Anwar et al v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited et al

Filing 1222

VACATED ORDER FOR CONFERENCE PURSUANT TO RULE 16(a): These cases are scheduled for an initial case management conference in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(a), on December 10, 2013, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 20A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York. AT THE CONFERENCE, the parties must be prepared to discuss the subjects set forth in subdivisions (b) and (c) of Rule 16. (Case Management Conference set for 12/10/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 20A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Magistrate Judge Frank Maas.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Frank Maas on 11/14/2013) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:09-cv-00118-VM-FM et al.(djc) Modified on 12/5/2013 (js).

~,

SDNY

.~

r~~~(J(~lJjt1El·~'I1

,

~: ";".~J' ·0:(~t.~r~~{f~~~"i"r('1l)/T ~...
y
, " ~. ",' ' • •"J"....
..J "t;,. .!S. .,. v ..... \.iL ~........... ••t .
..JJ;...t.;.!,.

,! .....

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

----------------------------------------------------------;(

~."",..-----,

...

~

,.

FILED: ,1L/J21 f3
;

.....

,••• ", •• ,_~_,,,,,,.,,,_.... , , , , " , , : " ; r " ' ...~t"""""';"'i'.,.""'_~'
_

"'7"'.""_...,,_~7',o..>,''''?.;_y'',','.... ''''''''' "'0_"'-'.

PASHA S. ANWAR, et a1.,
Plaintiffs,
-against­

ORDER FOR CONFERENCE
PURSUANT TO RULE 16(a)
09 Civ. 118 (VM) (FM)

FAIRFIELD GREENWICH LTD, et £!l,
Defendants.

----------------------------------------------------------x
This document relates to:
Rosental v. Standard Chartered Bank Intemational (Americas) Ltd., 12 Civ. 9421
Diaz v. Standard Chartered Bank Intemational (Americas) Ltd., 12 Civ. 9146
Lyac Venture Corp. v. Standard Chartered Bank Intemational (Americas) Ltd., 12 Civ. 9422
De Uziel v. Standard Chartered Bank Intemational (Americas) Ltd., 12 Civ. 9423
Skyworth Products Ltd. v. Standard Chartered Bank Intemational (Americas) Ltd., 12 Civ. 9427
TRE-C, S.A. v. Standard Chartered Bank Intemational (Americas) Ltd., 12 Civ. 9425
FRANK MAAS, United States Magistrate Judge.
These cases are scheduled for an initial case management conference in accordance with Fed.
R. Civ. P. 16(a), on December 10,2013, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 20A, 500 Pearl Street, New

York, New York.
AT THE CONFERENCE, the parties must be prepared to discuss the subjects set forth in
subdivisions (b) and (c) of Rule 16.
THREE BUSINESS DAYS PRIOR TO THE CONFERENCE, the parties shall submit a
proposed Scheduling Order to the Court in Word or WordPerfect format. A suggested format for the
order can be located on my page of the Court's website. The proposed order is to be e-mailed to
[e-mail], and shall contain the following:
1.

the date of the conference and the appearances for the parties; including the individual
attomey's name, the law finn's name, the party(ies) represented. business address, and

business phone number;
2.

a concise statement of the

3.

issues as they then appear;

a schedule including:
a.

the names of persons to be deposed and a schedule of planned depositions;

b.

a schedule for the production of documents;

c.

dates by which (i) each expe11's reporf will be supplied to the adversary, and
(ii) each expert's deposition will be completed;

d.

a date prior to the conclusion of discovery when a telephonic status conference
with counsel to the parties and the Court will be held;

e.

a date when discovery is to be completed;

f.

a date following the conclusion of discovery when a settlement conference will
be held;

g.

the date by which pretrial motions, if any, will be filed;

h.

the date by which plaintiff( s) will supply pretrial order materials to
defendant( s);

1.

the date by which the parties will submit a joint pretrial order, which should be
in accordance with procedures of the judge before whom the trial will be
conducted; and

4.

a statement of any limitations to be placed on discovery, including any protective or
confidentiality orders;

5.

a statement of any issues relating to electronically-stored information or the fonns in

'Each expert's report is to set f011h not merely the expert's qualifications and
conclusions, but also the facts on which the expert relies and the process of reasoning by which
the expert's conclusions are reached.
2

which it is to be produced;

6.

a5tatcmcnt of any other discovery issues as to which counsel, after a oood faith etTort,
were unable to reach an agreement;

7.

anticipated fields of expert testimony, if any;

8.

anticipated length of trial and whether, and by whom, a jury has been requested;

9.

an acknowledgment that courtesy copies of all motion papers, marked as such, should
be submitted to Chambers, even if the papers have been filed electronically.

lO.

a statement that the Scheduling Order may be altered or amended only on a showing of
good cause not foreseeable at the time of the conference or when justice so requires;

11.

provision for approval of the Court and signature line for the Court.

SO ORDERED
Dated:

New York, New York
November 14,2013

/

United St

Copies via ECF

3