Schoolcraft v. The City Of New York et al

Filing 151

ORDER re 135 Motion to Quash. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff shall in writing to City Defendants indicate that he has no evidence regarding Frank Polanco; Plaintiff shall in, writing indicate that he has no evidence regarding Adhyl Polanco, beyond what which was presented at trial in the Floyd v. City of New York, 08 CV 1034 (SAS) trial that began on March 18, 2013; 3. Plaintiff shall review his October 11, 2012 deposition transcript. Where plaintiff responded to questions by stating that he could not answer without listening to his recordings, or referred to recordings but did not provide a specific recording or date, plaintiff shall identify to which recording(s) he was referring and/or which recording(s) were responsive to the question asked by no later than June 19, 2013. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 6/6/2013) (cd)

-~-------~~-~-~..

06/05/2013 WED 15!28
.,,~

... ~-----------------.-----------.------.

FAX [phone]

~.

-r-----------~~··=·======~======~
USDCSDNY
I DOCUTv! ENT
\
It I~l£CTRONICALLY FILED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

; IX'C

;;.

II

~-~~~~~~~-~~~-~::-~~:-~:~-~.~_~~_--.m.u_m~t:::0~C '~::,-5iJ; t~:~J

ADRlAN SCHOOLCRAPT,
Plaintiff,
ORDER

-agl1inst­

TH..J::: CITY OF XEW YORK, DEPUTY ClllEF MICHAEL 1YlAIUNO, Tax
Id. ~73220, Individually and in his Of11cial Capacity, ASSISTANT CHIEF
PATROL BOROUGH BROOKLYN NORTH GERALD NELSON, Tux. fd.
912370, Individually and in his Offidal Capacity, DEPUTY INSPECTOR
STEVEN MAURIELLO, Tax. Id. 895117, Individually and in his Official
Capacity, CAPTAIN TllEORDORE LAUTERBORN. Tax ld. 897840,
Individually and in hi~ Official Capacity, LIEUTENANT JOSEPH GOUGH,
Tax Id. 919124, Individually and in his Official Capacity, SGT. F.l{ED~RICK
SAWYER. Shiold No. 2576, Individually and in his Official C<lpat.:ily,
SERGEANT KURT DUNCAN, Shiold No 248J, Individllally find in his
Official Capar.:ily, LIEUTENANT CHRISTOPHER I3ROSCIIART, Tux Id.
915354, individuully lind in his Official Capacity, LT. TIMOTllY
CAUGI lEY, Tax ld. No. 885374, lndividually and in his Ofticial Capacity,
SERGEANT SIIANTEL JAMES, Shield No. 3004, Individually and in her
Official Capacity, SERGEANT RICHARD WALL, Shield No. 3099,
Individually and in his Oftlcial Capacity, SERGEANT ROBERT W.
O'f-iARE, Tax Id. 916960, Individually and in his Official Capacity,
SERGEANT SONDRA WILSON, Shi~ld No. 5 172, Individua.lly and in her
Ofticial Capacity, LlEUTENANT Ttf01V1AS HANLEY, Tax. Td. 879761,
Individl.lully and In his Official Capacity, C,W'I'AIN TIMOTHY TRAINOR
Tax 'd. 899922, Individually and iri his Offi~itt1 Capacity, imd P.O. 's "JOHN
DOE" -In·50, Individually and in their Official Capacity (the name John Doe
being fictitious, as tho true names are presently unknown) (col1ectively
referred to us "Cily Defendunls"), FDNY LIEUTENANT nLISE [IAN LON,
Individually and in her official (.;apacity as a lioutenant with tho New York
City Fire Department, JAMAICA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER, OR.
TSAK TSAKOV, Individually and in his Officitd Capacity, DR. LlLIAN
ALDANA-BnRNTnR, Individually and in his Official Capacity, and
JAMAICA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER EMPLOYEE'S "JOliN DOE"
# 1-50, individually <lnd in thoir Ofncial Capacity (the. name John Doe being
fictitious, as the true 11<1I11eS are prcscnUyonknown),

IO-CY-6005
(RWS)

Vt:fendunt.s.
-.---------.-.---------.--.--.-.-.-------~---------------~-------------x

Sweet, D.l.,

City Defendants, having moved this Comt for an Order to compel plaintiff
to provide cerluin discovery to City Defendants,

06/05/2013 WED 15!28
-

FAX [phone]

p.

-

NOW,

011

~005/005

-­

motion

0

r Suzanna

Publicker, Esq., Assistant Corpomllon

Counsel of the City ofNtlw York and attorney for the City Defendants,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1.

Plaintiff shall in wntmg to City Defendants indicate (hat he has no
evidence regarding Frank Pallcstro;

2.

Plaintiff shaH In, writing indicate that he has no evidence Tcgarding Adhyl
Poianco, beyond what which was presented ttl trial in the Floyd v. City (if'
N(-:w YOl'k, 08 CV 1034 (SAS) triul that began on March 18, 2013;

3.

Plaintiff slmll review his October 11, 2012 deposition transcript. Where
plUll1lilf responded to questions by stating that he could not Ul1!')wer
without listening to hi~ recqrdings, or referred to recordings but did not
provide U spcl.:ific recording or date, phlinti1T ~hal1 identify to which
recording(s) he was referring tlnd/(lf which rccording(s) were respo11:'>lV!;!
to the question asked by no I~\tel' than June 19,2013.

Date:

SO ORDER..UD:

~~~---.~I
I

Hlble Robert W. Sweet

2