Anwar et al v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited et al
Filing
685
ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge Theodore H Katz from Richard Brodsky dated 7/18/11 re: Request that the Steering Committee respond by letter to the request to change the Second Amended Scheduling Order by 7/22/11 at 5:00 pm. ENDORSEMENT: Granted. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Theodore H. Katz on 7/18/11) (cd)
m:MyFax - Richard E. Brodsky To:Hon. Theodore H. Katz (12128057932)
14:03 07/18111GMT -05 Pg 02-03
Honorable Theodore H. Katz
United States Magistrate Judge
Daniel Patrick Moynihan U.S. Courthouse
500 Pearl Street
New York, New York l0007-1312
Re:
Anwar, et al. v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited, et at.,
09-cv-118(VM)(THK):
Standard Chartered Cases
Dear Judge Katz:
I am writing on behalf of the Standard Chartered Plaintiffs' Steering Committee
concerning the Standard Chartered Defendants' request, contained in Sullivan & Cromwell's
letter to Your Honor dated July 15, 2011, that Your Honor approve a change to the Second
Amended Scheduling Order Regarding the Standard Chartered Cases.
We request that Your Honor permit the Steering Committee to respond by letter to
this request by this Fri
e reason or t is request is that
--etm1~ttt:t~"ef!'t:I't;;rfly meets
Tuesdays, and, at this week's meeting, will discuss whether
to make a response. General ,all letters of this sort require specific approval by the
Committee, which ordinarily akes one or two days.
Thankyou for your co sideration of this request. 1 am authorized to tell you that
Standard Chartered has no obj ction to this request.
\
cc:
Richard E. Brodsky
Counsel for the Maridom Plaintiffs
On behalfofthe Plaintiffs' Steering
Committee
Other Members of the plaintiffs' Steering Committee
Sharon Nelles, Esq., CDUfSel for Standard Chartered Defendants
6r~
7/;~h
SO ORDERED
~L fit
T EODORE H. KATZ
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDG
WWW.TllEBRODSKYL\WHRM.COM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?