Rubin v. MF Global, Ltd. et al

Filing 189

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Unopposed Motion for (I) Preliminary Approval of Settlement, (II) Certification of the Class for Purposes of Settlement, (III) Approval of Notice to the Class, (IV) Scheduling of a Final Approval Hearing, Supporting Memorandum of Law and Declaration served on Defendants on 8/11/2011. Document filed by Central States, Southeast, Southwest Areas Pension Fund, Iowa Public Employees' Retirement System, Policement's Annuity & Benefit Fund of Chicago, State-Boston Retirement System. (Rosen, Mark)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : : : : : : : : : : : MICHAEL RUBIN, Plaintiff, v. MF GLOBAL, LTD., et al., Defendants. Case No. 08 Civ. 2233 (VM) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 11th day of August 2011, I caused the foregoing (1) LEAD PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR (I) PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT, (II) CERTIFICATION OF THE CLASS FOR PURPOSES OF SETTLEMENT, (III) APPROVAL OF NOTICE TO THE CLASS, AND (IV) SCHEDULING OF A FINAL APPROVAL HEARING (2) LEAD PLAINTIFFS’ MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR (I) PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT, (II) CERTIFICATION OF THE CLASS FOR PURPOSES OF SETTLEMENT, (III) APPROVAL OF NOTICE TO THE CLASS, AND (IV) SCHEDULING OF A FINAL APPROVAL HEARING (3) DECLARATION OF MARK R. ROSEN IN SUPPORT OF LEAD PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR (I) PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT, (II) CERTIFICATION OF THE CLASS FOR PURPOSES OF SETTLEMENT, (III) APPROVAL OF NOTICE TO THE CLASS, AND (IV) SCHEDULING OF A FINAL APPROVAL HEARING to be filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, upon counsel for Defendants as shown on the attached pages. /s/ Mark R. Rosen Mark R. Rosen COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS Bernard W. Nussbaum David B. Anders Elaine P. Golin WACHTELL, LIPTON, ROSEN & KATZ 51 West 52nd Street New York, New York 10019-6150 Telephone: (212) 403-1000 Facsimile: (212) 403-2000 Attorneys for Defendants MF Global Ltd., Kevin R. Davis, Alison J. Carnwath, Christopher J. Smith, Christopher Bates, Henri J. Steenkamp, and Edward L. Goldberg Adam S. Hakki SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 Phone: (212) 848-4000 Fax: (212) 848-7179 Attorneys for Underwriter Defendants Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, UBS Securities LLC, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Goldman, Sachs & Co., Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, ABN AMRO Rothschild LLC, Banc of America Securities LLC, BMO Capital Markets Corp., HSBC Securities (USA) Inc., Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, Inc., Sandler O’Neill & Partners, L.P., Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, Blaylock & Co. Inc., Calyon Securities (USA) Inc., Chatsworth Securities LLC, CL King & Associates, Inc., Dowling & Partners Securities, LLC, E*TRADE Securities LLC, Fortis Securities LLC, Guzman & Co., ING Financial Markets, LLC, Jefferies & Co., Inc., Lazard Capital Markets LLC, M.R. Beal & Co., Mizuho Securities USA Inc., Muriel Siebert & Co., Inc., Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., Piper Jaffray & Co., Raymond James & Associates, Inc., RBC Capital Markets Corp., Robert W. Baird & Co. Inc., Samuel A. Ramirez & Co., Inc., SMH Capital Inc., Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., SunTrust Capital Markets, Inc. (n/k/a SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc.), The Williams Capital Group, L.P., Utendahl Capital Partners, L.P., Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, William Blair & Co., LLC Marilyn C. Kunstler BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 575 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022 Phone: (212) 446-2300 Fax: (212) 446-2350 Attorneys for Defendant Man Group plc Marshall H. Fishman KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP 1177 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036 Telephone: (212) 715-9100 Facsimile: (212) 715-8000 Attorneys for Defendant Amy S. Butte

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?