Anwar et al v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited et al

Filing 621

MOTION to Dismiss Operative Complaints in Almiron, Carrillo and Lou-Martinez. Document filed by Stanchart Securities International Inc., Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Limited, Standard Chartered PLC.Filed In Associated Cases: 1:09-cv-00118-VM -THK, 1:10-cv-06186-VM, 1:10-cv-06187-VM, 1:10-cv-08272-VM(Nelles, Sharon)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PASHA S. ANWAR, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FAIRFIELD GREENWICH LIMITED, et al., Defendants. This Document Relates To: Moises LouMartinez v. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Ltd., et al., No. 10CV-8272; Ricardo Almiron v. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Ltd., et al., No. 10-CV-6186; and Carlos Carrillo v. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Ltd., et al., No. 10-CV-6187. Master File No. 09-CV-118 (VM) (THK) NOTICE OF UNIFIED MOTION TO DISMISS PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, upon the accompanying Memorandum of Law of Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Ltd., Standard Chartered PLC, and StanChart Securities International, Inc. (together, "Standard Chartered") in Support of Their Unified Motion To Dismiss the operative complaints in Moises Lou-Martinez v. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Ltd., et al., No. 10-CV-8272 ("Lou-Martinez"), dated October 19, 2010; Ricardo Almiron v. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Ltd., et al., No. 10CV-6186 ("Almiron"), dated February 19, 2010; and Carlos Carrillo v. Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Ltd., et al., No. 10-CV-6187. ("Carrillo"), dated February 19, 2010, Standard Chartered will move this Court, before the Honorable Victor Marrero, at a time and place to be determined by the Court, at the United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York 10007, for an order pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6) and 9(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure dismissing with prejudice plaintiffs' complaints in their entirety, and for such further and other relief that the Court may deem just and proper. This motion is filed in accordance with the Second Amended Scheduling Order Regarding Standard Chartered Cases, entered on February 4, 2011. (Doc. No. 602.) Although some of the claims asserted in the Lou-Martinez, Almiron and Carrillo complaints are factually similar to those raised in other Standard Chartered Cases, they each raise new or unique issues of law that were not addressed in this Court's previous Decisions and Orders of September 14, 2010, October 4, 2010, November 16, 2010 and November 23, 2010. Specifically, Lou-Martinez, Almiron and Carrillo raise new or unique issues relating to (i) the pleading requirements of Rule 9(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; (ii) common law conversion and fiduciary duty claims arising from alleged unauthorized transactions; (iii) claims under Section 517.301 of Florida's blue sky law; (iv) contradictory and/or inadequate pleading of fraud, gross negligence, negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of duty of care, -2- and unjust enrichment claims; and (v) claims improperly asserted against StanChart Securities International, Inc. and Standard Chartered PLC. Dated: New York, New York March 21, 2011 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Sharon L. Nelles Sharon L. Nelles Bradley P. Smith Patrick B. Berarducci SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 125 Broad Street New York, New York 10004 Telephone: (212) 558-4000 Facsimile: (212) 558-3588 nelless@sullcrom.com smithbr@sullcrom.com berarduccip@sullcrom.com Diane L. McGimsey (Pro Hac Vice Admission Pending) SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 1888 Century Park East Los Angeles, California 90067 mcgimseyd@sullcrom.com Attorneys for Defendants Standard Chartered Bank International (Americas) Ltd., Standard Chartered PLC and StanChart Securities International, Inc. -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?