Psenicska v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation et al

Filing 7

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Todd Lewis served on 1/3/2008, answer due 2/1/2008. Service was accepted by Benjamin Reder. Document filed by Michael Psenicska. (Levine, Peter)

Download PDF
Psenicska v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation et al U,f:£4 Frorn:Ke.stiti9 3 Walker £129645508 To: 17144470334 P.4": Doc. 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MICHAEL P S E N I C S K A , Case No. 07 CIV 10972 Plaintiff, AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE -againstTWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION, cl M., Defendants. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) S.S. : COUNTY OF ORANGE ) JOHN GONZALEZ, being duly sworn deposes and says that he is over the age of eighteen, is an agent of KEATING & WALKER ATTORNEY SERVICE, and is not a party to this action. That on the 14th day of December, 2007, at approximately 12:05 p.m. , deponent served a true copy of the S'ummons in a Civil Case, Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet, Procedures for Electronic Case Filing dated March 6, 2003, Guidelines for Electronic Case Filing dated December 1, 2003 and 3rd Amended Instructions fox- Filing an Electronic Case or Appeal dated June upon Todd Lewis at 421 South Beverly Drive, Beverly Hills, California by personally delivering and leaving the same with Benjamin Reder, a person of suitable age and discretion at that address who stated that he was authorized to accept service on behalf of Todd Lewis. At the time of service deponent asked if Todd Lewis is in active military service for the United States or for the State in any capacity whatsoever and received a negative/poeitivo reply. Benjamin Reder is a white male approximately 55 years of age, stands approximately 5 feet, 8 inches tall, weighs approximately 17 8 pounds with gray hair. State of California, County of Orange Subscribed & sworn to (or affirmed) Before me this g t S day of December, 2007, by JOHN GONZALEZ, personally known to me to be the person who appeared before me. JOHN G SANDY M. GELNAW Commission # 1655591 Notary Public - California Orange County MyComm. Expires Mar 31.2010 Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MICHAEL PSENICSKA, -againstT W E N T I E T H CENTURY FOX FILM C O R P O R A T I O N , eta}., Defendants. -X ) S .s. : C O U N T Y OF N E W YORK ) J O H N J. WALKER, being duly sworn deposes and says that he i s over the age of e i g h t e e n , is an e m p l o y e e of KEATING & W A L K E R A T T O R N E Y S E R V I C E , and is not a p a r t y to this action. T h a t on the 3rd day of January, 2 0 0 8 , in order to complete t h e service initiated on 14th d a y of D e c e m b e r , 2007 by John G o n z a l e z upon t h e D e f e n d a n t , Todd L e w i s , deponent served a t r u e copy of the t h e Summons in a Civil C a s e , C o m p l a i n t , Civil C o v e r S h e e t , Procedures for Electronic C a s e F i l i n g dated March 6, 2 0 0 3 , Guidelines for Electronic Case F i l i n g dated December 1 , 2003 and 3rd Amended Instructions for F i l i n g a n Electronic C a s e o r Appeal dated J u n e 7 , 2004 by enclosing a true copy t h e r e o f in a securely sealed and postpaid w r a p p e r with the w o r d s "PERSONAL and CONFIDENTIAL" w r i t t e n o n the s a m e , and not i n d i c a t i n g o n the outside that it is from an attorney, and d e p o s i t i n g the same into an official depository maintained by t h e Government of the United S t a t e s , County of N e w York and S t a t e of N e w York, addressed as f o l l o w s : S T A T E OF N E W YORK Plaintiff, Case No. 07 CIV 10972 A F F I D A V I T O F SERVICE T o d d Lewis One America Productions, Inc. c / o Benjamin Reder 4 2 1 South Beverly Drive - 8th Floor B e v e r l y H i l l s , California 90212 S w o r n to before m e this 1 1 t h d a y of J a n u a r y , 2008 J O H W ^ J . W A L K E R #847386 NoAary Public! : of New York <y Reg. No. OS Qualified in NeV-XfirJs'County Commission expires February 3,2010 Tfle

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?