The Football Association Premier League Limited et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al

Filing 122

ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Louis L. Stanton from Andrew H. Schapiro dated 4/15/2009 re: Counsel for defendant You Tube writes requesting that the Court confirm that the 225 hours allotted to YouTube for depositions of the "Collective Plaintiff" applies only to depositions of Viacom, Premier Lounge, and Bourne; that the depositions of the 15 plaintiffs added to this case after the Rule 16(b) Order was entered are not included within the 225 hours allotted to YouTube for depositions of the "Collective Plaintiffs"; and that the parties should negotiate in good faith towards an allocation of remaining hours for depositions of the latter-added plaintiffs, on the basis of whatever is realistically needed. ENDORSEMENT: That is correct. (Signed by Judge Louis L. Stanton on 4/15/2009) (tve)

Download PDF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?