Anwar et al v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited et al

Filing 1146

ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Victor Marrero from Gaytri R. Kachroo dated 5/31/2013 re: Counsel for Lead Plaintiff Ricardo Rodriguez and the putative class have been informed by counsel for Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Ltd. that they intend to request permission today to supplement their 3-page request for a pre-motion conference dated 5/24/2013. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk of Court is directed to enter into the public record of this action the letter above submitted to the Court by plaintiff Ricardo Rodriguez Case. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 6/5/2013) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:09-cv-00118-VM-FM, 1:10-cv-09196-VM(tro) Modified on 6/7/2013 (tro).

05/31/2013

06:47

TO:1212B056382 fROK:617B641125

•

Page: 3

KACHROO LEGAL SERVICES, P.e.

Dr. Gaytri D. Kachroo
225R Concord Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
gkach~~hroolegal.com

May 31, 2013

By Facsimile
Honorable Victor Marrero
United States District Judge
Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse
500 Pearl Street.
New York, NY 10007
Re:

Anwar, et al. v. Fairfield Greenwich, Ltd, et aI., No. 09-CV-118 (SD.N.Y.) -- Caso v.
Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Ltd., et al., No.1 0..cV-9126
(S.D.N.Y,)

Dear Judge Marrero:

We write on behaJf ofthe putative class and lead plaintiff Ricardo Rodriguez Caso.in Caso v.
Standard Chartered Bank Internanonal (Americas) Ltd, et al., No. 10-CV-9196 (S.D.N.Y.). We have
been informed by counsel for Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Ltd. ("Standard
Chartered") that they intend to request permission today to supplement their 3-page request for a pre­
motion conference dated May 24,2013. Caso opposes this request.
Your Honor's Individual Practices make clear that the process for requesting pre-motion
conferences consists of one request and one response, each not to exceed three pages. Caso's response
addresses only the arguments made by Standard Chartered in its original letter, and raises no new issues.
Caso disagrees with Standard Chartered that a supplement to its original letter would aid the Court in
deciding what ·its own Arbitration Order contemplated.

cc:

Sharon L. Nelles (by email)

David Stone (by email)
Mark Schirmer (by email)