Schoolcraft v. The City Of New York et al

Filing 421

ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Robert W. Sweet from Ryan G. Shaffer dated 3/5/2015 re: Enlargement of page limitations. ENDORSEMENT: So ordered. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 3/12/2015) (ajs)

Download PDF
03/05/2015 THU 18~36 ~002/003 FAX THE CITY OF NEW YORK r,t\CHAH.Y W. CARTER K\'AN G. !illlAFFER S1mlor Coimnl LAW DEPARTMENT Curporatl()fl Cnun,e/ pho11i.:: (212) 356-2386 fax· (212) 788-!177<1 rsh11ffi.:r@luw, nyl:.~uv 100 CllUH..CH STREET NEW YOllK. NY 10007 March 5, 2015 BY l~'AX Honorable Robert W. Sweet United Stutes District Judge Soulhem District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007 Re: r·~~·~~;:~~~~- ;~ ::·~; ·,~,:/~_.:,~; ~-:~~ . ~ :: :;~::..::~::::::::.:::f 1 ~ 1 ) DOGU.tvfEl\T \ 1 ; r~·J. J:~:~=]~lZO:\~!l(~~/\.I.~I . ~/" I ~ Schoolcraft v. The City of New York,_9!..gil; D()C #: 1O-CV-6005 (R WS) ~-'~~~1~~~- - Your JTon or: it ~--~.,. lam Senior Counsel in the office or Ztu.:haty W. Carter, Corporation Counsel of the City of New York, assigned Lo represent City Defendants in the above-referenced mutter, I write to respeclllllly rnqucst that the Cornt grnnt City Defendants u totul or 50 pages for their reply memorandum. Such a request is necessitated by the fact th;;tt plaintiff's opposition to City defendants' paitial summary judgmenl rnoliun is over 80 pages, far beyond the 50 pages permitted by the Court Tthunk tht'I Court CC1r its time and consideration of this request. , L;C: Nathaniel Smith (By EMAlL) Attorney for Plaintiff Or~gc>ry John Radomisli (By EMAlL) MARTIN CLEARWATER & 13ELL LLP Attorneysjbr Jamaica Hospital Medical Center I3rian Lee (Uy EMAlL) IV ONE, DEVTNR & JENSEN, LLP Allurneysfor Dr. Isak Isakov 03/05/2015 THU 18!36 ~003/003 FAX Paul Callm1 (By EMAIL) CATJ,AN,KOSTER, BRADY &BRENNAN, LLP Attorneys.for Lillian Aldana-Bernier Wltlter A. Kretz, Jr. (13y EMAIL) SCOPPETl'A SEJFF KRETZ & ABERCROMBIE Attorney for TJefendunt Mauriello 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?