Association For Molecular Pathology et al v. United States Patent and Trademark Office et al
Filing
250
ORDER granting 247 Motion for William G. Gaede, III to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 2/8/2010) (js)
Association For Molecular Pathology et al v. United States Patent and Trademark Office et al
Doc. 250
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
ASSOCIATION FOR MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, et al., Defendants.
CASE NO. 09-CV-4515 (RWS)
ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE ON WRITTEN MOTION
BayBio, Celera, Upon the motion of Michael R. Huttenlocher, attorney for Amici Cur~ae The Coalition for 21st Century Medicine, Genomic Health, Inc., QIAGEN, N.V., Target Discovery, Inc. and XDx, Inc., and said sponsor attorney's affidavit in support;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that
Applicant's Name: Firm Name: Address: CityIStatelZip: Phone Number: Fax Number: Email Address:
William G. Gaede, 111 McDermott Will & Emery LLP 275 MiddlefieId Road, Suite 100 Menlo Park, CA 94025 650.815.7400 650.815.7401 wgaede@mwe.com
is admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice as counsel for Amici Curiae BayBio, Celera, The Coalition for 21st Century Medicine, Genomic Health, Inc., QIAGEN, N.V., Target Discovery, Inc. and
XDx, Inc. in the above captioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this Court, including the Rules governing discipline of attorneys. This action is assigned to the Electronic Case Filing (ECF) system, and counsel shall immediately apply for an ECF password at nysd.uscourts.gov. Counsel shall forward the Pro Hac vice -clerk Dated: F e b r u a a 0 1 0 New York, New York of the Court.
NYK 12788461.W9900C023
~CTRoMc~I HY
Unit States District Court Judge
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?