Anwar et al v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited et al

Filing 1574

ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Victor Marrero from Robert C. Finkel dated 11/9/2016 re: Accordingly, Co-Lead Counsel respectfully request that the proposed distribution orders be entered by the Court. With the Court's permission, upon entry of the accompanying orders, we will file the Rabe Declaration and exhibits on Pacer. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk of Court is directed to enter into the public record of this action the letter above submitted to the Court by Co-Lead Counsel. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Victor Marrero on 11/10/2016) (kl)

Download PDF
LAW OFFICES WOLF POPPER LLP LONG ISLAND OFFICE 11 GRACE AVENUE OFFICE PHONE 1212) 759-4600 SUITE 400 FACSIMILE 1212) 486-2093 GREAT NECK, N.Y. 11021 (516) 726-7723 WWW.WOLFPOPPER.COM FAX: (516) 726-7724 DIRECT DIAL: 212.451.9620 November 9, 2016 USDC SDNY DOCUMENT By Hand Delivery Honorable Victor Marrero United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC#: II I . I /I r· ;7 tJ .1 DATF.. FILED: ----,,r-:..___ ,,. Anwar, et al v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited, et al. Master File No. 09-CV-00118 CVM) CFM) Dear Judge Marrero: We are one of plaintiffs' Co-Lead Counsel in the above Anwar action. We respectfully submit two proposed orders, approving, respectively, distribution of the Citco and PwC Net Settlement Funds to Authorized Claimants. The two proposed orders are supported by the accompanying Declaration of Jason Rabe In Support of Entry of Orders For Distribution of the Citco and PwC Net Settlement Funds. The Citco and PwC Defendants, respectively, consent to entry of the proposed orders. Co-lead Counsel are submitting the proposed orders, rather than proceeding by formal motion, pursuant to Your Honor's prior December 16, 2014 Order (Dkt. No. 1342), with respect to distribution of the Fairfield Greenwich Net Settlement Fund, that "[n]o motion practice should be necessary for this purpose." The Citco Net Settlement Fund derives from the $125 million class action settlement that was approved by Your Honor on November 20, 2015 in a Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal (Dkt. No. 1457). No appeals were taken from that Final Judgment, which is now final. As stated in the Rabe Declaration, the Citco Net Settlement Fund consists of $82,818,476.22, calculated by subtracting from the gross settlement fund (including interest) the amounts approved by Your Honor as fees and expenses pursuant to the Citco Final Judgment (Dkt. No. Doc.# l 89800vl WOLF POPPER LLP Honorable Victor Marrero November 9, 2016 Page 2 1457, ~ 21), escrow fees, and the amounts identified in the Rabe the Claim Administrator's fees and expenses. Declaration(~~ 19, 21-22) as The PwC Net Settlement Fund derives from the $55 million class action settlement that was approved by Your Honor on May 6, 2015, in a Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal (Dkt. No. 1569). No appeals were taken from that Final Judgment, which is now final. As stated in the Rabe Declaration, the PwC Net Settlement Fund consists of $36,457,927.88, calculated by subtracting from the gross settlement fund (including interest) the amounts awarded by Your Honor as fees and expenses pursuant to the PwC Final Judgment (Dkt. No. 1569, ~ 21), escrow fees, and the amounts identified in the Rabe Declaration(~~ 20-22) as the Claim Administrator's fees and expenses. Co-Lead Counsel have worked closely with Rust on the administration of the respective settlements and concur with Rust's conclusions with respect to the acceptance and rejection of claims. Accordingly, Co-Lead Counsel respectfully request that the proposed distribution orders be entered by the Court. With the Court's permission, upon entry of the accompanying orders, we will file the Rabe Declaration and exhibits on Pacer. Respectfully submitted, /Id ( f:;v1 Robert C. Finkel RCF:rd Enclosures cc: David Barrett, Esq. Sara L. Cave, Esq. Timothy A. Duffy, Esq. DATE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?