Schoolcraft v. The City Of New York et al
Filing
221
ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Robert W. Sweet from Nathaniel B. Smith dated 2/10/2014 re: Accordingly, I request that this schedule be so-ordered and that the City Defendants' request for a default, dated February 10, 2014, be denied. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 2/11/2014) (ama)
Feb
10 2014
11: 11 PH
HP LASERJET FAX
February 10, 2014
Honorable Robert W. Sweet
United States District Judge
Southern District of New York
SOO Pearl Street
New York, New York 1007
~---------"~-'-""---"'-----"--"'-"
Schoolcraft v. The City ofNew York, et al.}
lO-cv-600J (RWS)
Dear Judge Sweet:
is
Based on my discussion today with Your Honor's Chambers, it my
understanding that the City Defendant's recent letter-motion is on the Court' B
calendar for February 18, 2014 (for submission) and that the plaintiff's opposition
to that letter-motion can be served and file one week before that date, (i.e. February
11,2014). AccordinglYt I request that this schedule be so-ordered and that the City
Defendants' request for a default, dated. February 10,20141 be denied.
Respectfully submitted,
~~
By Fax (212) SOS-7925
cc:
An Counsel
(by email)
~~~d<
~~T
r/~S6r
~ -fl-'"
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?