Association For Molecular Pathology et al v. United States Patent and Trademark Office et al

Filing 126

MOTION to File Amicus Brief in Support of Plaintiffs. Document filed by The International Center for Technology Assessment.(Risk, Mark)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ASSOCIATION FOR MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, et al., Defendants. 09-CV-4515 (RWS) ECF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF AMICUS CURIAE PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that proposed Amici Curiae the International Center for Technology Assessment, the Indigenous Peoples Council on Bicolonialism, Greenpeace, and the Council for Responsible Genetics shall move this Court, before the Honorable Robert W. Sweet, United States District Judge, at the United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York at a date and time to be determined by the court, for leave to file a brief amicus curiae. Attached hereto are: (1) Memorandum of Law in Support of this Motion for Leave to File a proposed brief amicus curiae, (2) proposed Order granting leave to file the proposed brief amicus curiae, and (3) the proposed brief amicus curiae. Respectfully submitted, Dated: September 10, 2009 /s/Andrew Kimbrell__________ Andrew Kimbrell George Kimbrell (pending pro hac vice) Zelig Golden The International Center for Technology Assessment 660 Pennsylvania Ave., Suite 302 Washington, D.C. 20003 202-547-9359 (phone) 202-547-9429 (fax) kimbrell@icta.org gkimbrell@icta.org zeliggolden@icta.org /s/ Mark D. Risk Mark Risk, P.C. (mdr 5823) Local Counsel for Amicus Curiae 60 East 42nd Street, 47th Floor New York, New York 10165 (212) 682-4100 Counsel for Amicus Curiae the International Center for Technology Assessment, Indigenous Peoples Council on Bicolonialism, Greenpeace, and the Council for Responsible Genetics

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?