Anwar et al v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited et al
Filing
1448
ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Victor Marrero from Richard E. Brodsky dated 11/12/2015 re: Request for an extension of time to submit update. ENDORSEMENT: Request GRANTED. The time for the parties' update referred to above is extended to 11-23-15. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 11/13/2015) (spo)
From: Richard E. Brodsky
To: Hon. Victor Marrero
Fax: (BBB) 391-5B19
Page 2 of 2 11/1212015 2:37 PM
Fax: +1 (212) B05-63B2
THE BRODSKY LAW FIRM, PL
RICHARD
E. BRODSKY, ATTORNEY AT LAW
. t1S;l)C SD~~-··:-.-:=---~ .
DOCl ·\1L:-.;T
November 12, 2015
·
''ECll~O'.\iC\'.IYl'::.t.O
~1~'.;~:;_10,_'j~
By Facsimile Transmission
to (212) 805-6382
Honorable Victor Marrero
United States District Judge
Daniel Patrick Moynihan U.S. Courthouse
500 Pearl Street
New York, New York 10007-1312
Re:
Anwar, et al. v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited, et al.
09-cv-118 (VM) (THK)
Standard Chartered Cases
Dear Judge Marrero:
By Minute Entry dated October 29, 2015, this Court ordered that the "Parties
are to update the Court in two weeks regarding uniform negligence count and
proposed remand order." The update is therefore due today. The Standard Chartered
Plaintiffs and the Standard Chartered Defendants join in this request to extend the
time to update the Court on the above matters to November 23, 2015.
Because the Standard Chartered Plaintiffs have varying interests in the
above matters, I am not writing this letter on beha1£ of the Standard Chartered
Plaintiffs' Steering Committee or in my capacity as Liaison Counsel, but I have been
authorized to provide you this letter by the other Plaintiffs.
Thank you for your careful consideration of this letter.
Sincerely yours,
SC Defendants' Counsel
200 S.
-_.
BISCAYNE BOULEVARD, STE. 1930 •MIAMI, FLORIDA 33131
WWW .THEBRODSK YLA WFIRM.COM
786-220-3328 • RBRODSKY@THEBRODSKYLAWFIRM.COM
r
\
ro·
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?