Schoolcraft v. The City Of New York et al
Filing
30
ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Robert W. Sweet from Jon L. Norinsberg dated 10/18/2010 re: Requesting that the Court grant additional time to respond to defendant's motion to dismiss, and adopt the following briefing schedule: Plaintiff's opposition due November 19, 2010; Defendant's reply due December 10, 2010 and Oral argument to be held December 15, 2010. ENDORSEMENT: So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 10/18/2010) (jpo)
OCT-18-2010
12124066890
LAW OFFICES
JON
P.0V01
TE.L
13:34
(212) 791~5396
(212) 791-5391
L. NORINSBERG
ATTORNEY AT LAW
TRANSpORTATION BIHLDING
225 BROADWAY
SUITE 2700
NEW YORK, New YORK 10007
BRONX OFFICE
5626 POST ROAD
FAX (212) 406-6890
E-MAIL: NORINSBERG@AOL.COM
BRONX, NEW YORI( 10471
1tL (718) 4J4-30 18
FAX
(718) 432-0Q70
October 18, 2010
VIA FACSLl\1rLE: 212-805-7925
Honorable Robert W. Sweet
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
500 Pearl Street, Room 1920
New York, New York 10007
Re:
SchOO/CTlI(t v. City of New York, et al
10 CV 6005 (RWS)
Your Honor:
I represent plaintiff Adrian Schoolcraft in the above-referenced civil rights action brought
pursuant to 42 U.S.c. ยง 1983. I write to respectfully request an extension ofthe deadline to respond
to defendant's motion to dismiss, which is current1y set for October 26, 2010, until November 19,
2010. This is plaintiff's first request for an adjoumment Counsel for defendant, Gregory 1.
Radomisli, consents to this request.
Based on the foregoing. plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court grant additional time to
respond to defendant's motion to dismiss, and adopt the following briefing schedule:
Plaintiff's Opposition:
Defendant's Reply:
Oral Argument:
November 19,2010
December 10, 2010
December 15,2010
1 thank Your Honor for your consideration of this request.
Very truly yours,
IS
Jon L Norinsberg
JLNlks
Enclosure
cc:
Gregory J. Radomisli
(2] 2) 949-7054
TOTAL P.01
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?