Anwar et al v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited et al

Filing 1275

ELEVENTH ORDER AMENDING THE AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Summary judgment motions due by 9/5/2014; Responses due by 11/3/2014; Replies due by 12/5/2014, and as further set forth in this order. Apart from the preceding amendment, the provisions of the CMP remain in effect. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 6/9/2014) (tn)

0610312014 16:17 FAX

212 446 2350

BOIES SCHILLER

ANWAR, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.

FAIRFIELD GREENWICH LIMITED, et al.,

Master File No. 09-cv-118 (VM)

Defendants.
This Document Relates To: 09-cv-1l8 (VM)

ELEVENTH
ORDER AMENDING THE

AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

AND SCHEDULING ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Case Management Plan ("CMP") is amended and
supplemented as follows:
1. All summary judgment motions shall be filed by September 5, 2014.

2. All responses to summary judgment motions shall be filed by November 3, 2014.
3. All replies to summary judgment motions shall be filed December 5, 2014.
4. Daubert motions shall be filed subsequent to the filing of summary judgment
motions, at a time to be detennined by the Court in its pre-trial order
5. The Anwar Plaintiffs shall be entitled to move for summary judgment with a brief of
up to 50 pages against the Citeo Defendants.
6. The Anwar Plaintiffs shall be entitled to move for summary judgment with a brief of
up to 25 pages against the PwC Defendants.
7. The Citeo Defendants shall be entitled to move for summary judgment against the
Anwar Plaintiffs with a brief of up to 75 pages, which pages are divisible as desired
among the respective Citco Defendants.
8. The PwC Defendants shall be entitled to move for summary judgment against Anwar
Plaintiffs with a single joint brief of up to 25 pages.
9. Responsive briefs may be no longer than the initial briefs filed by the moving party.
10. Reply briefs may be half as long as the initial brief filed by the moving party.

~004/005

06/0312014 16:17 FAX

212 446 2350

BOIES SCHILLER

@OOS/OOS

11. Daubert motions, when ultimately filed, shall be subject to paragraph II. B. of Judge
Marrero's Individual Practices.

Apart from the preceding amendment, the provisions ofthe eMP remain in effect.

SO ORDERED this

fi

y of June 2014

~~.~~~~
Hon.\1ctcr Marrero
United States Magistrate Judge

2