Schoolcraft v. The City Of New York et al

Filing 372

ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Robert W. Sweet from Nathaniel B. Smith dated 2/2/2015 re: Extension of Time for Reply/Response. ENDORSEMENT: So ordered. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 2/2/2015) (kl) Modified on 2/3/2015 (kl).

Feb 02 2015 ll:lSAM
HP LASERJET FAX
-···--·- --· ·- ··-·· - ·--. - -----'"·-·-·--· -· ,·-------- ··-·-

F. 1

--

~.~o~~

1%

1
L.AW Ol"l"ICE OP

NATRANIEL
.

B.

SMITH

ATTOBNE'Y' ~T LAW
111 BJiOA.t>W.A'r

©~nw~
FEB

o::: l.015

-.
D

JUDGE SWEET CHAMBERS_

:Nzw Yoax, N:aw Yo1u1 ioooe
NATH .... lflEJ.

fl, SMITS
Ti:t.: !21'll 227·7061?

Jl..l.IE,

{211i!) IJ40·4~UIO

February 2, 2015
Honorable Robert W. Sweet
United States District Judge
Southern District ofNew Yark
500 Pearl Street
New York, New Yark 10007

Schoolcraft v. The City ofNew
10-cv-6005 (RWS)

York~

et al.,

Dear Judge Sweet:
As one of plaintiffs counsel and with the consent of all defense counsel, I
am writing to the Court to request that the current summary judgment scheduled be
modified to provide an additional week for opposition papers and two weeks for
reply papers. The reason for the request is that late last week on Friday, January
30, 2015, the defendants file4 extensive supplemental papers on their motions for
swnmary judgment respond~ng to the recently-filed Third Amended Complain't.
Accordingly; I am requesting that the Court approve a modification that provi~es
that opposition to the motions for summary judgment be filed by February 11.
2015 and that replies to opp6sitions be filed by Febniary 25, 2015. All defense
counsel consent to this request.

By Fax [phone])
AU Counsel
(by email)