sui Design "Scattered Daisies," an enlarged sample of which is annexed hereto as Exhibit 20-A. "Scattered Daisies" was incorporated prominently in an original Sui Product. Defendants have copied "Scattered Daisies" in a garment bearing overall striking similarity to the entire design of the Sui Product. Photos of the Sui Product bearing the "Scattered Daisies" Sui Design and Defendants' infringing product are annexed hereto as Exhibit 20-B. "Scattered Daisies" is the subject of subject of U.S. Copyright Reg. No. VA 1-403-778. A true and accurate copy of the Certificate of Registration for "Scattered Daisies" is annexed hereto as Exhibit 20-C. 46. And, in 2005, Sui created the Sui Design "Embroidered Leaf Border," an enlarged sample of which is annexed hereto as Exhibit 21-A. "Embroidered Leaf Border" was incorporated prominently in an original Sui Product. Defendants have copied "Embroidered Leaf Border" in a garment bearing overall striking similarity to the entire design of the Sui Product. Photos of the Sui Product bearing the "Embroidered Leaf Border" Sui Design and Defendants' infringing product are annexed hereto as Exhibit 21-B. Significantly, the Defendants' product is not yet available for sale. A few weeks ago, when updating its website, the F21 Defendants featured the garment on their homepage; it was clearly intended to flatter the F21 Defendants as being on the cutting edge of fashion even though the product was not yet available. "Embroidered Leaf Border" is the subject of a pending application with the U.S. Copyright Office. A true and accurate copy of the application to register "Embroidered Leaf Border" is annexed hereto as Exhibit 20-C. 15 Case 1:07-cv-03235-TPG Document 4 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 16 of 23 47. Defendants' intention to infringe is beyond question. Even in the instance of less copyrightable designs, Defendants have sought out Sui Designs to reproduce for their stores. On information and belief, Defendants, to fill out their line of copies of copyrighted Sui Products, also copied other Sui Products in order to present a more comprehensive collection and unfairly compete with Sui. For example, in 2006, Sui created the Sui Product named "Striped Shirt." Photos of the Sui Product bearing the "Striped Shirt" Sui Design and Defendants' copy are annexed hereto as Exhibit 22. On information and belief, there are many instances of such copying of collections and coordinated Sui Products by the F21 Defendants. 48. The infringements extend to other businesses controlled by the F21 Defendants. For example, on information and belief, the same infringing goods identified in this Action are sold by the F21 Defendants in its offshore locations with all profits therefrom being made by the F21 Defendants. Similarly, their online sales have reached extraterritorial jurisdictions. 49. The Gadzooks Defendants are also selling infringements of the Sui Designs. For example, Plaintiff recently identified Gadzooks sales of the Sui Design identified in Exhibit 11 of this Amended Complaint, "Floral Leaves Border." A sample of the infringing Gadzooks product is annexed hereto as Exhibit 23-A. For the Court's convenience, annexed as Exhibit 23B is a copy of the original Sui Design "Floral Leaves Border." Similarly, the Gadzooks Defendants are selling infringements of the Sui Design "Scattered Daisies," identified in Exhibit 21 of this Amended Complaint. A sample of the infringing Gadzooks product is annexed hereto as Exhibit 24-A. For the Court's convenience, annexed as Exhibit 24-B is a copy of the original Sui Design "Scattered Daisies." 50. On information and belief, the Gadzooks Defendants are also selling infringements of Sui Designs that Plaintiff has not found sold at any of the F21 Defendants' locations. On further information and belief, the profits therefrom benefit the F21 Defendants. 16 Case 1:07-cv-03235-TPG Document 4 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 17 of 23 51. Without authorization or license from Sui, Defendants have flagrantly copied and reproduced for sale or offered for sale, and are marketing, promoting, displaying and distributing women's apparel nearly identical to the copyrightable designs of Sui (the "Infringing Products") in direct competition with Sui. In most instances, Defendants have painstainkingly reproduced the same colorways, the same construction detail and the same scale of design in each Infringing Product. In some instances, Defendants' Infringing Products have appeared in the marketplace in advance of the release of the Sui Products from which they were copied, tarnishing Sui's reputation as a fashion leader and the exclusivity of the Sui Designs that Sui customers covet. 52. On information and belief, Defendants' conduct has been willful, with knowledge of Sui's rights and/or in reckless disregard of them, and Defendants are unlawfully profiting from the unauthorized reproduction of the copyrighted Sui Designs. FIRST CLAIM Willful Copyright Infringement in Violation of 17 U.S.C. § 101, et seq. 53. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 52, as if fully set forth herein. 54. 55. Sui is the owner of the Sui Designs and the copyrights embodied therein. Defendants are not authorized by Sui to reproduce, display, offer for sale or sell copies of the Sui Designs. 56. Sui has developed a reputation and valuable goodwill in the unique and original appearance of the Sui Designs and the Sui Products. 57. As a result of Defendants' willful and infringing conduct, Sui has suffered damages in an amount not yet known but to be proven at a trial of this action. 58. Sui will continue to be damaged by Defendants' unauthorized conduct unless they are enjoined by this Court from any further manufacture, display, promotion, distribution, offer for sale or sale of the Infringing Products. 17 Case 1:07-cv-03235-TPG Document 4 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 18 of 23 59. 60. Sui has no adequate remedy at law. In light of the foregoing, Plaintiff is entitled to an injunction prohibiting Defendants from using the Sui Designs or any designs substantially similar thereto, a recall of the Infringing Products, and to recover from Defendants all damages that Plaintiff has sustained and will sustain, and all gains, profits and advantages obtained by Defendants as a result of their actions in an amount not yet known and to be determined at a trial of this action, including statutory damages and attorneys fees pursuant to Section 505 et seq. of the Copyright Act in all instances applicable. SECOND CLAIM Unfair Competition and False Designation of Origin or Sponsorship in Violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) 61. Plaintiff repeats and alleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 60, as if fully set forth herein. 62. The Infringing Products are nearly identical to the Sui Products bearing the Sui Designs that are solely associated with Sui. Defendants' sales and offer for sale of the Infringing Products is likely to cause confusion in the marketplace as to the source or sponsorship of the Infringing Products. 63. Defendants have unfairly competed with Sui and continue to unfairly compete with Sui. As recently as last week, the F21 Defendants featured a new garment on the homepage of their website intended to attract potential purchasers by demonstration of the currency of the F21 Defendants' styling. On information and belief, the dress so exhibited was not even available for sale and would not be available for weeks to come. The dress so exhibited was yet another infringement of a Sui Design (see Exhibit 23). 18 Case 1:07-cv-03235-TPG Document 4 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 19 of 23 64. Defendants have misrepresented the source of the Infringing Products. Plaintiff has been harmed and will continue to be irreparably harmed as a result of Defendants' willful and unlawful actions unless Defendants are enjoined from their unlawful conduct. 65. 66. Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law. In light of the foregoing, Plaintiff is entitled to an injunction prohibiting Defendants from using any Sui Designs or any designs substantially similar thereto, a recall of the Infringing Products, and to recover from Defendants all damages that Plaintiff has sustained and will sustain, and all gains, profits and advantages obtained by Defendants as a result of their infringing acts alleged above, in an amount not yet known, and the costs of this action pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a). 67. Further, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 1117(b), Plaintiff is entitled to three times the amount of the above profits or damages, whichever is greater, and its attorney's fees and costs. THIRD CLAIM Unlawful Trade Practices in Violation Of New York General Business Law 68. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 67, as if fully set forth herein. 69. Defendants' knowing unauthorized use of the Sui rights is in direct competition with the Sui Products. 70. Defendants' use of imitations of the Sui Designs is likely to deceive consumers into believing that the Infringing Products are associated with or authorized by Sui when such is not the case. 71. public. 19 Defendants' activities are recurring and are likely to continue to deceive the consuming Case 1:07-cv-03235-TPG Document 4 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 20 of 23 72. Plaintiff has been harmed and will continue to be irreparably harmed as a result of Defendants' unlawful actions unless Defendants are enjoined from their unlawful conduct. 73. 74. Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law. In light of the foregoing, Plaintiff is entitled to an injunction prohibiting Defendants from using the Sui Designs or any designs substantially similar thereto, a recall of the Infringing Products, and to recover from Defendants all damages that Plaintiff has sustained and will sustain, and all gains, profits and advantages obtained by Defendants as a result of their actions in an amount not yet known and to be determined at a trial of this action. FOURTH CLAIM Common Law Unfair Competition in Violation of New York State Law 75. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 74, as if fully set forth herein. 76. The name and mark ANNA SUI has developed enormous goodwill in the marketplace and has come to be associated with the Sui Products and the Sui Designs. Defendants' unauthorized use of the Sui Designs is calculated to permit Defendants to palm off their Infringing Products as Sui Products, all to the detriment of Sui. 77. Defendants have infringed knowingly and with total disregard for the fame and reputation of Sui and the Sui rights with the intention of trading on the goodwill and reputation associated therewith. Defendants' continued unauthorized use of the Sui Designs will continue to mislead the relevant purchasers into assuming a connection between Defendants and Sui when none exists. 78. Defendants' actions have caused Sui damage and are likely to continue to cause Sui damage unless enjoined. 20 Case 1:07-cv-03235-TPG Document 4 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 21 of 23 79. 80. Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law. In light of the foregoing, Plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief prohibiting Defendants from using the Sui Designs or any designs substantially similar thereto, a recall of the Infringing Products and damages attributable to such infringing use in an amount not yet known but to be determined at a trial of this action. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Anna Sui Corp. demands judgment against Defendants on the foregoing claims as follows: A. That Defendants, their agents, servants, employees, licensees, sponsors, associates, and attorneys, and all persons acting by, through, or in active concert with any of them, be permanently enjoined from using the Sui Designs or any designs substantially similar thereto in any manner, including but not limited to manufacture, development, promotion, advertising, distribution, offer for sale or sale of goods bearing the Sui Designs, or otherwise infringing the Sui Products; B. That Defendants, their agents, servants, employees, licensees, sponsors, associates, and attorneys, and all persons acting by, through, or in active concert with any of them, be ordered to recall, remove and return to Sui for destruction all goods, advertisements, web materials, or other products bearing infringements of the Sui Designs or any designs substantially similar thereto; C. That Defendants, their agents, servants, employees, licensees, sponsors, associates, and attorneys, and all persons acting by, through, or in active concert with any of them, be enjoined from otherwise infringing the Sui rights; D. That Defendants, their agents, servants, employees, licensees, sponsors, associates, and attorneys, and all persons acting by, through, or in active concert with any of them, be enjoined from otherwise unfairly competing with Sui; E. That Defendants be made to fully account to Plaintiff for all gains, profits and advantages 21 Case 1:07-cv-03235-TPG Document 4 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 22 of 23 derived from Defendants' wrongful acts by a payment of statutory damages under the Copyright Act including payment for willful infringement, reimbursement of its attorneys fees to Plaintiff, and actual and consequential damages and punitive damages for its willful infringement and unfair competition; F. That Plaintiff recover from Defendants all of Defendants' profits and all damages, including lost profits, sustained by Plaintiff as a result of Defendants' wrongful acts, and such other compensatory damages as the Court determines to be fair and appropriate, pursuant to the Copyright Act, the Lanham Act and New York State law; G. That identical remedies be imposed on Defendants offshore sales under this Court's proper exercise of extraterritorial jurisdiction; H. That Plaintiff be awarded all the statutory damages, costs, disbursements and attorneys' fees incurred by Plaintiff in bringing this claim; and I. Such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper. 22 Case 1:07-cv-03235-TPG Document 4 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 23 of 23 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Pursuant to Rule 38(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff hereby demands a jury trial on all triable issues raised in this action. Dated: New York, New York June 26, 2007 DONOVAN & YEE LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff Anna Sui Corp. By /s Marya Lenn Yee / MARYA LENN YEE (MY 4608) ANDREA L.CALVARUSO (AC 0514) The Soho Building 110 Greene Street, Suite 700 New York, New York 10012 (212) 226-7700 23

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?