Schoolcraft v. The City Of New York et al
Filing
400
FILING ERROR - DUPLICATE DOCKET ENTRY - DECLARATION of NATHANIEL B. SMITH in Opposition re: 297 MOTION for Summary Judgment .. Document filed by Adrian Schoolcraft. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit POX 36, # 2 Exhibit POX 37, # 3 Exhibit POX 38, # 4 Exhibit POX 39)(Smith, Nathaniel) Modified on 2/17/2015 (db).
KELLY
l
2
195
statement.
3
Q
Please continue.
4
A
I want to thank you, Judge·Mollen, and the
s
members of the City of New York Commission to
6
Investigation Alleged Police Corruption for this
7
opportunity to
a
addition to testifying, I have the opportunity before you
9
issue your final report to comment in writing and in
t~stify
today.
I would ask that, in
10
detail on a number of statements and assertions that were
11
presented in the course of the hearings.
12
Nothing is more important to the successful
13
policing of the nation's largest city than the integrity
14
and credibility of the members of its Police Department.
15
The corrupt act of even one police officer inflicts
16
incalculable damage on the rest.
11
the professional, and it erodes public confidence in the
18
men and women from whom the people of New York have every
19
right to expect complete honesty and incorruptibility.
20
It undermines pride in
This is especially true as the Police
21
Department embraces community policing and enlists the
22
support of people whQ live and- work in the neighborhoods
23
of this City.
24
police in a partnership to combat crime if they have
25
reason to believe that police officers themselves are
we can hardly aSk the people to join the
MATICH-WI~~ RI?O~TING
,n" "-<>nan,.. v
-~---~-
COVZRAGZ
•TH FLOOR • HEW YORK, N£W YORK.
----
1000"1-llO~
KELLY
1
196
2
3
i'-
engaged in it.
We can hardly expect the overwhelming
'
majority of honest police officers to take pride in their
•
job -- in one of the toughest law enforcement
5
environments anywhere in the world -- if the corrupt
'
police officer easily escapes detection and punishment.
7
The people of New York City must know they can
s
count on the members of their Police Department to be as
9
honest as they are brave and able.
They must know they
10
can count on the Police Department to track down and
11
drive from our ranks those who violate their oath and
l2
break the law.
It is fundamental to the
13
~onest
operation of
l4
government that the police be honest.
15
of New York City's Police Commissioners understood this
16
better than most.
17
said,
lB
portion of our population. they stand as the embodiment as
l9
well as the representative of the law of the land.
20
Roosevelt said,
21
members are not intelligent and honest."
22
observation is as true today as when Roosevelt made it
23
nearly a century ago.
24
25
11
The most renowned
Police officers, Theodore Roosevelt
do not merely preserve order
11
. but to a large
11
No police force is worth anything if its
And that
In a police department soon to exceed 31,000
uniformed members -- some two and a half times bigger
KELLY
.l
197
2
than Chicago's and more than four times larger than Los
3
angeles' -- the corrupt police officer is all but
4
inevitab.le.
s
officer is neither inevitable nor acceptable.
6
why you, Judge Mallen, and your fellow Commissioners
7
perform a high public service in examining the extent of
a
corruption in the Police Department and the extent of the
9
Department's failure to combat it.
10
'
~l
i
However, tolerance £or the corrupt police
That is
Over the last several months, the Police
Department has supplied the investigative staff of the
li2
Commission with thousands of files in preparation for
13
these hearings.
l4
your investigators were at all times thorough and
15
professional, and the Police Departme~t takes pride in
16
the fact that many of them are former members of the
17
Department.
'''
I would like to note for the record that
As familiar as I had become last year with the
1a
19
particulars of the Michael Dowd case, I was revolted
20
nonetheless by the testimony of Dowd and the other
21
corrupt ex-police officers who testified before you.
22
None of them took personal responsibility for their
?3
depravity.
h4
''
because his supervisor encouraged him.
2s
If Dowd abused alcohol on ·the job, it was
When he steals
the·savings of a hard-working woman, it is to win the
KELLY
1
198
2
acceptance of his new partner.
Cawley beats people, not
J
because he's a thug, but because his sergeant rewards
4
him.
s
Police Department made me do it.
The self-serving chorus was always the same:
6
The
Most galling of all was their insistence that
7
they kept quiet about criminal activity they witnessed
a
out of some unshakable bond with their brother officers,
9
rather then the self-serving actions of corrupt hoodlums.
10
Cawley claimed he would never betray another cop, yet he
11
gladly sold guns to people who could use them to shoot
12
police officers.
13
thievery, extortion, and brutality, the witnesses were
14
offensive in another respect:
1s
themselves as typical police officers gone astray.
Beyond their self-confessed acts of
They tried to paint
The truth is something else.
16
Most police
11
officers consider Dowd and Cawley and their ilk to be
1B
despicable.
19
''low lifes 11 who deserve to be in prison.
20
officers I know would have locked them up themselves, and
21
most police officers I know were outraged by their
22
posturing.
They are, in the vernacular of the street,
Most police
They never should have been police officers
.23
in the first place, a subject to which I'll return later
; 24
in my testimony.
'2s
As shocking as they were, these witnesses
'''
--··· .....
----~~-·--
------. --
KELLY
l
199
2
served a purpose in raising legitimate questions as to
3
how theY could function unimpeded for as long as they
4
did.
s
as to how well out ·supervisors are trained and deployed
G
and whether they are tempted to close their eyes to
7
suspected wrongdoing by officers under their command.
They raised questions that bear serious examina_tion
These were among the same questions first
a
g
raised in a series of articles written by columnist Mike
10
Mc~lary
11
undertook a review of how the Michael Dowd case was
12
mishandled.
13
responded when these problems surfaced.
14
them Publicly and began the job of correcting them.
15
process continues today.
16
17
18
in June 1992.
As a result of those stories, I
I think it is important to know that we·
We identified
That
On November 16, 1992, I reported a number of
failures, including:
(1)
The dual system of corruption
19
investigation blurred responsibility and diminished
20
accountability.
21
(2)
IAD'S ability to determine its own
22
workload was an obstacle to the efficient and effective
23
conduct of investigations.
24
25
--------
{3)
The FIAU's were hampered by a lack of
resources and by !AD's dismissive posture toward them.
--··· ·---
"'"n~.,.nrc
cov:z:R.Aor
KELLY
1
(4)
2
3
6
7
B
s
10
There was a failure to use time-honored
investigative techniques to achieve results.
( 5)
IAD lacked a credible case management
(6)
'
s
200
Access to important case information was
system.
too limited.
(7)
The level of staffing for internal
investigations was inadequate.
( 8)
Internal investigative units had
11
difficulty recruiting and retaining qualified
12
investigators.
13
(9)
FIAU investigators conducted most
14
corruption investigations but were inadequately
15
and were provided inadequate equipment.
l&
trained
The central question to emerge from the Dowd
17
case was how could a corrupt police officer identified by
18
the system as a problem operate with such impunity for so
19
long without being .caught by the Department·.
20
not protected as part of some conspiracy or coverup, but
21
Dowd was not stopped sooner because the anti-corruption
22
system in place was bifurcated and large ineffective when
23
it came to major investigations.
24
Dowd was
Before a clear, unified chain of command was
put in place, corruption investigations were the
r
KELLY
'
_! 2
201
responsibility of both IAD and the Field Internal Affairs
Units.
The creation of the Field Internal Affairs Units
in 1972·was well intentioned.
It was intended to fix
responsibility for corruption prevention at the command
level.
That's why the FIAU officers were answerable to
sep~rate
field commanders, while IAD had oversight
responsibilities.
g
The effect was to obscure
responsibility rather than reinforce it.
In my view, the best way to assure
accountability is to make responsibility as clear cut and
unambiguous as possible.
In theory the former IAD would
monitor FIAU investigators and run parallel
investigations to check on the quality and integrity of
their activities, but, in fact, very little of either
occurred.
We found that the Field Internal Affairs Units
suffered not only from a lack of IAD oversight support,
but from a lack of equipment and personnel.
20
case loads much larger than IAD' s.
They had
IAD itself
investigated only 5 percent of all corruption cases.
We
found that the FIAU's received little if any guidance as
to which cases to close and which ones to devote more
time.
We also found that there was an over-reliance
.........,.U"',.'"
QJIPOil,.IIlC
coon::uar.
~
1
KELLY
2
choice among all candidates seeking assignments as
3
supervisors to any investigative arm of the Police
4
Departme'nt.
s
investigative supervisors in the New York City Police
6
Department is now through the Internal Affairs BureaU.
7
IAB gets whomever it deems the best, and we are providing
a
these outstanding supervisors with training that we found
9
lacking in the past.
10
203
In other words, the career path for
We sought out a management consulting firm with
11
a worldwide reputation for excellence, McKinsey &
12
Company, and asked them to undertake a thorough
13
.management review of the Department's corruption-fighting
14
systems.
15
installed-new case management and quality control
16
systems.
17
computerized information system to greatly improve the
18
quality of our investigations.
1~
As a result of the firm's recommendations, we
We are obtaining a new state-of-the-art
We established nine working groups comprised of
20
Police Department executives and experts from outside of
21
the Department to address specific areas of concern.
22
They included Process and Organization, Information
23
Systems, Investigative Techniques, Personnel Selection
24
and Career Path, Training, Equipment, Physical Plant,
25
Legal, and Transition.
----L-.
----
-------
KELLY
204
We initiated weekly steering committee meetings
within IAB for the purpose of continual case review,
providing tOr problem solving and reinforcing
accountability.
We introduced a comprehensive training
program for IAB personnel.
Working with the Department
of Investigations and the Police Department's Detective
and Organized Crime Control bureaus, we developed a
mo~el
package of equipment for investigative and surveillance
teams and spent $2.7 million acquiring it for them.
We
also introduced a new vehicular fleet for IAB, making
unobtrusive leased cars and special surveillance vehicles
avai~able
to investigators.
We are working to reduce backlogs, to close
'
cases without investigative merit, and to build evidence
to prosecute all serious cases.
to move
cases.eff~ciently
While we are determined
and expeditiously, we are also
prepared to devote time and resources to long,
complicated cases that merit such attention.
McKinsey & Company cited the
11
large reactive
rnanagement 11 of corruption cases in the past, so we are
taking an aggressive posture, putting into play
sophisticated sting operations to bring corrupt police
officers and others into our net.
We are using integrity tests, both targeted
NATION·~DI 1ZPOR~I"Q
COVERAGE
30S BROA.DIIA:t, 4TH FLOOR • NEW YORK. NEW YORK,
------------
1000,·110~
-----~
KELLY
205
tests against officers suspected of corruption, as well
as random tests that could reach anyone.
If there was
ever a reluctance to turn corrupt officers against each
other, I do not share it.
We will turn them
even give them a chance to redeem themselves
we may
in order
to bring down the others.
We are debriefing drug dealers and confidential
in~ormants
to determine whether they are aware of any
police corruption.
We will use criminal informants, and
we will seek the district attorney's help in doing so.
We will make the case for wire taps and use them.
We have examined the times of corruption-prone
activities and provided additional IAB coverage from
midnight to 8 a.m.
Also, for the first time, IAB
investigators are d-ispatched as a matter of course to
incidents in which a person is shot by a police officer.
We have established a special litigation unit to pursue
allegations of wrongdoing when they first surface in
notice of claims against the City.
We are examining any
correlation between corruption. complaints and complaints
of excessive force that are made with the Civilian
Complaint Review Board.
After listening to the testimony of witnesses
and Commission staff members, the Police Department is
HATION•WZDZ
~POR~~NC
COVZAACZ
JOS BROADWAY, 4TH I'LOOR • NE'W YORK, NEW YOR!t, l0007•ll09
..
·---·-----·~-
---
.
----
--·
-
-------- -
'·
KELLY
206
making every effort to treat people who make corruption
complaints -- whether members of the
Departrn~nt
or
members-of the public-- with courtesy and encouragement.
Toward that end, we are making the Language: Line
translation service available to the IAB Action Desk.
In
this way, complainants who do not speak or _understand
English may have immediate access by telephone to
translators on the same line with IAB officers.
To encourage members of the Police Department,
as well as the general public, to report corruption, we
have established a new, easy-to-remember, toll-free
number.
It is 1-800-PRIDE PD.
We are also encouraging
complainants -- police and civilian
to write either to
a special IAB postal box -- Box 111 in Brooklyn 11201 -or personally to me at· Police Headquarters.
I want every
member of the Police Department to know that if they have
any reservations about reporting corruption to a
particular supervisor or commander, they always have the
of going directly to the Police Commissioner.
In testifying about the improvements we have
our internal investigative systems, I don't want
that the issue of corruption-fighting
there.
Of course, it does not.
~f'oimaLt;.on
of Internal Affairs and even beyond the
N~TION·WIDI ~fORTING
3Q~
It goes far beyond
llltO,t.JlWI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?