Anwar et al v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited et al
Filing
187
WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Ian Pilgrim waiver sent on 6/30/2009, answer due 9/28/2009. Document filed by Inter-Amrerican Trust; Elvira 1950 Trust; Bonaire Limited; Carlos Gauch; Pasha S. Anwar; Julia Anwar; David I. Ferber; The Knight Services Holdings Limited; Frank E. Pierce; Frank E. Pierce Ira; Loana Ltd.; Wall Street Securities, S.A.; Banco General, S.A.; Harvest Dawn International Inc.; El Prado Trading; Omawa Investment Corporation; Carmel Ventures Ltd.; Traconcorp; Blythel Associated Corp.; Marrekesh Resources; Centro Inspection Agency; Kalandar International; Landville Capital Management S.A.; 20/20 Investments; Diversified Investments Associates Class A Units; ABR Capital Fixed Option/Income Strategic Fund LP; Nadav Zohar; Ronit Zohar; Miguel Lomeli; Morning Mist Holdings Limited; Fairfield Sentry Ltd.; Securities & Investment Company Bahrain; Harel Insurance Company, Ltd.; AXA Private Management; St. Stephen's School; Pacific West Health Medical Center, Inc. Employee's Retirement Trust. (Boruchow, Sashi)
Anwar et al v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited et al
Doc. 187
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
--------------------------------------------------------------)(
ANW AR, et al.,
MASTER FILE NO.
09-CV -0118 (VM)
Plaintiffs,
-against-
WAIVER OF SERVICE
OF SUMMONS AND
FAIRFIELD GREENWICH LIMITED, et al.,
Defendants.
COMPLAINT
This Document Relates To: All Actions
-------------------------------------------------------------- )(
TO: Sashi Bach Boruchow, Esq.
I have received your request to waive service of a summons on Ian Pilgrim in the abovestyled action along with a copy of the complaint, two copies of
this Waiver form, and a prepaid
means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.
On behalf of Ian Pilgrim, I am authorized to execute this waiver and I agree to save the
expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.
I understand that Mr. Pilgrim wil keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the
Court's jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that Mr. Pilgrim waives any objections to
the absence of a summons or of service.
I also understand that Mr. Pilgrim must fie and serve an answer or a motion under Fed:/Q
R. Civ. P. 12 within sIJtty (60) days from June 30, 2009, the date this request was sent. If Mr~
Pilgrim fails to respond, a default judgment may be entered against him. Superseded by
Court Order dated June 9, 2009 fD.E. 168).
I certify that this request is being sent to you on the date listed below.
Dockets.Justia.com
Dated: June 30, 2009
Ama aM. cGo ern
GIL IDE, HELL R & BROWN, P.A. One Biscayne Tower, 15th Floor
2 South Biscayne Boulevard Miami, FL 3313 1
Telephone: (305) 358-3580
Facsimile: (305) 374-1756
Counsel for Ian Pilgrim
2
DUTY TO AVOID UNNECESSARY E)(PENSE OF SERVING A SUMMONS
Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in
Rule 4 of
the Federal Rules of
saving unnecessary expenses of serving a summons and complaint. A defendant who is located
in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff
located in the United States wil be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant
shows good cause for the failure.
"Good cause" does not include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless or that it has been
brought in an improper venue, or that the court has no jurisdiction over this matter or over the
defendant or the defendant's property.
If the waiver is signed and returned, you can stil make these and all other defenses and
objections, but you cannot object to the absence of a summons or of service.
If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve
an answer era ffeliOfll Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 Of the ¡i1.iH!ff and fie . ee¡iy wit the ell. Bye
signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons
had been served. Superseded by Court Order dated June 9, 2009 ¡D.E. 168)
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?