Anwar et al v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited et al

Filing 1284

DISCOVERY ORDER: I have reviewed the recent series of letters concerning the sur-rebuttal reports tendered by the Standard Chartered Plaintiffs on or about May 19,2014. I do not believe a conference to discuss the issues raised is necessary. One thing is clear: had the Ziff report not been substituted for the Zask report, whatever squabbles may have arisen with respect to the expert opinions of Martin, Picard, and Zask would have been resolved long ago. It is unfortunate that the parties' internecine warfare regarding experts is continuing. I will permit the sur-rebuttal reports to stand. Ziff, in turn, may supplement his report within thirty days. I further will permit continued depositions of all three experts within thirty days after any supplemental Ziff report is served. The Picard deposition shall be limited to ninety minutes. The Martin and Ziff depositions shall be limited to three hours. The subject matter of these depositions will be limited to any new opinions expressed in the reports prepared since Ziff was deposed. Each side shall bear the cost of producing its experts; no attorneys' fees will be shifted. Counsel should be wary of making any further applications concerning these experts. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Frank Maas on 6/20/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:09-cv-00118-VM-FM et al. Copies Sent By Chambers. (lmb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERl"~- DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------•••x ~~~~~:~ ~I FUJro ELECTRON!CAl.LY DOC #: DATE FI-LE-D-;-v-I-i-QL-I!+~ PASHA S. ANWAR, et aL, Plaintiffs, DISCOVERY ORDER -againstFAIRFIELD GREE='JWICH LIMITED, et aL, 09CVOlI8-VM-FM) Defendants. This Document Relates to the Standard Chartered Cases. ----------------------------------------------------------x FRANK MAAS, United States Magistrate Judge. I have reviewed the recent series of letters concerning the sur-rebuttal reports tendered by the Standard Chartered Plaintiffs on or about May 19,2014. I do not believe a conference to discuss the issues raised is necessary. One thing is clear: had the Ziffreport not been substituted for the Zask report, whatever squabbles may have arisen with respect to the expert opinions of Martin, Picard, and Zask would have been resolved long ago. It is unfortunate that the parties' internecine warfare regarding experts is continuing. I will permit the sur-rebuttal reports to stand. Ziff, in tum, may supplement his report within thirty days. I further will permit continued depositions of all three experts within thirty days after any supplemental Ziff report is served. The Picard deposition shall be limited to ninety minutes. The Martin and Ziff depositions shall be limited to three hours. The subject matter of these depositions will be limited to any new opinions expressed in the reports prepared since Ziff was deposed. Each side shall bear the cost of producing its experts; no attorneys' fees will be shifted. Counsel should be wary of making any further applications concerning these experts. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York June 20, 2014 FRANKMAAS UnitecYStates Magistrate Judge Copies to: Hon. Victor Marrero (By Hand) United States District Judge All Counsel via ECF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?