Anwar et al v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited et al

Filing 438

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Supplemental Motion served on Counsel of Record on May 3,2010. Service was made by E-Mail. Document filed by Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited, Standard Chartered Private Bank, Standard Chartererd Bank, Standard Chartered International (USA) Ltd., Standard Chartered PLC. (Nelles, Sharon)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------- x PASHA ANWAR, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) FAIRFIELD GREENWICH LIMITED, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) This Document Relates To: Bhatia v. Standard ) Chartered Int'l (USA) Ltd., No. 09-CV-2410; Tradewaves Ltd. v. Standard Chartered International ) ) (USA) Ltd., No. 09-CV-9423; Headway Investment ) Corp. v. American Express Bank Ltd., No. 09-CV08500; Lopez v. Standard Chartered Bank International ) ) (Americas) Ltd., No. 10-CV-00919; Maridom Ltd. v. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Ltd., ) No. 10-CV-00920; and Valladolid v. American Express ) ) Bank Ltd., No. 10-CV-00918. -------------------------------------------------------------------- x Master File No. 09-CV-118 (VM) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on May 3, 2010, the Standard Chartered Defendants' Supplemental Motion to Dismiss on the Newly-Arisen Ground that Plaintiffs' Common-Law Claims Are Preempted by SLUSA, and supporting Memorandum of Law, were served via ECF and electronic mail to all counsel of record. Dated: May 3, 2010 New York, New York /s/ Sharon L. Nelles Sharon L. Nelles (SN-3144) SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 125 Broad Street New York, New York 10004 Telephone: (212) 558-4000 Facsimile: (212) 558-3588 nelless@sullcrom.com Attorney for Defendants Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Ltd., Standard Chartered International (USA) Ltd., Standard Chartered Bank and Standard Chartered PLC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?