Anwar et al v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited et al
Filing
693
ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge Theodore H. Katz from Richard E. Brodsky dated 8/1/2011 re: Counsel request until 12:00 noon EDT, Thursday, 8/4/11 to respond to the latest letter dated 8/1/11. ENDORSEMENT: Granted. So Ordered. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Theodore H. Katz on 8/3/2011) (jfe)
m:MyFax - Richard E. Brodsky To:Hon. Theodore H. Katz (12128057932)
R1Cl"iARD E. BRC)DSKY
12:53 08/01111 GMT-05 Pg 02-03
.i\ TJOl\t\:t:Y .'\"/" L.A W
66 W. FLAGLER STREET, 9TH FLOOR. MIAMI, FLORlDA 33]30. PHONE: 786·220·3328. RIlRODSKy@nIEBRODSKYLI\WFIRi-LCOM
August 1, 2011
By fax to (212) 805-7932
Honorable Theodore H. Katz
United States Magistrate Judge
Daniel Patrick Moynihan U.S. Courthouse
500 Pearl Street
New York, New York 10007-1312
Re:
Anwar, et af. v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited, et al.,
09-cv-118 (VM)(THK); Standard Chartered Cases
Dear fudge Katz:
I write on behalf of the Standard Chartered Plaintiffs' Steering Committee.
This is to correct my earlier email and request until 12:00 noon EDT, Thursday,
August 1J 2011, to respond to the latest letter, dated August 1, 2011, from counsel
or
n ar
e en ants re ating to the conference process required
under Fed.R.Civ.P. 3 (a)(1). I apologize to the Court and fellow counsel for any
confusion caused by eferring to Thursday, August J.
sp~c sUb,mitted,
ully
I
/'tt
-/I'
Jcp~1,~~
! Richard E. Brodsky
Counsel for the Maridom Plaint' fs
On behalf of the Plaintiffs' Steering
Committee
cc:
Other Member of the Plaintiffs' Steering Committee
Bradley P. Smit ,Esq., counsel for Standard Chartered Defendants
'7
/
6r~~r:;{'
"'/' /
~ J(//
SO ORDERED;#'
z;zt.-«-Ki~t~..
ff
THEODORE H.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGF
WWW.THEBRODSKYLAWFlRM.COM
m:MyFax - Richard E. Brodsky To:Hon. Theodore H. Katz (12128057932)
12:53 08J01/11GMT-05 Pg 03-03
Note: there is no p. 2. This page is included to permit expeditious delivery of the
single-page letter.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?