Anwar et al v. Fairfield Greenwich Limited et al

Filing 934

ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge Frank Maas from Richard E. Brodsky dated 8/29/2012 re: We see no prejudice to either party or to the expeditious progress of this case to modifying our request in accordance with the Defendants' response, and therefore request the following extensions. ENDORSEMENT: Approved., ( Motions due by 8/30/2012., Responses due by 9/10/2012, Replies due by 9/17/2012.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Frank Maas on 8/29/2012) (ama)

From: Richard E. Brodsky

Fax: [phone]

TIlE

To: Hon, Frank lVlaas

Fax: +1 1'212) 805-6724

Page 2 of 3 812912012 1125

R.
RICHARD E. BRODSKY, AITORNEY AT LAW

MEMO ENDORSED
o1'\.( -? A G1::- -'"\,
lWLJ

VIA FAX TRANSlVIISSION
August 29, 2012

The Hon. Frank Maas
United States Magistrate Judge
Daniel Patrick Moynihan United
500 Pearl Street
New York, New York 10007-1812
Re:

Df~ar

USDCSDl\iry
DOCU:MENT
E1 E'""'''T''no~ ;rr' AI~~." FILED

I K ,;'\ l \.r1'\. T;Y
'

StaV:~s

Courthouse

J

.... ;.....

DOC #:

DATE FILED:

?l A"

Anwar v. Fairfield Greenwich
No. 09-cv-118 (S.D.N.Y.)
Standard _Chartered Cases
Judge JVfaas:

I am c01..lUsel for the Maridom Plaintiffs and am writing as Liaison
Counsel for the StandardCllartered Plaintiffs Steering Comrllittee.
This letter is sent pursuant to the COUl't'S August 9, 2012 Order
concerning de-designation of documents that Standard, Chartered has
designated as "ConfidentiaL" (DE 913) By the termspfthe Ol'derand a
subsequent modifieation (DE 915), the following schedule was established:
Plaintiffs'letter:
Defendants'response:
Plaintiffs' reply:

August 29,2012
September 7,2012
September 14, 2012

Because of the threat to Southeast FIOl'ida posed by then Tropical
Storm Isaac, the Greater Miami area was essentially shut down ouNlonday.
This has made it. impossible for my staff to coordinate the copying of the
relevant documents on a timely basis. Since the documents are bulky,theY
need to be provided to the Cow·t by overnight delivery and cannot be faxed.
We have therefore requested the Defendants' consent to a one-day
extension. They have agreed, subject t,o exLt-~nbivllt) vi: thv "\-\ev",-,,,
'''::1
three days (because the other deadlines would otherwise fall on a Friday),
While this was not our request, we see no prejudice to either party or to the

/1;(

From: Rkhard E. Brodsky

Fax: (888) 391·5819

To: Hun. Frank Maas

Page :) of 3 8/2912012 11 :25

Fax: +1 \2121 805-6724

Hon. Frank Maas
August 29, 2012
Page 2
expoditious progress of this ease to modifying our request in accordance with
the Defendants' response, and therefore request the following extensions:

Plaintiffs' letter:
Defendants' response:
Plaintiffs' reply:

August :30,2012
]
10, 2012.
September 17, 2012

Si:~ptemher

/'

v'ui

U.) V\A

~/1J1 fLY"' I /
/' ~

l

<t;)Pi

yours,

7JZ;;/lii~
m

Richard E. Brodsky

cc:

Counsel for Stanclard Chartered Defendants
Members of Standard Chartered Pla.intiffs' Steering

C()mmitt<~e

I

/1 y /

vVe respectfully request these extensions be approved and thank Your
Honor for careful consideration of this letter.
Sinc('~rely

1