The Football Association Premier League Limited et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al

Filing 142

MOTION for Reconsideration re; 140 Endorsed Letter,. Document filed by The Music Force LLC, Cal IV Entertainment, LLC, Cherry Lane Music Publishing Company, Inc., The Football Association Premier League Limited, Robert Tur, National Music Publishers' Association, The Rodgers & Hammerstein Organization, Edward B. Marks Music Company, Freddy Bienstock Music Company, Alley Music Corporation, X-Ray Dog Music, Inc., Federation Francaise De Tennis, The Music Force Media Group LLC, Sin-Drome Records, Ltd., Murbo Music Publishing, Inc., Bourne Co..(Solomon, Louis)

The Football Association Premier League Limited et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al

Doc. 142

PROSKAUER ROSE LLP Louis M. Solomon 1585 Broadway New York, NY 10036 [phone] [e-mail] - and BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER & GROSSMANN LLP Max W. Berger 1285 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10019 [phone] [e-mail] Attorneys for Lead and Named Plaintiffs and the Prospective Class UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION PREMIER LEAGUE LIMITED, ET AL., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, - against YOUTUBE, INC., ET AL., Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : :

Case No.: 07-CV-3582 (LLS) ECF CASE NOTICE OF MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT, upon the accompanying Memorandum, and all prior pleadings and proceedings herein, Named Plaintiff X-Ray Dog Music, Inc. ("XRD") hereby moves this Court, before the Honorable Louis L. Stanton, at the United States Court House, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York, for reconsideration of the Court's Memorandum Endorsement entered on October 28, 2009 concerning XRD's identifications of works-in-suit and infringing instances of those works, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6.3 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) and 60(b), and for such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper.

Dockets.Justia.com

The basis for this motion is that Class Plaintiffs have agreed to Defendants' October 15, 2009 proposal to extend the fact discovery deadline in this case by more than 30 days to December 18, 2009, an intervening event that affects the timing of XRD's identifications of works-in-suit, and that had not occurred at the time of XRD's application to the Court. PLEASE ALSO TAKE NOTICE THAT, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 and Local Civil Rules 6.1(b) and 6.4, Defendants shall serve any opposing papers by November 20, 2009, and Plaintiffs shall serve any reply papers by November 27, 2009, or as otherwise agreed to by the parties or by order of the Court. Dated: New York, New York November 6, 2009 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Louis M. Solomon Louis M. Solomon William M. Hart Hal S. Shaftel PROSKAUER ROSE LLP 1585 Broadway New York, NY 10036 Telephone: [phone] Email: [e-mail] - andMax W. Berger John C. Browne BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER & GROSSMANN LLP 1285 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10019 Telephone: [phone] Email: [e-mail]

2

TO: Andrew H. Schapiro, Esq. A. John P. Mancini, Esq. Matthew D. Ingber, Esq. MAYER BROWN LLP 1675 Broadway New York, NY 10019-5820 Telephone [phone] Facsimile [phone] David H. Kramer, Esq. Michael H Rubin, Esq. Bart E. Volkmer, Esq. WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone [phone] Facsimile [phone] Attorneys for Defendants