Anwar et al v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited et al

Filing 695

ORDER AMENDING THE SECOND AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER REGARDING STANDARD CHARTERED CASES: Any motions to dismiss filed by the Standard Chartered Defendants in any Standard Chartered Case that has been filed and served and is pending in, or transferred to, this Court on or after January 1, 2011 through January 1, 2012, shall be filed the later of (i) 45 days after the end of every 6-month period, beginning with the period ending on June 30, 2011, or (ii) if upon the conclusion of a 6-month period (beginning with the period ending on June 30, 2011) the Court has yet to rule on previously-filed motions to dismiss, 45 days from the entry of a final Decision and Order by this Court on the last pending motion to dismiss, as further set forth on this Order. Motions in cases transferred or filed after January 1, 2012, shall adhere to the original scheduled. This modification in the schedule is approved on the understanding that delays in filing motions will not interfere with pretrial discovery. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Theodore H. Katz on 8/9/2011) (ab)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NE~~.~=~~e~RWIts:~=======·=;;;:

.

PASHA S. ANWAR, et aI.,

~ ~~~ D( "D'x"
f '(

•

Plaintiffs,
v.

FAIRFIELD GREENWICH LIMITED, et ai.,

. ,.:.\

I"

'f" .. :\j',

I " 11,\ U

1-\,,,, "~ILB:O

i.. '?~:~~~"'-Pl': J/2Ju

Master File No. 09-CV -118 (VM) (THK)

Defendants.

This Document Relates To: All Standard
Chartered Cases.
1'PROPQ~ ORDER AMENDING THE SECOND AMENDED

SCHEDULING ORDER REGARDING STANDARD CHARTERED CASES
WHEREAS, on January 29, 2010, this Court entered the Initial Scheduling Order
Regarding Standard Chartered Cases I;

WHEREAS, on February 1,2010, this Court entered the Amended Scheduling
Order Regarding Standard Chartered Cases;

WHEREAS, on February 4,2011, this Court entered the Second Amended
Scheduling Ordcr Regarding Standard Chartered Cases (the "Second Amended
Scheduling Order");

WHEREAS, the parties aim to refrain from engaging in duplicative motion or
pleading practice on matters already or soon-to-be considered by this Court;

The tenn "Standard Chartered Cases" is defined in paragraph 1 of the Second Amended
Scheduling Order Regarding Standard Chartered Cases.

I

WHEREAS, the Second Amended Scheduling Order provides that the Standard
Chartered Defendants may move to dismiss any Standard Chartered Case that has been
filed and served and is pending in, or transferred to, this Court on or after January 1,
2011, by filing unified motions to dismiss following every 6-month period, beginning
with the period ending on June 30,2011, which are to be filed on or before 45 days after
the conclusion of such 6-month periods.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that paragraph 16(b) of the
Second Amended Scheduling Order is amended as follows:
1.

Any motions to dismiss filed by the Standard Chartered Defendants in

any Standard Chartered Case that has been filed and served and is pending in, or

1f!:.ovyl V~1 /)

()~ I;;L~

transferred to, this Court on or after January 1,201 xshal1 be filed thJllater of (i) 45 days

after the end of every 6-month period, beginning with the period ending on June 30,

2011, or (ii) if upon the conclusion of a 6-month period (beginning with the period

ending on June 30, 2011) the Court has yet to rule on previously-filed motions to

dismiss, 45 days from the entry of a final Decision and Order by this Court on the las~

.:/!

'--;--'1 \
/

pending motion to dismiss.
\

rf"!:: .tJ('Ir!~f)
,~I
/k
/-

A unified motion to cMmiss filed pursuant to clause (i) of the preceding v~~

2.

\

/1'.1;.;"),, C-e,J ~~

,
Vo-rV-r;'V ;J. ;}d/,;}./ JJ-f/ ~kJ

paragraph may address any cases filed and served and pending in, or transferred to, this
Court through the conclusion ofthe preceding 6-month period. A unified motion to
dismiss filed pursuant to clause (ii) of the preceding paragraph may address any cases
filed and served and pending in, or transferred to, this Court for the preceding 6-month
period and through the entry of the Court's final Decision and Order on the last pending
motion to dismiss.

..

'......I-r

1.../.

.=t-;... .

''In-~~.~'£ ~

/ .~b/ ~L~ /~. -;;/'1
---;.

71<

.

/"("c4'.r /,..,-:.
./

~.

{/

{~;;1'
-+
L?(I <S"~.~7 0

11...~ //'--1(/

-­
2

/'"

(J

~ JC.~..J:~p
.

I ~

~ ~

/

d

~{

/.

~'f1-' J
. U

/.j'.

.

t?Y"­

d
//'-»1'~ /

~

3.

Except as amended above, the provisions of the January 29,2010 Initial

Scheduling Order, the February 1,2010 Amended Scheduling Order and the February 4,
2011 Second Amended Scheduling Order shall remain in effect.

SO ORDERED this

l~ay of

¥

"-"ir.t4?

/J~ t/~/A/

,2011.

. :./

I~

HON. THEODORE KATZ
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

-3­