Anwar et al v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited et al

Filing 1431

ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Victor Marrero from Timothy A. Duffy dated 10/22/2015 re: I write on behalf of my client, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ("PwC Canada"), defendant PricewaterhouseCoopers Accountants N.V. ("PwC Netherlands") (collectively, the "PwC Defendants"), and the Plaintiffs (together with the PwC Defendants, "the Parties") to ask the Court to approve a slight modification to the current schedule for the Parties' pre-trial submissions, and as further specified in this letter. ENDORSEMENT: Request GRANTED. The scheduling Order herein is modified to extend the time for the parties' pretrial submission to 11/13/15 and the exhibit list to 11/20/2015. Other applicable dates remail unchanged. So ordered. (Motions due by 11/2/2015.) (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 10/27/2015) (rjm).

KIRKLAND &.. ELLIS LLP
ANO AJFILJl\TCO rMTNE.RSHlrS

30P NOr1h LaSalle Street
chicogo . Illinois 60654
T imothy A. Duffy, P C
To Call Writer Oif"(lc:tly :
(312 ) 862·2445

(312 ) 862-2000

tini duffy@k1rkland com

www kirl<land .com

Fac;s1rn ile.

(312) 862·2200

October 22, 2015

"Jl sDC . S.D ~ Y -

I'f

VIA FAX

D OCLJ\l L:\ !"

fl -ECTIW'.\"IC ALLY FILED

Judge Victor Marrero
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
500 Pearl Street
New York, New York 10007
Re:

! r ) < '<
-

''

aDME FILLU'.

~Jb/f; .,~

Anwar, et al. v. Fair.field Greenwich Lilnited, et al.
Master File No . 09-CV-OO 118 (VM) (FM)

Dear Judge Marrero :

I write on behalf of my client PrlcewaterhouseCoopers LLP ("PwC Canada"), defendant
PricewaterhouseCoopers Accountants N.V. ("PwC Netherlands") (collectively, the "PwC
Defendants''), and the Plaintiffs (together with the P\-vC Defendants, "the Parties") to ask the
Court to approve a slight modificatidn to the current schedule for the Parties' pre-trial
submissions.
The current schedule, entered by an August 28, 2015 endorsement of my prior letter of
August 26, 2015, Docket No. 1406, provided for the submission of the items listed in the Court' s
standing requirements on pre-trial ti lings on November 2, 2015 .
The Parties have exchanged drafts of these items with each other and engaged in multiple
c0nferences to reach agreement on as m{1ch of this material as possible and identify any areas of
disagreement and present those to the Court for resolution. The Parties are of the view that a
short extension of the deadline for su~ 1'!"1itting this material to the Court will allow them to
resolve additional issues and present fewer issues to the Court for resolution without any
negative impact on the overall schedu.le.

The Parties therefore ask the Court to allow them to make their joint pre-trial submission
of all items required except for the exhibit list on or before November 13, 2015, and to submit
the exhibit list on or before November f O 2015 . The schedule for motions in /imine (motions
,
due November 2, 2015 , responses 14 clays thereafter, an<l replies seven days after responses)
shall remain unchanged, and the case ' :Yill still be ready for a Final Pre-Trial Conference as of
December l , 2015 as currently planned.
Hong Kong

London

Los Angeles

Munich

New York

Pelo Alto

Sen Francisco

Shanghai

Wasr11ngton . DC

KIRKLAND &.. ELLIS LLP

October 22, 2015
Pagt! 2

Respectfully,

~
cc :

Counsel of Record (via e/mail )