Anwar et al v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited et al

Filing 693

ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge Theodore H. Katz from Richard E. Brodsky dated 8/1/2011 re: Counsel request until 12:00 noon EDT, Thursday, 8/4/11 to respond to the latest letter dated 8/1/11. ENDORSEMENT: Granted. So Ordered. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Theodore H. Katz on 8/3/2011) (jfe)

Download PDF
m:MyFax - Richard E. Brodsky To:Hon. Theodore H. Katz (12128057932) R1Cl"iARD E. BRC)DSKY 12:53 08/01111 GMT-05 Pg 02-03 .i\ TJOl\t\:t:Y .'\"/" L.A W 66 W. FLAGLER STREET, 9TH FLOOR. MIAMI, FLORlDA 33]30. PHONE: 786·220·3328. RIlRODSKy@nIEBRODSKYLI\WFIRi-LCOM August 1, 2011 By fax to (212) 805-7932 Honorable Theodore H. Katz United States Magistrate Judge Daniel Patrick Moynihan U.S. Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007-1312 Re: Anwar, et af. v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited, et al., 09-cv-118 (VM)(THK); Standard Chartered Cases Dear fudge Katz: I write on behalf of the Standard Chartered Plaintiffs' Steering Committee. This is to correct my earlier email and request until 12:00 noon EDT, Thursday, August 1J 2011, to respond to the latest letter, dated August 1, 2011, from counsel or n ar e en ants re ating to the conference process required under Fed.R.Civ.P. 3 (a)(1). I apologize to the Court and fellow counsel for any confusion caused by eferring to Thursday, August J. sp~c sUb,mitted, ully I /'tt -/I' Jcp~1,~~ ! Richard E. Brodsky Counsel for the Maridom Plaint' fs On behalf of the Plaintiffs' Steering Committee cc: Other Member of the Plaintiffs' Steering Committee Bradley P. Smit ,Esq., counsel for Standard Chartered Defendants '7 / 6r~~r:;{' "'/' / ~ J(// SO ORDERED;#' z;zt.-«-Ki~t~.. ff THEODORE H. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGF WWW.THEBRODSKYLAWFlRM.COM m:MyFax - Richard E. Brodsky To:Hon. Theodore H. Katz (12128057932) 12:53 08J01/11GMT-05 Pg 03-03 Note: there is no p. 2. This page is included to permit expeditious delivery of the single-page letter.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?