Anwar et al v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited et al

Filing 1171

JOINDER to join re: #273 Amended Complaint,,,,,,,,. Document filed by Natixis S.A..(Ginsberg, Bruce)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ANWAR, et al., Plaintiffs, Master File No. 09-cv-118 (VM) v. FAIRFIELD GREENWICH LIMITED, et al., Defendants. JOINDER OF NATIXIS S.A. AS NAMED PLAINTIFF Pursuant to the Stipulation Concerning Named Plaintiffs, So Ordered and entered by the Court on May 8, 2013 in this action, and the Stipulation and Order Adding Additional Named Plaintiffs, So Ordered by the Court on July 24, 2013 and entered on July 26, 2013, Natixis S.A., by and through its undersigned attorneys, hereby joins this action as a named plaintiff. Natixis joins and adopts the Second Consolidated Amended Complaint filed on September 29, 2009 by plaintiffs in this action (“SCAC”) with the exception of the allegations in the paragraphs set forth below, all of which are expressly excluded from this joinder: ¶ 169, fourth and fifth sentences; ¶ 183, third sentence; ¶ 210; ¶ 212; ¶ 215; ¶¶ 217-224; ¶ 308; ¶ 315, fifth bullet point, second sentence; ¶ 316; ¶ 318; ¶ 338; ¶ 339, fifth sentence; ¶ 353(j)(vii); ¶ 353(p)(v); ¶¶ 354-425; ¶ 430, second sentence; ¶ 457(b); ¶ 466, first sentence; ¶ 467, second sentence; ¶ 524, second sentence; ¶ 536, second sentence; ¶ 537, second sentence; ¶¶ 541-557; and ¶ 562, third and fourth lines of paragraph. All paragraphs of the SCAC stating that “foregoing paragraphs are realleged herein” are subject to the express exclusions of prior paragraphs set forth in this joinder. Dated: New York, New York July 26, 2013 Respectfully submitted, DAVIS & GILBERT LLP /s/ Bruce M. Ginsberg____ Joseph Cioffi ( Bruce M. Ginsberg ( 1740 Broadway New York, New York 10019 Telephone: (212) 468-4800 Facsimile: (212) 468-4888 Attorneys for Natixis S.A. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?