Gabayzadeh v. Brafman et al

Filing 71

ORDER: (1) Plaintiff's motion to extend time (Docket no. 70) is granted. Plaintiff shall submit answering papers by January 26, 2010. The Brafman defendants shall reply by February 15, 2010. (2) Plaintiff's motion suggests that he has not been served with the Brafman defendants' motion papers (Motion 8). This appears anomalous, given that plaintiff has requested additional time to respond. Nevertheless, to ensure that plaintiff has all relevant documents, a copy of the motion papers are being forwarded to him along with this order. (3) Plaintiff's "Motion to Refile Plaintiff's Objections in the Magistrate Judge 9/29/09 Order Preventing the Filing of the First Amended Complaint That Was Served on Defendants on 8/11/09" (Docket no. 58) is denied as moot. By Order dated September 22, 2009, Judge Crotty identified the operative pleading and provided for its filing. (4) Plaintiff's motion for a default judgment (Docket no. 59) is denied. (5) Plaintiff's motion for declaratory relief (Docket no. 62) is denied. (6) Plaintiff's motion to "correct" the docket (Docket no. 63) is denied. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge James C. Francis on 12/14/2009) Copies Mailed By Chambers.(tve) Modified on 12/14/2009 (tve).