Moccio v. Cornell University et al
Filing 82
OPINION AND ORDER: Accordingly, judgment is entered for defendants on Moccio's claim for breach of contract, both because she had no contractual right to continued employment, and because even if she had such a right, the letter on which she rel ies was subject to a contingency that was clearly met. For the reasons stated herein, defendants' motion for summary judgment is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at docket item 52 and to close this case. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 8/27/2012) (js)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
