Anwar et al v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited et al
Filing
1350
ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Victor Marrero from Walter Rieman dated 12/2/2014 re: On behalf of the Citco Defendants, we are writing to respond to the portion of plaintiffs' letter dated November 20, 2014, that discusses the district court's decision in Osberg v. Foot Locker, Inc., No. 07-cv-1358 (KBF), 2014 WL 5800501 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 7, 2014), petition for perm to app. under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f) filed, No. 14-3748(L), ECF No. 42 (2d Cir. Nov. 25, 2014). ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk of Court is directed to enter into the public record of this action the letter above submitted to the Court by Citgo defendants. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 12/3/2014) (lmb)
PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP
1285 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10019-6064
UNIT 3601, OFFICE TOWER A, BEIJING FORTUNE PLAZA
NO. 7 DONGSANHUAN ZHONGLU
CHAOYANG DISTRICT
BEIJING 100020
PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA
TELEPHONE (212) 373-3000
LLOYD K. GARRISON (1946-1991)
RANDOLPH E. PAUL (1946-1956)
SIMON H. RIFKIND
LOUIS S. WEISS
JOHN F. WHARTON
MATTHEW W. ABBOTT
ALLAN J. ARFFA
ROBERT A. ATKINS
DAVID J. BALL
JOHN F. BAUGHMAN
LYNN B. BAYARD
DANIEL J. BELLER
CRAIG A. BENSON
MITCHELL L BERG
MARK S. BERGMAN
BRUCE BIRENBOIM
H CHRISTOPHER BOEHNING
ANGELO BONVINO
JAMES L. BROCHIN
RICHARD J. BRONSTEIN
DAVID W. BROWN
SUSANNA M. BUERGEL
PATRICK S. CAMPBELL*
JESSICA S. CAREY
JEANETTE K. CHAN
YVONNE Y F. CHAN
LEWIS R CLAYTON
TELEPHONE (86-fOJ 5828-6300
( 1950-1995)
(1927-1950)
l 1927- t 977\
12TH FLOOR, HONG KONG CLUB BUILDING
3A CHATER ROAD, CENTRAL
HONG KONG
TELEPHONE (852) 2846-0300
JAY COHEN
KELLEY A. CORNISH
CHRISTOPHER J. CUMMINGS
ALDER CASTLE
I 0 NOBLE STREET
LONDON EC2V 7JU, U.K.
WPITER'S DIRECT DIAL NUMBER
TELEPHONE (44 20) 7367 1600
212-373-3260
FUKOKU SEIMEI BUILDING
2-2 UCHISAIWAICHO 2-CHOME
WRITER'S DIRECT FACSIMILE
CHIYODA-KU, TOKYO 100-0011, JAPAN
212-492-0260
TELEPHONE (81-3) 3597-8101
WRITER'S DIRECT E-MAIL ADDRESS
TORONTO-DOMINION CENTRE
77 KING STREE::T WEST, SUITE 3100
wrieman@paulweiss.com
P.O. BOX 226
TORONTO, ONTARIO MSK tJ3
TELEPHONE:: (416) 504-0520
2001 K STREEi, NW
WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1047
TELEPHONE (202) 223-7300
500 DELAWARE AVENUE, SUITE 200
POST OFFICE BOX 32
WILMINGTON, DE 19899-0032
-l,J ~-~;t=~. l r, 1 T~_".":Pfi()_NE"(30Z)OSS-44TOll
December 2, 2014
I DOCT \I.
rl
f\
'.
By Hand
I
''
\ ;
i
1·· 1:C' 1·" 1 >'' 'C''\ 1 I\
' . !'.' . • ' '
1: l hJ( ;;:
' -, : l l [ l
United States District
Daniel Patrick Moynihan
United States Courthouse
500 Pearl Street, Room 1040
New York, New York 10007-1312
j_
MARK F. MENDELSOHN
WILLIAM 8. MICHAEL
TOBY S. MYERSON
CATHERINE NYARADY
JANE B. O'BRIEN
ALEX YOUNG K. OH
BRAD R. OKUN
KELLEY D. PARKER
MARC E. PERLMUTTER
VALERIE E. RAOWANER
CARL L REISNER
WALTER G. RICCIARDI
WALTER RIEMAN
RICHARD A. ROSEN
ANDREW N. ROSENBERG
JACQUELINE P. RUBIN
RAPHAEL M. RUSSO
JEFFREY D. SAFERSTEIN
JEFFREY B. SAMUELS
DALE M SARRO
TERRYE. SCHIMEK
KENNETH M. SCHNEIDER
ROBERT B. SCHUMER
JAMES H. SCHWAB
JOHN M. SCOTT
STEPHEN J. SHIMSHAK
DAVID R. SICULAR
MOSES SILVE::RMAN
STEVEN SIMKIN
JOSEPH J. SIMONS
MARILYN SOBEL
AUDRA J. SOLOWAY
SCOTT M SONTAG
TARUN M. STEWART
ERIC ALAN STONE
AIDAN SYNNOTT
ROBYN F. TARNOFSKY
MONICA K. THURMOND
DANIEL J. TOAL
LIZA M. VELAZQUEZ
MARIA T VULLO
ALEXANDRA M. WALSH*
LAWRENCE G. WEE
THEODORE V. WELLS. JR.
BETH A. WILKINSON
STEVEN J. WILLIAMS
LAWRENCE I. WITDORCHIC
MARK B WLAZLO
JULIA MASON WOOD
JORDAN E. YARETT
KAYE N. YOSHINO
TONG YU
TRACEY A. ZACCONE
T. ROBERT ZOCHOWSKI, JR.
r·r·> I,i
!
tj 'J/--- -]
'7
-.~
~~- __ ·
u ge-·------ ----
.
The Honorable V1ctol&\:1L__
1·'1
< I '
CHARLES E. DAVIDOW
DOUGLAS R DAVIS
THOMAS V DE LA BASTIDE 111
ARIEL J DECKELBAUM
ALICE BELISLE EATON
ANDREW J. EHRLICH
GREGORY A. EZRING
LESLIE GORDON FAGEN
MARC FALCONE
ROSS A. FIELDSTON
ANDREW C. FINCH
BRAD J. FINKELSTEIN
BRIAN P. FINNEGAN
ROBERTO FINZI
PETER E. FISCH
ROBERT C. FLEDER
MARTIN FLUMENBAUM
ANDREW J FOLEY
HARRIS B. FREIDUS
MANUEL S FREY
ANDREW L. GAINES
KENNETH A GALLO
MICHAELE. GERTZMAN
ADAM M. GIVERTZ
SALVATORE GOGLIORMELLA
ROBERT D. GOLDBAUM
NEIL GOLDMAN
ERIC S. GOLDSTEIN
ERIC GOODISON
CHARLES H. GOOGE, JR.
ANDREW G. GORDON
UDIGROFMAN
NICHOLAS GROOMBRIDGE
BRUCE A. GUTENPLAN
GAINES GWATHMEY, 111
ALAN S. HALPERIN
JUSTING. HAMILL
CLAUDIA HAMMERMAN
GERARD E. HARPER
BRIAN S. HERMANN
ROBERT M. HIRSH
MICHELE HIRSHMAN
MICHAELS. HONG
DAVIDS. HUNTINGTON
LORETTA A. IPPOLITO
JAREN JANGHORBANI
MEREDITH J. KANE
ROBERTA A. KAPLAN
BRADS. KARP
PATRICK N. KARSNITZ
JOHN C. KENNEDY
ALAN W. KORNBERG
DANIEL J. KRAMER
DAVID K. LAKHDHIR
STEPHEN P. LAMB*
JOHN E. LANGE
DANIEL J LEFFELL
XIAOYU GREG LIU
JEFFREY D. MARELL
MARCO V. MASOTTI
EDWIN S MAYNARD
DAVID W. MAYO
ELIZABETH R. MCCOLM
' '
i:
-----1
Anwar, et al. v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited, et al.,
No. 09-cv-118 (S.D.N.Y.) (VM) (FM)
Dear Judge Marrero:
On behalf of the Citco Defendants, we are writing to respond to the
portion of plaintiffs' letter dated November 20, 2014, that discusses the district court's
decision in Osberg v. Foot Locker, Inc., No. 07-cv-1358 (KBF), 2014 WL 5800501
(S.D.N.Y. Nov. 7, 2014),petitionfor perm to app. under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(/)filed,
No. 14-3748(L), ECF No. 42 (2d Cir. Nov. 25, 2014). Osberg does not alter the
conclusion that plaintiffs' motion for class certification should be denied.
Osberg certified a class alleging claims for plan reformation under
ERISA. Such claims, the Osberg court held, do not require proof of reliance. See id. at
*1. The Osberg court's discussion ofreliance was consequently dicta. Here, in contrast,
I
PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP
The Honorable Victor Marrero
United States District Judge
2
proof of actual and reasonable reliance is essential to the Anwar plaintiffs' claims. (See
Citco Opp. Br. 2-17, ECF No. 1323.) 1
In any event, Osberg' s dicta concerning reliance have no application to
Anwar. In Osberg, the court found that on the particular facts of that case, no reasonable
juror could have accepted the defendant's position respecting reliance. See 2014
WL 5800501, at *6. In the view of the Osberg court, the defendant there "ha[d]
proffered not a shred of evidence" that reliance would require an individualized inquiry.
Id.
Here, in contrast, the Citco Defendants have identified substantial
evidence demonstrating-among other propositions-that the alleged misrepresentations
were not made uniformly to the putative class members; that substantial individualized
issues of fact exist concerning whether any particular putative class member received the
alleged misrepresentations prior to making a decision to invest; and that actual and
reasonable reliance similarly involve substantial individualized inquiries. (See Citco
Opp. Br. 2-17.)
Plaintiffs suggest that they are exempt from the jurisprudence generally
governing attempts at class certification ofreliance-based claims, because, they say, "[i]t
is inconceivable that any investor would knowingly invest in a Ponzi scheme." (Pls.'
Ltr. 2.) That contention is merely a rephrased version of the so-called fraud-created-themarket theory, which is the theory "that but for the defendant's fraud, no market for the
securities would have existed at all." Pa. Pub. Sch. Emps. 'Ret. Sys. v. Morgan Stanley &
Co., No. 13-2095-cv(L), 2014 WL 5487666, at *6 (2d Cir. Oct. 31, 2014). As our letter
of November 17, 2014, explained, the Second Circuit's decision in Pennsylvania Public
School rejected the fraud-created-the-market theory as a purported interpretation of New
York law, and implicitly but unmistakably criticized that theory as a purported
interpretation of the federal securities laws. See id. at *6-7.
Respectfully submitted,
lDfltt'~~~
Walter Rieman
cc:
All counsel in Anwar (by e-mail)
The Clerk of Court is directed to enter into the public record
of~is ~ct~o~ the le~ter, ab~~e sub":itted t~e Court by
~:cl~ c&,f?=
SO ORDERED.
/),
>'I/
DATE
'
vi
2)
o/
v~
I
I
µ
~
/
/,,./ /·. .
---7
~.//"/ ~-=
~l(?'f'Q'RMARRERO. U.S.D.J.
Capitalized terms have the meanings set forth in Citco's letter to Your Honor dated
November 17, 2014.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?