Anwar et al v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited et al

Filing 426

AMENDED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to (52 in 1:10-cv-00920-VM) MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to (384 in 1:09-cv-00118-VM-THK) MOTION to Dismiss.. MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to (384 in 1:09-cv-00118-VM-THK) MOTION to Dismiss.., (387 in 1:09-cv-00118-VM-THK) MOTION to Dismiss.. Document filed by Maridom Limited, Caribetrans, S.A., Abbot Capital, Inc.. Return Date set for 4/16/2010 at 11:59 PM.Filed In Associated Cases: 1:09-cv-00118-VM-THK et al.(Brodsky, Richard)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Master File No. 09-cv-00118-VM-THK This Document Relates To: Headway Investment Corp. v. American Express Bank Ltd., No. 09-CV-08500; Bhatia
v.
Standard
Chartered
International
(USA)
Ltd.,
et
al.,
No.
09
CV
2410;
Tradewaves
Ltd.
v.
Standard
Chartered
International
(USA)
Ltd.,
et
al.,
No.
09
CV
9423;
Ricardo Lopez v. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Ltd., No. 10-CV-00919; Maridom Ltd. v. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Ltd., No. 10-CV-00920; and Maria Akriby Valladolid v. American Express Bank Ltd., No. 10-CV-00918.

PASHA ANWAR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FAIRFIELD GREENWICH LIMITED, et al., Defendants. __________________________________/ UNOPPOSED MODIFIED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO STANDARD CHARTERED DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS This is the modification of the request of Plaintiffs Maridom Limited, Caribetrans, S.A., and Abbot Capital, Inc., No. 10-cv-00920, for a one-week extension of time for the Plaintiffs in the above-referenced cases to respond to the Motion to Dismiss filed by the

Standard Chartered Defendants.1 The original Motion is incorporated by reference herein except to the extent modified in this Modified Motion. This Modified Motion is made at the request of counsel for the Standard Chartered Defendants, who has requested that the relief requested in the Motion be modified to indicate not only that the time for the filing of briefs in opposition to the Standard Chartered Defendants' Motions to Dismiss be extended to no later than May 3, 2010 but that the time for the filing of a reply brief by the Standard Chartered Defendants be extended not, as originally requested, to 21 days of the filing and service of the opposition briefs, but to a date certain, i.e., 21 days from May 3, 2010, or May 24, 2010. WHEREFORE, the Maridom Plaintiffs request that the Court enter an order (a) permitting the filing of briefs in opposition to the Standard Chartered Defendants' Motions to Dismiss no later than May 3, 2010, and (b) permitting the filing of a reply brief by the Standard Chartered Defendants by no later than May 24, 2010.

/s/ Richard E. Brodsky ___________________________ Richard E. Brodsky The Brodsky Law Firm 66 West Flagler Street 9th Floor Miami, Florida 33130 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] [e-mail] Admitted pro hac vice

1

The terms "Standard Chartered Plaintiffs" and "Standard Chartered Defendants" are used herein as they are defined in the Initial Scheduling Order Regarding Standard Chartered Cases (DE 325).
2