Anwar et al v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited et al
Filing
1219
NINTH ORDER AMENDING THE AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER: NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the CMOs are amended as follows: 1. By November 22, 2013, The Citco Group Ltd., Citco Fund Services (Europe) B.V., Citco (Canada) Inc., Citco Global Custody N.V, Citco Bank Nederland, N.V., Dublin Branch, Citco Fund Services (Bermuda) Ltd., PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and PricewaterhouseCoopers Accountants, N.V. (collectively, the "Non-Settling Defendants") shall serve expert reports concerning damages. 2. By December 6, 2013, Plaintiffs shall serve rebuttal expert reports, concerning all issues except damages. 3. By January 15, 2014, Plaintiffs shall serve any rebuttal expert reports concerning damages. 4. Plaintiffs and the Non-Settling Defendants shall cooperate in scheduling depositions of their respective expert witnesses so as to seek to complete such discovery to the extent possible by February 28, 2014 and all such expert witness depositions shall be completed by March 31, 2014. 5. The dates set forth in this Order shall not apply to any further litigation of claims against defendants other than the Non-Settling Defendants in the event that settlements resolving claims against those defendants do not become fully effective and litigation against those defendants Re-commences. ( Deposition due by 3/31/2014. Discovery due by 2/28/2014.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Frank Maas on 11/12/2013) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:09-cv-00118-VM-FM et al.(djc) Modified on 11/12/2013 (djc). Modified on 11/13/2013 (djc).
==;::::_=. . . '. . .
fUSDC SD . ,--~-----...
rn'_......~-~·
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT i
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK) i DOCU~,P~
'~
IT
ANWAR, et aI.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
FAIRFIELD GREENWICH LIMITED, et aZ.,
Defendants.
This Document Relates To: 09-cv-118 (VM)
Master File No. 09-cv-118 (VM)
ORIGINAL
NINTH [PROPOSED} ORDER AMENDING THE
AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
AND SCHEDULING ORDER
WHEREAS, on November 2,2010, the Court entered an Amended Case Manl'gement
Plan and Scheduling Order;
WHEREAS, on January 30, 2012, the Court entered an Order extending the tirpe within
which the parties shall complete fact discovery to September 4,2012;
I
WHEREAS, on August 29,2012, the Court entered an Order extending the tiie within
which the parties shall complete fact discovery to March 31, 2013;
WHEREAS, on January 30, 2013, the Court entered an Order extending the ti e within
which the parties shall complete fact discovery to June 30, 2013 and set the schedule £ r expert
discovery (collectively the "CMOs");
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the CMOs are ame[ded as
follows:
1.
By November 22,2013, The Citco Group Ltd., Citco Fund Services (E rope)
i
B.V., Citco (Canada) Inc., Citco Global Custody N.V, Citco Bank Nederland, N.V., D¥blin
Branch, Citco Fund Services (Bermuda) Ltd., PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and
"'~'
~
PricewaterhouseCoopers Accountants, N.V. (collectively, the "Non-Settling Defendant ") shall
serve expert reports concerning damages.
2.
By December 6,2013, Plaintiffs shall serve rebuttal expert reports, conc rning all
issues except damages.
3.
By January 15,2014, Plaintiffs shall serve any rebuttal expert reports co cerning
damages.
4.
Plaintiffs and the Non-Settling Defendants shall cooperate in scheduling
depositions of their respective expert witnesses so as to seek to complete such discovery to the
extent possible by February 28,2014 and all such expert witness depositions shall be c1mPIeted
by March 31, 2014.
5.
The dates set forth in this Order shall not apply to any further litigation of claims
against defendants other than the Non-Settling Defendants in the event that settlements •esolving
claims against those defendants do not become fully effective and litigation against tho e
defendants fe-commences.
Except as amended above, the provisions of the CMOs remain in effect.
SO ORDERED this I ""fl.- day of November, 2013.
Hon. Fra Maas
United Sates Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?