Psenicska v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation et al
Filing 21
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons stated above, the Agreements in each of the above-captioned actions is unambiguous and, based on the language of those Agreements, these Plaintiffs may not now maintain a defense of fraud in the inducement. The Agreements are thus enforceable, and the provisions contained therein waiving Plaintiffs' respective rights to bring any and all claims against Defendants with respect to Borat prevent the instant actions. Therefore, Defendants' motion to dismiss in Psenicska v. Twentieth Century Fox Corp., 07 Civ. 10972 [dkt. no. 9], Streit v. Twentieth Century Fox Corp., 08 Civ. 1571 [dkt. no. 9J and Martin v. Mazel, 08 Civ. 1828 [dkt. no. 12] are all hereby GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court shall mark each action closed and deny all pending motions as moot.. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 9/3/2008) (jpo)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
