Schoolcraft v. The City Of New York et al
Filing
376
RULE 56.1 STATEMENT. Document filed by Christopher Broschart(Tax Id. 915354 in his official capacity), Christopher Broschart(Tax Id. 915354 Individually), Timothy Caughey(Tax Id. 885374 Individually), Timothy Caughey(Tax Id. 885374 in his official capacity), Kurt Duncan(Shield No. 2483, Individually), Kurt Duncan(Shield No. 2483 in his official capacity), William Gough(Tax Id. 919124, Individually), William Gough(Tax Id. 919124, in his Official Capacity), Thomas Hanley(Tax Id. 879761, in his Official Capacity), Thomas Hanley(Tax Id. 879761, Individually), Elise Hanlon(in her official capacity as a lieutenant with the New York City Fire Department), Elise Hanlon(individually), Shantel James(Shield No. 3004 in his official capacity), Shantel James(Shield No. 3004 Individually), Theodore Lauterborn(Tax Id. 897840 in his official capacity), Theodore Lauterborn(Tax Id. 897840, Individually), Michael Marino, Michael Marino, Gerald Nelson(Assistant Chief Patrol Borough Brooklyn North, Tax Id. 912370 in his official capacity), Gerald Nelson(Assistant Chief Patrol Borough Brooklyn North, Tax Id. 912370, Individually), Robert W. O'Hare(Tax Id. 916960, Individually), Robert W. O'Hare(Tax Id. 916960, in his Official Capacity), Frederick Sawyer(Shield No. 2576 in his official capacity), Frederick Sawyer(Shield No. 2576, Individually), The City Of New York, Timothy Trainer(Tax Id. 899922, in his Official Capacity), Timothy Trainer(Tax Id. 899922, Individually), Richard Wall, Sondra Wilson(Shield No. 5172, in her Official Capacity), Sondra Wilson(Shield No. 5172, Individually). (Shaffer, Ryan)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-----------------------------------------------------------X
ADRIAN SCHOOLCRAFT,
Plaintiff,
-againstCITY DEFENDANTS’
RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S
RULE 56
STATEMENT
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al.,
10-CV-6005 (RWS)
Defendants.
----------------------------------------------------------X
Pursuant to the Local Rules of the Court, City Defendants by their attorney
Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, submit this counter
statement pursuant to Rule 56.1 of the Local Civil Rules of the United States District
Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York to Plaintiffs’ Rule 56.1
Statement of Facts.
1. Admit.
2. Admit.
3. Admit.
4. Deny. See Exhibit 4 to the Declaration of Nathaniel B. Smith.
5. Deny. See Id.
6.
Deny that any decline was related to Defendant Mauriello’s arrival at
the 81st Precinct and that a 3.0 rating is the equivalent of a “marginally
satisfactory rating” but admit that in 2007 plaintiff’s performance
evaluation scores declined. See Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of
1
Nathaniel B. Smith.
7. Deny. See Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Nathanial B. Smith.
8. Admit.
9. Deny. (no citation provided by plaintiff)
10. Deny, except admit that plaintiff did not meet activity standards. See
Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Nathaniel B. Smith.
11. Deny, except admit that plaintiff received an evaluation score of 2.5 in
January of 2009. See Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Nathaniel B.
Smith.
12. Deny. See Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Nathaniel B. Smith.
13. Admit.
14. Admit.
15. Admit.
16. Admit.
17. Admit.
18. Admit.
19. Admit.
20. Admit.
21. Admit.
22. Deny, and refer the Court to the letter referenced herein for an accurate
recitation of its content. See Exhibit 8 to the Declaration of Nathaniel B.
Smith.
23. Admit.
2
24. Admit.
25. Deny, except admit that plaintiff requested the presence of a Duty
Captain.
26. Deny, and refer the Court to the recording for an accurate recitation of
its contents. See Exhibit 11 to the Declaration of Nathaniel B. Smith.
27. Deny, and refer the Court to the recording for an accurate recitation of
its contents. See Exhibit 11 to the Declaration of Nathaniel B. Smith.
28. Admit.
29. Admit.
30. Admit.
31. Admit.
32. Admit.
33. Deny. See Exhibit 12 to the Declaration of Nathaniel B. Smith.
34. Admit.
35. Admit.
36. Admit.
37. Admit.
38. Admit.
39. Admit.
40. Admit.
41. Admit.
42. Deny. See Exhibit 16 to the Declaration of Nathaniel B. Smith.
43. Admit.
3
44. Deny.
45. Deny. See Exhibit 10 to the Declaration of Nathaniel B. Smith.
46. Admit.
47. Deny. See Exhibit 10 to the Declaration of Nathaniel B. Smith.
48. Admit.
49. Deny. See Exhibit 17 to the Declaration of Nathaniel B. Smith.
50. Admit.
51. Deny. See Exhibit 18 to the Declaration of Nathaniel B. Smith.
52. Admit.
53. Deny, except admit that plaintiff testified to his state of mind.
54. Deny, except admit that plaintiff testified to his state of mind.
55. Deny, except admit that PAA Boston testified in the manner set forth in
¶55.
56. Deny, except admit that PAA Boston testified in the manner set forth in
¶56.
57. Deny. See Exhibit 13 to the Declaration of Nathaniel B. Smith.
58. Deny. See Exhibit 20 to the Declaration of Nathaniel B. Smith.
59. Deny, except admit that Sergeant Huffman told Plaintiff he could take
“lost time”.
60. Admit.
61. Admit.
62. Admit.
63. Admit.
4
64. Admit.
65. Deny. See Exhibit 20 to the Declaration of Nathaniel B. Smith.
66. Admit.
67. Admit.
68. Deny, except refer the Court to Exhibit 22 to the declaration of
Nathaniel B. Smith for an accurate recitation of its contents.
69. Deny. See City Defendants’ Statement of Undisputed Facts at ¶30
(Dr. Lamstein told Captain Lauterborn that he “absolutely needed” to
find Plaintiff and “make sure that he was ok”).
70. Admit.
71. Admit.
72. Deny, except refer the Court to Plaintiff’s Exhibit 11 annexed to the
Declaration of Nathaniel B. Smith for an accurate recitation of its
contents.
73. Admit.
74. Admit.
75. Admit.
76. Admit.
77. Deny, except admit that Keith Green, Thomas Crawford, Kevin
Scanlon, and other police officers were outside of plaintiff’s home at
some point on October 31, 2009. See Exhibit 16 to the Declaration of
Nathanial B. Smith.
78. Admit.
5
79. Admit. See Exhibits 3 and 7 to the Declaration of Nathanial B. Smith;
(Entry made out of concern for both safety and well-being).
80. Admit.
81. Deny. See City Defendants’ Statement of Undisputed Facts at ¶30,
(Dr. Lamstein told Captain Lauterborn that he “absolutely needed” to
find Plaintiff and “make sure that he was ok”).
82. Admit.
83. Admit.
84. Admit.
85. Admit.
86. Deny. See Exhibit 11 to the Declaration of Nathaniel B. Smith for an
accurate recitation of its content.
87. Admit.
88. Deny. See Exhibit 11 to the Declaration of Nathaniel B. Smith for an
accurate recitation of its contents.
89. Deny. See Exhibit 11 to the Declaration of Nathaniel B. Smith for an
accurate recitation of its contents.
90. Deny, except admit that plaintiff initially agreed to go to Forest Hills
Hospital. See Exhibit 11 to the Declaration of Nathaniel B. Smith for
an accurate recitation of its contents.
91. Deny, except admit that plaintiff eventually refused further medical
attention and went back into his apartment.
92. Deny. See Exhibit 11 to the Declaration of Nathaniel B. Smith for an
6
accurate recitation of its contents.
93. Deny. See Exhibit 11 to the Declaration of Nathaniel B. Smith for an
accurate recitation of its contents.
94. Deny. See Exhibits 10 and 21 to the Declaration of Nathaniel B. Smith.
95. Deny.
96. Deny, except admit that Lieutenant Broschart rode in the ambulance
with plaintiff and refer the Court to Exhibit 11 to the Declaration of
Nathanial B. Smith for an accurate recitation of its contents.
97. Deny. See Exhibit A to the Shaffer Declaration in support of City
Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment
(hereinafter “Shaffer Decl.”) (Marino Dep. at 319:20-25).
98. Admit.
99. Deny. See Exhibit 27 to the Declaration of Nathaniel B. Smith for an
accurate recitation of its contents.
100. Admit.
101. Admit.
102. Deny, except admit that plaintiff had to be “double cuffed” to the
gurney. See Plaintiff’s Exhibit 29 at p.143:2-10.
103. Deny. See Exhibit B to the Shaffer Decl. at p. 160:14-16 wherein Sgt.
Sawyer flatly denies the conduct alleged.
104. Deny. See Plaintiff’s Exhibit 27 for a thorough explanation of the
reasoning behind plaintiff’s stay.
105. Admit.
7
106. Deny.
107. Admit.
108. Admit.
109. Deny. (“Statements and reports [*34] that are unsworn and not
affirmed to be true under the penalty of perjury are inadmissible in
opposition to a motion for summary judgment.”) Jimenez v. Gubinski,
2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11857, at *8 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 30, 2012) (citing,
inter alia, McLoyrd v. Pennypacker, 178 A.D.2d 227, 228, 577
N.Y.S.2d 272, 273 (1st Dep't 1991)).
110. Admit.
111. Admit.
112. Deny, except admit that plaintiff was released from Jamaica Hospital
on November 6, 2009. See Exhibit 27 to the Declaration of Nathanial
B. Smith for an accurate recitation of the status of plaintiff’s insurance
benefits at the time he was released.
113. Deny.
114. Deny. See Exhibit 16 to the Declaration of Nathanial B. Smith for an
accurate recitation of its contents.
115. Admit.
116. Admit.
117. Deny. See Exhibit 35 to the Declaration of Nathanial B. Smith for an
accurate recitation of its contents.
118. Deny knowledge and information sufficient to form a belief as to the
8
truth of this allegation and note that defendant Mauriello is the party
most capable of responding to same.
119. Admit.
120. Admit.
121. Admit.
122. Deny. 1
123. Deny knowledge and information sufficient to form a belief as to the
truth of this allegation and note that defendant Mauriello is the party
most capable of responding to same.
124. Deny. See Counterclaims at Docket Entry No. 231 for an accurate
recitation of their contents.
125. Deny.
126. Admit.
127. Deny. See Exhibit 15 to the Declaration of Nathaniel B. Smith for an
accurate recitation of its contents.
128. Admit.
129. Deny. See Exhibit 16 to the Declaration of Nathaniel B. Smith for an
accurate recitation of its contents.
1
A complete copy of Defendant Mauriello’s deposition today, which spanned the course of 2 days and
which several hundred pages long, can be provided to the Court upon request but is too voluminous to
attach here. There can be no dispute that Mauriello testified extensively on many topics.
9
Dated: February 11, 2015
/s/
___________________
Ryan G. Shaffer
Senior Counsel
New York City Law Department
100 Church Street
New York, New York 10007
10
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?