Schoolcraft v. The City Of New York et al

Filing 30

ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Robert W. Sweet from Jon L. Norinsberg dated 10/18/2010 re: Requesting that the Court grant additional time to respond to defendant's motion to dismiss, and adopt the following briefing schedule: Plaintiff's opposition due November 19, 2010; Defendant's reply due December 10, 2010 and Oral argument to be held December 15, 2010. ENDORSEMENT: So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 10/18/2010) (jpo)

Download PDF
OCT-18-2010 12124066890 LAW OFFICES JON P.0V01 TE.L 13:34 (212) 791~5396 (212) 791-5391 L. NORINSBERG ATTORNEY AT LAW TRANSpORTATION BIHLDING 225 BROADWAY SUITE 2700 NEW YORK, New YORK 10007 BRONX OFFICE 5626 POST ROAD FAX (212) 406-6890 E-MAIL: NORINSBERG@AOL.COM BRONX, NEW YORI( 10471 1tL (718) 4J4-30 18 FAX (718) 432-0Q70 October 18, 2010 VIA FACSLl\1rLE: 212-805-7925 Honorable Robert W. Sweet United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street, Room 1920 New York, New York 10007 Re: SchOO/CTlI(t v. City of New York, et al 10 CV 6005 (RWS) Your Honor: I represent plaintiff Adrian Schoolcraft in the above-referenced civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.c. ยง 1983. I write to respectfully request an extension ofthe deadline to respond to defendant's motion to dismiss, which is current1y set for October 26, 2010, until November 19, 2010. This is plaintiff's first request for an adjoumment Counsel for defendant, Gregory 1. Radomisli, consents to this request. Based on the foregoing. plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court grant additional time to respond to defendant's motion to dismiss, and adopt the following briefing schedule: Plaintiff's Opposition: Defendant's Reply: Oral Argument: November 19,2010 December 10, 2010 December 15,2010 1 thank Your Honor for your consideration of this request. Very truly yours, IS Jon L Norinsberg JLNlks Enclosure cc: Gregory J. Radomisli (2] 2) 949-7054 TOTAL P.01

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?