Anwar et al v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited et al

Filing 1131

ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Victor Marrero from Laurence E. Curran III dated 5/1/2013 re: Counsel for numerous Standard Chartered Plaintiffs, as well as in the capacity of designated representative of various other Standard Chartered Plaintiffs, to correct an oversight from my letter to the Court of April 19, 2013, regarding the effect of the Florida Supreme Court's recent March 7, 2013, ruling in Tiara Condo Ass'n Inc. v. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. SC10-1022, 2013 WL 828003 (Fla. 2013). In Appendix A to that letter, I inadvertently failed to include plaintiffs in the case of victor Jorge Saca et al vs. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited, 11-cv-3480 (VM)(SDNY), as represented by Sonn & Erez PLC. Those Plaintiffs should have been included in the Original request for a pre-conference motion to discuss the Plaintiffs' reconsideration request and to discuss their request for leave to replead Plaintiffs' dismissed negligence claims. Accordingly, I submit as an attachment hereto a revised Appendix A to so reflect the inclusion of the Saca Plaintiffs. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk of Court is to enter into the public record of this action the letter above submitted to the Court by Standard Chartered Plaintiffs. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 5/2/2013) (js)

Download PDF
- '- - - ,. - -. -- ­ CURRAN & ASSOCIATES Attornevs at Law 701 BrickeU A':-enuc - Suite 1550 Miami, Florida 33131 I I Telephone 305-777-0374 Telefax. 305-728·5288 i Emaille.c:urran@lecurrall.com i Laurence E. Curran HI May 1,2013 I By fax to (212) 801-6182 Honorable Victor i;J.arrero United States Disttict Judge Daniel Patrick Mo~nihan U.S. Courthouse 500 Pearl Street I New York, New york 10007-1312 I Re: A~war, et aL I 11. Fairfield Greenwich Limited, et aL, 09-cv-118 (VM)(mK) V,riou5 Cases (See Appendix "A") I Dear Judge Marr~o: I I write ~ counsel for numerous Standard Chartered Plaintiffs, as well as in the capacity of designated r~presentative of various other Standard Chartered Plaintiffs, to correct an oversight from letter to the Court of April 19, 2013, regarding the effect of the Florida I Supreme Court'$ recent March 7, 2013 ruling in Tiara Condo. Ass '11. lltc. v. Marsh & McLennan Companies, Ind. SClO-I022, 2013 WL 828003 (Fla. 2013). In Appendix A to that letter, J inadvertently f~led to include plaintiffs in the case of ViCfor Jorge Saca et ai. vs. St011dard Chartered BanI( International (Americas) Limited, 11 cv 3480 (VM) (SDNy), as represented by Sonn & Ercz ptC. Those Plaintiffs should have been included in the original request for a pre­ conference motiion to discuss the Plaintiffs' reconsideration request and to discuss their request I for leave to r~plead Plaintiffs' dismissed negligence claims. Accordingly, J submit as an attachment hereto a revised Appendix A to so refleCtthe inclusion of the Saca Plaintiffs. my d, Laurence E. Curran III artered cases Appendix A (May 1,2013) Curran &I: Associates ~ Cases covered by Stipulati.on and Order of September 4, 2!b12 (Doc 936). triple R Holdings Lid., el al. v. Standard Chartered Bank International ~Americas) Ltd., et al., No. ll-cv-897; (1) I (2) New Horizon Development Inc .. et al. v. Standard Charter'ed Bank international (Americas) LId., et al., No. l1-cv~898; (3) Salcar Ltd. v. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Ltd.. et hi... No. 11-cv-S99; ! (4) ~einaldo Ruiz v. Standard Chartered Bank International (America$) Ltd.. let aI, No. II-cv-900; I I (5) IIston Holdings Ltd., et al. v. Standard Chartered Bank lnrenwtional !(Americas) Ltd., el ai., No. 11-cv-90I~ (6) Ramiro Rendiles v. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Ltd., et al., No..II-cv-902: (7) Alberto Perez v. Standard Chartered Bank International (,4mericas) Ltd, et al., No. l1-cv-903; (8) ! Auburn Overseas Corp. v. StaPldard Chartered Bank International . (Americas) LId., et ai., No. ll-cv-904; (9) Interland Investments Ltd v. Standard Chartered Bank International i (Americas) Ltd, etal., No. II-cv-905; (10) I Velvor SA.. et al. v. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Ltd, et al., No. ll-cv-906; (11) 5C Investments Ltd. v. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Ltd., er ai., No. ll-cv-907; (12): Jorge Asen.~io v. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) LId. et ai.: No. l1-cv-908; (13) Bahia Del Rio. SA. v. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited, et al., No. 11-cv-5716; (14) Archangel Resources Limited, et ai. v. Srandard Chartered International (Americas) Limited, et af., No. l1-cv-571 7; (15) Blount Internat;onal v. Standard CharTered International (Americas) Limited, et al., No. 1l-cv-5719; 1 (16) Esther Diaz de Camara v. Standard Chartered Il1tefnarionaJ (Americas) Limited, et oJ" No. ll-cv-5720; I (17) Jphn. Paul DougherlY v. Standard Chartered International (Ameritas) ~imited, et ai., No. ll-cv-S721; (18) ~ose de Passos Vieira Lima v. Standard Chartered International (,Americas) Limited, et ai., No. l1-cv-5722; (19) Lucrecia Echeverri de Mata v. Standard Chartered Internatiol1al rAmerica.'~) Limited. et ai" No. ll-cv-5723; (20) !Eugene Thoma... Dougherty Novella v. Standard Chartered international I(Americas) Limited. eT a/., No. l1-cv-5724; (21) iRichmcm Company Ltd v. Standard Chartered International (Americas) Limited. et al., No. ll-cv-5725; (22) Juan Carlos Sabillon v. Stan.dard Chartered International (Americas) Limited, et ai" No. ll-cv-5726; (23) San Bias S.A., et af. v, Standard Chartered Internation.al (Americas) Ltd, No. l1-cv-5727; (24) Smerant Corp. v. Standard Chartered International (Americas) Limited et 01., No. ll-cv-5728; (25) Manuel Mantecon v. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited, et al. , No. ll-cv-5729; (26) Pharmafoods International C. v.. et al. v. Standard Chartered Bank Infernational (Americas) Limited et al., No. lI-cv-5729; (27) Tierra C v., et 01. v. Standard Chartered Ban.k international (Americas) Limited. et al., No. 11-cv-5731; (28) Jose Mizrahi v. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited, e/ al., No. ll-cv-6788; (29) Quiroz Stone v, Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited et a1.~ No. ll-cv-7651; (30)' Nautical Village, Inc. v. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited, No. ll-cv-7652; (31) Posita",o Investment Ltd v. Standard Chartered Bank lmernational (Americas) Ltd. et ai., No. ll-cv-8371: 2 (32) Maplehurst Holdings Ltd., v. Standard Chartered Bank International (4mericas) Limired, et al" No. l1-cv-83 72~ (33) Sam! O,'erseas Limited v. Standord Chartered Bank International ()(mericas) limited, et 01., No. 12-c'V-148~ (34) J?ebac Enterprises Ltd. v. Standard Chanered Bank In/emotional (Americas) Limited, et al., No. 12-cv-03969; and (35) lJrea international, Ltd., v. Srandard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited, et ai., No. 12-cv -3970; Curran & Associates - Cases Pending a Negotiated Stipulation affected by the Florida ELR and Court's prior Orders and Decisions (1) Emilio Diaz v. Standard Charlered Bank Internatirmai (Americas) Ltd, No. 12-cv-9146; (2) Bernardo J Rosental v. Standard Chartered Bank /nternalional (Americas) Ltd., No. 12-cv-9421; (3) Lyac Venture Corp. v. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Ltd. ~ No. 12-cv-9422; (4) Sara Boltvinikde Uziel v. Standard Chartered Bank International (America.') Ltd. No. 12-cv-9423; (5) TRE-C, S.A. v. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Ltd.• No. 12-cv-9425; (6) Skyworth Products Ltd. v. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Ltd., No. 12-cv-9427; Marko & Magolnick - Negligence Claims Dismissed Pursuant to September 12, 2012 Decision and Order (Doc 937): (1) Baymall Investments Ltd 1'. Standard Chartered Bank International (.4.mericas) Limited - No. II-cv-7649 (2) Blockbend LId v. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited - No. IJ-cv-7650 (3) Eduardo Child Escobar. et al. . v. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited - No. ll-cv-23120 (4) EastforkAssers Ltd. v. Standard Chart~red Bank International (Americas) Limited - No. ll-cv-7653 3 (5) Gerica investments Inc., et al. \'. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited - No. l1-cv-909 (6) Mailand Investments Inc. 11. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited - No. ll-cv-5732 Kat7- Barron - Negligence Claim Dismissed Pursuant to September 12,2012 Decision and Order (Doc 937): (1) Barbachano Herrero v. Standard Chartered Bank 1nt 'l (Americas) Ltd, et al., No. 11 Civ. 3553 Jones & Adams - Negligence Claims Dismissed Pursuant to November 12, 2011 Decision and Order: (1) Carlos Carrillo v. Standard Chartered Bank International (America...) Limited. et. aI., No 10-cv-20762 (2) Ricardo Almiron \I. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited. et. al., Case No.1 0-20763 Sonn & Erez - - Negligence Claim Dismissed Pursuant to September 12, 2012 Decision and Order (Doc 937): (1) Victor Jorge Saca 6t a1. vs. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited, 11 cv 3480 (VM) (SDNY) 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?