Securities and Exchange Commission v. Galleon Management, LP et al

Filing 208

MOTION for Catherine E. Creely to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Document filed by Raj Rajaratnam.(pgu)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - X SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Plaintiff, - v.- \ 5 '3 09-CV-8811 (JSR) GALLEON MANAGEMENT, LP, ET AL. MOTION TO ADMIT COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE Defendants. -X PURSUANT TO RULE 1.3(c) of the Local Rules of the United States District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, I, Samidh Guha, a member in good standing of the bar of this Court, hereby move for an Order allowing the admission pro hac vice of: - Applicant's Name: Firm Name: Address: City/State/Zip: Phone Number: Fax Number: Catherine E. Creely Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036 (202) 887-4000 (202) 887-4288 .j) (/) "''''l ,.., ··!. ... ' C.::2l ?= ::::? ;-( '') t·~'J ..........!j"""'"'l '. .,,j ~"* .. .c;::;~ ·-j There are no pending disciplinary proceedings against Ms. Creely in any State or Federal court. Dated: June 9, 2011 New York, New York Respectfully Submitted, /LA-:ct. ~ Samidh Guha (SG-5759) Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP One Bryant Park New York, NY 10036 (212) 872-1000 sguha@akingump.com 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -X SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Plaintiff, - v.- 09-CV-8811 (JSR) AFFIDAVIT OF SAMIDH GUHA IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO ADMIT COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE GALLEON MANAGEMENT, LP, ET AL. Defendants. -X State of New York ) ) County of New York ) ss: SAMIDH GUHA, being duly sworn, herby deposes and says as follows: 1. I am a partner at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP, counsel for Defendant Raj Rajaratnam in the above captioned matter. I am familiar with the proceedings in this case. I make this statement based on my personal knowledge of the facts set forth herein and in support of Defendant Raj Rajaratnam's motion to admit Catherine E. Creely as counsel pro hac vice to represent Mr. Rajaratnam in this matter. 2. I am a member in good standing of the bar of the State of New York, and was admitted to practice law in January 1999, State Bar No. 2962199. I am also admitted to the bar of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and am in good standing with this Court. 3. I have known Ms. Creely since 2009. 4. Ms. Creely is an Associate at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP, in Washington, District of Columbia. 5. I have found Ms. Creely to be a skilled attorney and a person of integrity. She is experienced in Federal practice and is familiar with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 6. Accordingly, I am pleased to move the admission of Ms. Creely, pro hac vice. 7. I respectfully submit a proposed order granting the admission of Catherine E. Creely, pro hac vice, which is attached hereto. WHEREFORE it is respectfully requested that the motion to admit Catherine E. Creely, pro hac vice, to represent Defendant Raj Rajaratnam in the above captioned matter, be granted. Dated: June 9, 2011 New York, New York ~A .11 ~. • h /# d"Notarized: tr~_A,'/H~ ~ b. 11. 2ol( 1~ Respectfully Submitted, . MELISSA ANN! AUDKO ~PUblic. State of New lbrtc . No. OfRU6218108 Qua.Jifi~ In New York County Comm•sslon Slcpires May 24, 2014 ~:i.A /Lvh Samidh Guha (SG-5759) Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP One Bryant Park New York, NY 10036 (212) 872-1000 sguha@akingump.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -X SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Plaintiff, 09-CV-8811 (JSR) - v.GALLEON MANAGEMENT, LP, ET AL. .PROPOSED ORDER Defendants. -X UPON THE MOTION of Samidh Guha, attorney for Raj Rajaratnam, and said sponsor attorney's affidavit in support; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applicant's Name: Firm Name: Address: City/State/Zip: Phone Number: Fax Number: E-mail Address: Catherine E. Creely Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036 (202) 887-4000 (202) 887-4288 ccreely@akingump.com is admitted to practice pro hac vice as counsel for Defendant Raj Rajaratnam in the above captioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this Court, including the Rules governing discipline of attorneys. If this action is assigned to the Electronic Case Filing (ECF) system, counsel shall immediately apply for an ECF password at nysd.uscourts.gov. Counsel shall forward the pro hac vice fee to the Clerk of Court. 1 Dated: _ _ _ _ _ _ __ New York, New York The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff United States District Judge CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Samidh Guha, hereby certify that on June 9, 2011, I served a true and correct copy of the foregoing Pro Hac Vice Motion and accompanying materials for Attorney John M. Dowd upon all counsel of record registered to receive notice. Service was accomplished by First Class Mail to the following recipients: fSamidh Guha, Esq. Party Counsel Securities and Exchange Commission Valerie A. Szczepanik Securities and Exchange Commission New York Regional Office 3 world Financial Center, Suite 400 New York, New York 10281-1022 Galleon Management, LP Adam S. Hakki Shearman & Sterling LLP 599 Lexington Ave. New York, NY 10022 Rajiv Goel Norman A. Bloch Thomson Hine LLP 335 Madison Avenue, 12th floor New York, NY 10017-4611 Anil Kumar Robert G. Morvillo Morvillo, Abramowitz, Grand, Iason, Anello & Bohrer, P.C. 565 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10017 Danielle Chiesi Alan R. Kaufman Kelley Drye & Warren LLP 101 Park Avenue New York, NY 10178 Mark Kurland Ted Altman DLAPiper LLP 1251 Avenue of the Americas, 27th Floor New York, NY 10020 1 Robert Moffat Kenneth I. Schacter Bingham McCutchen LLP 399 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022 New Castle Funds LLC Steven R. Glaser Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP Four Times Square New York, NY 10036 Roomy Khan David Wikstrom Law Offices of David Wikstrom Woolworth Building 233 Broadway, Suite 2208 New York, NY 10279 AliT. Far Francisco J, Navarro Kobre & Kim LLP 800 3rdAve. New York, NY 10022 Choo-Beng Lee Jeffrey L. Bornstein K&L Gates LLP Four Embarcadero Center, 12th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Ali Hariri Harlan J, Protass, Esq. Law Offices of Harlan J. Pro tass, PLLC 305 Madison Avenue, Suite 1301 New York, NY 10165 Zvi Goffer William R. Barzee Barzee Flores, P.A. Courthouse Center, Penthouse 1 40 N.W. Third Street Miami, FL 33128 David Plate Roland G. Riopelle, Esq. Sercarz & Riopelle, LLP 152 W. 57th Street, Suite 24C New York, NY 10019 Gautham Shankar Frederick L. Sosinsky 45 Broadway, 30th Floor New York, NY 10006-3007 2 Schottenfeld Group LLC Kenneth Breen Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP 75 East 55th Street New York, NY 10022 Steven Fortuna Francis J. DiMento, Esq. DiMento & Sullivan Fanueil Hall Market Place, 3rd Floor Boston, MA 02109 3 - STA! +'~---!'~ * ~ VIRGINIA STATE BAR CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT CATHERINE ELIZABETH CREELY IS AN ACTIVE MEMBER OF THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR IN GOOD STANDING. MRS. CREELY WAS LICENSED TO PRACTICE LAW IN VIRGINIA ON OCTOBER 17, 2007, AFTER SUCCESSFULLY PASSING THE BAR EXAMINATION GIVEN BY THE VIRGINIA BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS. Issued June 1, 2011 ~~Gtt~ ' ~ •' KAREN A. GOULD EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND . CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER ~ istrid nf <llnlumhm <llnurt nf J\ppeals Qlommitter on J\nmissinns 430 ~ 'frrd, ~·~· - ~om 123 ~as4ingtnn, ~· QT. zaaa1 zoz I 879-Zno I, JULIO A. CASTILLO, Clerk of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, do hereby certify that CATHERINE CREELY was on the duly ~1~1~T-H-- qualified and entitled to day of ______ A_U_G_U S_T~,~-2_0_0_8 __ ____________________ admitted as practice before an this attorney and Court and is, counselor and on the date indicated below, an active member in good standing of this Bar. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the seal of this Court at·· the City of Washington, ·D.C., on May 16, 2011. JULIO A. CASTILLO Clerk of the Court By: Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?