Schoolcraft v. The City Of New York et al

Filing 500

DECLARATION of Alan H. Scheiner in Support re: 498 MOTION in Limine To Preclude Plaintiff From Offering Certain Evidence at Trial.. Document filed by Christopher Broschart(Tax Id. 915354 in his official capacity), Christopher Broschart(Tax Id. 915354 Individually), Kurt Duncan(Shield No. 2483, Individually), Kurt Duncan(Shield No. 2483 in his official capacity), William Gough(Tax Id. 919124, Individually), William Gough(Tax Id. 919124, in his Official Capacity), Elise Hanlon(in her official capacity as a lieutenant with the New York City Fire Department), Elise Hanlon(individually), Shantel James(Shield No. 3004 in his official capacity), Shantel James(Shield No. 3004 Individually), Theodore Lauterborn(Tax Id. 897840 in his official capacity), Theodore Lauterborn(Tax Id. 897840, Individually), Michael Marino, Michael Marino, Gerald Nelson(Assistant Chief Patrol Borough Brooklyn North, Tax Id. 912370 in his official capacity), Gerald Nelson(Assistant Chief Patrol Borough Brooklyn North, Tax Id. 912370, Individually), Frederick Sawyer(Shield No. 2576 in his official capacity), Frederick Sawyer(Shield No. 2576, Individually), The City Of New York. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G (Under Seal), # 8 Exhibit PTX 4, 6, 13, 16, 18, 22, 25, 26, 29, 30, 33, 34, 35, 40, 42, 46, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 57, 59, 60, 62, 64, 65, 66, 72, 84, 93, 95, 306, 308, 309, 314, 316, 400, 401, 402, 403, 406, 407, 408, 409, 420, 421, 426, 427 (Under Seal), # 9 Exhibit PTX 79, # 10 Exhibit PTX 81 (Part 1 of 2), # 11 Exhibit PTX 81 (Part 2 of 2), # 12 Exhibit PTX 404, # 13 Exhibit PTX 410, # 14 Exhibit PTX 411)(Thadani, Kavin)

Download PDF
PTX 410 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 46 of 235 Salmeron - redirect D3M9FL01 f Thank you. 8 74 PLAINTIFF'S I :d..EXHIB" 1 THE COURT: 2 (Witness excused) 3 THE COURT: Your next witness. 4 MR. MOORE: The plaintiffs would call Deputy Chief I tit~L) 5 II Michael Marino. 6 II 7 II called as a witness by the Plaintiffs, 8 II having been duly sworn, testified as follows: MICHAEL MARINO, THE COURT: 9 10 Thank you. II DIRECT EXAMINATION 11 BY MR. MOORE: 12 Q. Good morning Chief Marino? 13 A. Good morning, sir. 14 Q. ,When did you join the NYPD? 15 A. November 1979. 16 II Q. So you've been a police officer for almost 34 years? 17 II A. I'm in my 34th now, sir, correct. 18 II And what's your current rank? 19 II A. Deputy chief. 20 II When were you promoted to deputy chief? 21 II A. December of 2004. 22 II Is it -- you agree -- withdraw that. 23 II 24 II of buying steroids? 25 Q. Q. Q. In 2007 you and two dozen police officers were accused MS. PUBLICKER: Objection, your Honor. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 47 of 235 Marino - direct D3M9FL01 1 THE COURT: 2 MS. PUBLICKER: 875 Whoa, whoa. Objection. He's getting into a 3 II disciplinary matter which has nothing to do with this matter. 4 II 5 II statement. 6 II discuss it, I would ask that we clear the courtroom because it 7 II It has nothing to do with stop, question, frisk or false It involves a medical issue. And if we're going to involves HIPAA issues. 8 MR. MOORE: It's a matter of public record. 9 THE COURT: That may be. 11 MR. MOORE: I think it's relevant to show he was -- 12 MS. GROSSMAN: 10 13 II II relevant. THE COURT: I think he can explain the relevance II without violating the HIPAA issues. 16 17 Your Honor, could we have a sidebar since there are HIPAA issues. 14 15 But I don't see why it's MR. MOORE: The relevance is to show he was accused of II a serious infraction, disciplined. 18 THE COURT: So what? 19 MR. MOORE: And it didn't have any effect on his 21 THE COURT: No. 22 MR. MOORE: All right. 20 II career. 23 II 24 II A. Yes, sir, 25 II Not going to allow that. Where is that located? Q. Q. Are you familiar with the 75th precinct? I am. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 48 of 235 Marino - direct D3M9FL01 8 76 1 II A. East New York in Brooklyn. 2 II Q. What's the address of the 75 precinct? 3 II A. 1000 Sutter Avenue. 4 II Q. Can you say it a little slower. 5 II A. 1000 Sutter Avenue. 6 II Q. Sutter? 7 II A. Yes, 8 II Q. And you became the commander of the 75th precinct, did you 9 II not, on or about September of 2002, correct? sir. S-U-T-T-E-R. 10 II A. That would be correct. 11 II Q. And at that time you were a -- an inspector; is that 12 II 13 II A. That's correct. 14 II Q. And is it true -- is it accurate that within months of 15 II becoming the commanding officer of the 75th precinct you 16 II instituted a quota policy that required each officer assigned 17 II to the 75th precinct to issue ten tickets and make one arrest 18 II each month or face a low performance evaluation. 19 II 20 II A. 21 II to meet a quota, no. correct? Is that accurate? The low performance evaluations were not based upon failure 22 THE COURT: That did not quite answer his question. 23 Was there a performance goal of -- what did you say? 24 MR. MOORE: Quota. 25 THE COURT: Ten what? SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 49 of 235 Marino - direct D3M9FL01 MR. MOORE: 2 II II So was there a performance goal of ten arrest. 3 4 Ten tickets -- ten summonses and one THE COURT: 1 8 77 summonses and one arrest? THE WITNESS: 5 As per an administrative guide that was 6 II present at the time, I set the standards as was mandated to me 7 II by the police department, yes. THE COURT: 8 9 II Were those standards ten summonses and one arrest? 10 THE WITNESS: 11 THE COURT: 12 THE WITNESS: 13 THE COURT: Yes. Is that per month? Yes. Per month. 14 II BY MR. MOORE: 15 II Q. And that was a quota, right? 16 II A. Okay thank you. No. 17 THE COURT: You call it a performance goal? 18 THE WITNESS: 19 (Continued on next page) Yes. 20 21 22 23 24 25 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 50 of 235 D3M8FL02 Marino - direct 1 THE COURT: 8 78 Was there any consequence if the goal wasn't met? 2 3 THE WITNESS: 4 THE COURT: 5 THE WITNESS: Yes, there could be. What might that consequence be? They could suffer a low performance 6 II evaluation for failure to perform their job. 7 II Q. 8 II 9 II A. As a result of that, their assignment could be changed, correct? Yes. As per the administrative guide procedure, that's 10 II correct. 11 II Q. 12 II correct? 13 II A. As per the administrative guide procedure, that's correct. 14 II Q. You don't have to add "as per the administrative guide." 15 II If you agree with it, 16 They could, in fact, be transferred out of the command, THE COURT: just say yes or no. If he wants to, that's OK with me. 17 II 18 II performance goals? 19 II A. 20 II 21 II procedure. 22 II Q. 23 II guide, you set performance goals in the 75th Precinct. 24 II that what you just testified to? 25 II A. What section of the administrative guide deals with setting I don't remember the particular section and it's not in the administrative guide anymore; it's now a patrol guide You testified, I thought, that as per the administrative Yes, sir. At that time it was administrative. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---------- Isn't Case 1:08-cv-01034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 51 of 235 D3M8FL02 Marino - direct 879 1 II 2 II your judgment, to set performance goals in the 75th Precinct, 3 II 4 II A. I don't know the numerical section, sir. 5 II Is there now a section of the patrol guide that permits you 6 II to do that? 7 II A. Yes, sir. 8 II What is that? 9 II A. Q. What section of the administrative guide allows you, in if you can recall? Q. Q. I don't know the numerical section, sir. 10 THE COURT: 11 THE WITNESS: 12 MR. MOORE: 13 Can you bring up 285? 14 THE COURT: Is this in evidence? 15 MR. MOORE: It is, Judge. 16 THE WITNESS: 17 THE COURT: 18 II II Yes, I could. One second, Judge. Does it come here? It will. Let me know if it doesn't, but it will I think. 19 You could find that, couldn't you? Did it? 20 THE WITNESS: Yes, it did. 21 II Q. 22 II City Police Department? 23 II A. Yes, sir, 24 II Q. In your judgment, does this order permit you as a 25 II commanding officer of a precinct or command to set numerical Are you familiar with Operations Order 52 of the New York I am. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 D3M8FL02 Filed 05/30/13 Page 52 of 235 880 Marino - direct 1 II 2 II A. 3 II numerical goals. 4 II Q. 5 II quota? 6 II A. 7 II quota. 8 II Q. 9 II performance standards? goals for police officers? No, nothing in the police department authorizes us to set Do you believe that Operations Order 52 allows you to set a Nothing in the police department authorizes us to set a Do you believe that Operations Order 52 allows you to set 10 II A. May P 11 II Q. Yes or no? 12 II A. Yes. 13 THE COURT: Wait. If he wants to read the document. 14 II 15 II A. 16 II wording, but I see it now. 17 II Q. Can you direct us to that language? 18 II A. "To provide guidance I think he started to say, may I look at the document? I know that it does. 19 THE COURT: 20 THE WITNESS: I just couldn't remember the direct Which paragraph are you in? Paragraph 3, ma'am. 21 II A. 22 II duties department managers can and must set performance goals." 23 II Q. 24 II sets forth that officers who don't meet those performance goals 25 II can have adverse employment consequences, "To provide guidance to police officers concerning their You're also aware, are you not, that Operations Order 52 correct? SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 53 of 235 D3M8FL02 Marino - direct 1 II A. I would have to read through it, sir. THE COURT: 2 3 II Q. 8 81 Where is that? Go to the third page. 4 THE COURT: Paragraph? 5 MR. MOORE: Keep scrolling down. 6 Try the fourth page. 7 II 8 II A. Q. Look at number 14 and number 15. Yes, sir. Out loud? THE COURT: 9 Why don't you read those? No. 10 II 11 II A. Yes, 12 II Let me put the question to you again. 13 II Order 52, is it your understanding that precinct commanders or 14 II commanders of different commands can adversely affect the 15 II employment of officers under the command if they fail to meet 16 II the productivity standards that may be set? 17 II A. 18 II what it says, yes, sir. 19 II Q. 20 II they can be subject to adverse employment consequences, 21 II correct? 22 II A. 23 II 24 25 Q. Q. Just to yourself. sir. Based on Operations If they fail to take proper steps to correct conditions is So that if they are not meeting the goals that are set, If they fail to do their jobs in addressing conditions and correcting them, yes. THE COURT: I think actually in 15 it says, II to engage in proactive activity." What is that? SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 "Or fails Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 54 of 235 D3M8FL02 Marino - direct 1 THE WITNESS: 882 Any condition -- a different condition 2 II may take different steps. 3 II whatever the goals are, whatever steps need to be taken to 4 II correct a problem in the community, the officers have to take 5 II it. 6 II Q. So It could be different depending on the condition. I am interested in whether, if a supervisor sets a performance goal 7 Every condition is different. are you following me so far? 8 II A. I am, sir. 9 II Q. If a supervisor sets a performance goal and the officer 10 II fails to meet that performance goal, adverse employment 11 II consequences can be brought against that officer. 12 I am only speaking about performance goals. OK? 13 II they fail to do that, that might subject them to adverse 14 II employment consequences, is that correct? 15 II A. 16 II broad to accurately answer. 17 II Q. 18 II A. If It's too broad of -- the statement you're making is too You can't answer that yes or no? No, sir. THE COURT: 19 I thought he had about ten minutes ago. 20 II You remember a series of questions you asked about the numbers, 21 II and if not, can you do this, can you do that? 22 II all of them. 23 II command. 24 II remember that? 25 Could be reassigned. He said yes to Could have a different Could be assigned to a different precinct. MR. MOORE: I do. I am asking him about 52. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Do you He Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 55 of 235 Marino - direct D3M8FL02 1 II 883 started talking about conditions. THE COURT: 2 I just want to make sure I remember the 3 II 4 II Q. 5 II policy within the 75th Precinct when you were the CO there, 6 II 7 II A. That's correct. 8 II Q. But you were accused of having done that, correct? 9 II A. Yes, 10 II Q. In fact, 11 II 75th Precinct, correct? 12 II A. Yes, 13 II Q. And those officers accused you of instituting a quota 14 II policy that required each officer assigned to the 75th Precinct 15 II to issue ten tickets, ten summonses, and make one arrest each 16 II month or face a low performance evaluation score, correct? 17 II A. same thing. It's your testimony that you did not institute a quota correct? I was. a grievance was filed by several officers in the sir. That is correct. THE COURT: 18 19 II you did, in fact, 20 II Did you not tell us a few minutes ago that officers? say that that was a performance goal for the THE WITNESS: 21 It was, ma'am. We are talking about two 22 II different times and the laws have changed since. 23 II yes, I asked them for ten summonses a month and a collar a 24 II month. 25 THE COURT: At that time, There was a time that you did that? SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 56 of 235 D3M8FL02 Marino - direct 1 THE WITNESS: 2 THE COURT: 3 THE WITNESS: 4 THE COURT: 5 THE WITNESS: 6 THE COURT: 7 THE WITNESS: 8 884 Yes, rna' am. But no longer? Yes, ma'am. When did it change? When the law changed. When was that? I believe it was 2011, if I am not II mistaken. THE COURT: 9 10 What law changed in 2011? THE WITNESS: The quota law at the time that I had the 11 II 12 II transfer an officer, discipline an officer, make him lose 13 II overtime or suffer any loss for failure to meet solely a set 14 II number of parking and moving violations. 15 II just to include movers. 16 II 17 II solely parkers and movers. 18 II correcting the conditions in that community. 19 II Q. 20 II changed in 2011? 21 II A. 22 II parkers, movers, quality of life summonses, arrests, and 23 II UF-250s, yes. 24 II 25 II adversely affect an officer's employment if they didn't meet 75 stated, in sum and substance, that it would be unlawful to Later it was changed The things that I asked the officers for were not Q. It was their aggregate efforts in You say the power for a commanding officer to do that I believe that's when the quota law was changed to include I believe it was 2011. Up until 2011, precinct commanders had the power to SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1 :08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 D3M8FL02 Marino - direct Page 57 of 235 885 1 II those standards or goals, correct? 2 II A. 3 II to write a specified number of parkers and movers within a time 4 II frame, 5 II Q. 6 II A. Yes, as long as it wasn't based solely upon their failure yes. I thought you said that was what changed in 2011? You're not asking me about 2011. THE COURT: 7 You said prior to that. He is saying up till then, if the person didn't meet those goals, they could be adversely affected. 8 THE WITNESS: 9 Yes. 10 II Q. 11 II officers was that officers who had previously received 12 II competent or highly competent ratings began to receive below 13 II competent ratings because they did not achieve the quota that 14 II you set out for them. 15 II 16 II A. That's correct. 17 II You recall an individual at the 75th Precinct named 18 II Christopher Whitehead? 19 II A. Yes. 20 II Q. He worked at the 75th Precinct while you had these goals 21 II in -- withdraw that. 22 II He worked at the 75th Precinct during the time the 23 II officers allege you were imposing a quota on them, correct? 24 II A. Yes, he did. 25 II He was one of the officers who received a below competent One of the allegations that was made by the 75th Precinct That was one of their allegations in the arbitration, correct? Q. Q. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 J Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 58 of 235 D3M8FL02 Marino - direct 8 86 1 II rating because he did not meet what he believed was a quota, 2 II correct? 3 II A. 4 II take your word for it. 5 II Q. 6 II rating, he had a competent or a highly competent rating? 7 II A. No, 8 II If I say so, you will agree with me? 9 II A. I assume you know, sir. 10 II Thank you. 11 II 12 II Christopher Whitehead where he told you he couldn't meet the 13 II quota policy because he was rarely assigned to patrol duty? 14 II you recall a meeting like that? 15 II A. 16 II specifically remember any one officer, no. 17 II Q. 18 II Whitehead, correct? 19 II A. No, 20 II Q. Do you recall telling him that he would be placed on 21 II performance monitoring or he would be terminated if he did not 22 II 23 II A. No, 24 II Do you recall at some point Officer Whitehead shortly 25 II thereafter was placed on level 2 performance monitoring? Q. Q. I don't specifically recall that, but if you say so, I will You recall that before he received a below competent I don't. Yes, sir. Do you recall specifically having a meeting with I met with every officer who was below, but I don't You don't remember that particular meeting with Officer I do not. comply with the quota policy? Q. Do Do you recall telling him that? I don't. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 59 of 235 D3M8FL02 Marino - direct 887 1 II A. 2 II monitoring. 3 II 4 II moni taring? 5 II A. I really don't know. 6 II Q. In addition to Officer Whitehead, there were other 7 II officers, five other Brooklyn officers in the 75th Precinct, 8 II who accused you of having transferred them out of the precinct 9 II because they failed to meet what they alleged was a quota that Q. I don't remember exactly who was placed on performance Do you remember if he was ever placed on performance 10 II 11 II A. I remember that there were officers who said that. 12 II I'm sorry? 13 II A. I remember that there were officers who said that, yes. 14 II A grievance was filed in this matter by the Patrolmen's 15 II Benevolent Association? 16 II A. That's correct. 17 II That was filed in 2005. 18 II A. Yes, 19 II In 2005, were you still the commanding officer of the 75th? 20 II A. Until September of 2005 I was, yes, 21 II Well, when the grievance was filed by the officers, you 22 II were still the commander, right? 23 II A. When it was filed, 24 II When it was decided, you had moved on, 25 II A. you set in the 75th Precinct. Q. Q. Q. Q. Q. Q. Yes, Do you recall that? Do you recall that? sir. sir. I believe I was, yes, sir. correct? sir. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 60 of 235 D3M8FL02 Marino - direct 1 II 2 II point? 3 II A. 888 Q. Because you had been promoted to deputy chief at that I was promoted to deputy chief in December of 2004. 4 THE COURT: 5 THE WITNESS: 6 THE COURT: 7 THE WITNESS: 8 THE COURT: 9 THE WITNESS: Deputy chief of the whole department? No, ma'am. Deputy chief of? Deputy chief is a one star chief. Deputy chief of what? Typically, the one star chiefs are what 10 II 11 II officer is a two star and his number two is a one star. is called the executive officer of a borough. 12 THE COURT: 13 THE WITNESS: 14 THE COURT: 15 THE WITNESS: 16 THE COURT: 17 THE WITNESS: 18 THE COURT: The commanding Your borough was? I was Brooklyn North at that time. Now you are? Staten Island. But also deputy chief of that borough? Yes, ma'am. Thank you. 19 II Q. 20 II still for a time the commanding officer of the 75th Precinct? 21 II A. Yes, sir. 22 II They were waiting for an opening for you or something? 23 II A. Yes, sir. 24 II At some point an arbitration hearing was held, correct? 25 II A. Q. Q. In 2005, after you were promoted to deputy chief, you were Yes, sir. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01034-SAS-HBP Document 288 D3M8FL02 Filed 05/30/13 Page 61 of 235 889 Marino - direct 1 II Q. You testified, 2 II A. Yes, sir. 3 II Q. You were represented by counsel at that hearing? 4 II A. Yes, 5 II Q. In January of 2006, 6 II had imposed a quota policy during the time you were commanding 7 II officer of the 75th Precinct and that it violated Labor Law 8 II Section 215-A, correct? 9 II A. right? sir. the arbitrator ruled that, in fact, you That was part of her ruling, yes, sir. 10 II Q. 11 II were unfairly penalized under the policy that had been ruled in 12 II violation of the labor law, that they could be reevaluated 13 II without reference to the quota policy, correct? 14 II A. That's correct. 15 II But by the time that ruling was made, 16 II had become the executive officer -- 17 II A. Executive officer. 18 II Q. Executive officer of the entire patrol borough Brooklyn 19 II North, 20 II A. Yes. 21 II Q. Sometimes I talk over you and sometimes you talk over me. 22 II So it's better for the court reporter if we can both slow down 23 II a little bit. II you had moved on and correct? I t will help her out. Chief Marino, 24 25 Q. The arbitration decision permitted officers, who felt they I know it's a different borough. is the 42nd Precinct? SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Where Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 62 of 235 D3M8FL02 Marino - direct 890 1 II A. It's in the Bronx. 2 II Q. Are you aware that since 2008, supervisors in the 42nd 3 II Precinct have developed and implemented a system of quotas 4 II mandating numbers for arrests, summonses, and stop and frisks? 5 II A. I only know what I read in the newspapers. 6 II But you read about that in the newspaper, correct? 7 II A. Q. Yes, sir. 8 THE COURT: Is that your borough? Where is the 42nd? 9 MR. MOORE: It's in the Bronx, Judge. 10 THE COURT: Go ahead. 11 The point is you had no chain of command at the Bronx? 12 THE WITNESS: No. 13 II Q. You became aware of it through the newspapers, right? 14 II A. Yes, sir. 15 II In 2008, do you know who the commanding officer of the 42nd 16 II Precinct was? 17 II A. I do not. 18 II Q. The 42nd Precinct is in what borough? 19 II A. The Bronx. 20 II It's just patrol borough Bronx, it's not divided up? 21 II A. No, sir. 22 II Q. Who was the executive officer of the patrol borough Bronx 23 II 24 II A. 25 II Unick and Deputy Chief Terry Monahan. Q. Q. in 2008? I believe, if I am not mistaken, it was Deputy Chief Kevin SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 - ·- - -- --------------- Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 D3M8FL02 Filed 05/30/13 Page 63 of 235 891 Marino - direct 1 II Q. What is the first one? 2 II A. Kevin Unick, U-N-I-C-K. 3 II Executive officers of the boroughs sometimes get together 4 II and meet, correct, or do they? 5 II A. Q. I'm sorry? 6 7 THE COURT: Do you know these guys because sometimes II you have meetings of all the executive officers? 8 THE WITNESS: 9 THE COURT: 10 THE WITNESS: 11 THE COURT: 12 I didn't get the last name. No. I came on the job with Kevin Unick. And the other fellow? I just know him from the job. You don't have meetings of executive II officers? 13 THE WITNESS: No, ma'am, I don't. 14 II Q. 15 II officers might be meeting in one room together, maybe with 16 II their borough chiefs? 17 II Marino that you can recall? 18 II A. Are you talking about from different boroughs? 19 II Yes. 20 II A. No. 21 II Well, do you ever have occasion to go to CompStat? 22 II A. Yes, 23 II Q. Do you recall that the alleged quota that was being imposed 24 II in the 42nd Precinct was ever discussed at CompStat meetings? 25 II A. Q. Q. Are there no command meetings where all the executive Are there no such meetings, Deputy Chief Other than social events, no. sir. Not in my presence, no. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 D3M8FL02 Filed 05/30/13 Page 64 of 235 892 Marino - direct 1 II Q. You don't recall any mention of it while you were there? 2 II A. No, 3 II Do you recall that one of the -- maybe you read it in the 4 II newspaper, that in order to enforce these quotas, supervisors 5 II in the 42nd Precinct had developed a detailed monitoring system 6 II that included computer reports that used color coding to 7 II categorize officers in terms of their compliance with the 8 II quotas? 9 II A. No, 10 II Q. Did you ever have such a system when you were at the 75th 11 II Precinct? 12 II A. No, sir. 13 II Q. To keep track of whether officers were meeting their 14 II performance goals or numerical goals? 15 II A. Not a color code, no, 16 II Q. Did you have some kind of system to track that? 17 II A. Yes, 18 II What was that system? 19 II A. 20 II required to personally review every police officer's activity 21 II 22 II would be at the end of March, June, September and December, 23 II you're required to look at the quarterly evaluations for the 24 II previous quarter and sign off on them that you agree. 25 II Q. Q. sir, sir, I don't. I don't. sir. sir. At the end of each month, the commanding officer is sheet, monthly activity sheet. Q. And on the quarterlies, which That's how you kept track of how officers did in terms of SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 65 of 235 D3M8FL02 Marino - direct 893 1 II meeting their performance goals, correct? 2 II A. 3 II complaints gave me a good indication if the job was getting 4 II done. 5 II Q. 6 II whether they were meeting them. 7 II issues that you deal with, but with respect to whether officers 8 II were meeting these performance goals that you set, that's how 9 II you kept track of them, by looking at these monthly and That based with the crime conditions and community I am speaking specifically about the goals that were set, I know that there are other 10 II quarterly and annual reports, correct? 11 II A. Yes, sir. 12 II Q. If officers you believed fell below what you thought was 13 II the goal that you had set for them, they would be spoken to, 14 II correct? 15 II A. Yes, sir. 16 II Q. They would be told to get their numbers up? 17 II A. Told to do their job properly. 18 II Q. Told to get their numbers up? 19 II A. To do their job properly. 20 21 THE COURT: Did that include getting the numbers where II you wanted them? 22 THE WITNESS: If it was called for, yeah. 23 II Q. 24 II at this point you're still the -- let me ask you, in December 25 II 2010, were you still the executive officer of patrol borough Now, in December of 2010, Deputy Chief Marino, once again, SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 D3M8FL02 Filed 05/30/13 Page 66 of 235 894 Marino - direct 1 II Brooklyn North? 2 II A. I was, sir. 3 II Q. In December 2010, did you become aware that officers 4 II assigned to the 79th precinct became so upset over alleged 5 II summons quotas, that they talked about not writing summonses 6 II for a 24-hour period in protest? 7 8 MS. PUBLICKER: THE COURT: II Where is the 79th Precinct, what borough MR. MOORE: II It is a borough in Brooklyn that he has is that? 11 12 supervisory authority over. 13 THE COURT: 14 MS. PUBLICKER: 15 He is asking about other II precincts. 9 10 Objection. II If it's Brooklyn, I am going to allow it. At this time, he does not have supervisory -- 16 THE COURT: I know not at this time. He did up to a 17 II point in time. 18 II 19 II precincts that you supervised as the executive officer of 20 II patrol borough Brooklyn North, correct? 21 II A. Q. In December 2010, the 79th Precinct was one of the Yes, sir, it is. THE COURT: 22 That's why I am allowing it. 23 II 24 II A. That's Bedford-Stuyvesant. 25 II In Brooklyn? Q. Q. Where is the 79th Precinct? SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, (212) 805-0300 P.C. Case 1:08-cv-01034-SAS-HBP Document 288 D3M8FL02 Filed 05/30/13 Page 67 of 235 895 Marino - direct 1 II A. Brooklyn North. 2 II Q. You heard about this protest, did you not? 3 II A. I read something in the paper, yes. 4 II Q. 5 II 6 II A. You heard about it and you went to the 79th Precinct, correct? 7 II Q. Yes, I did. And you went to the 79th Precinct and you told the officers 8 II there that if they did what they said they were going to do, 9 II which was to go on a 24-hour protest, you could come down there 10 II and make sure they wrote summonses? 11 II A. That's not accurate. 12 II What is not accurate about that? 13 II A. That's not what I told them. 14 II Is any of that accurate? 15 II A. No. 16 II Q. Do you recall what you said to them when you went down 17 II 18 II A. In sum and substance, yes, 19 II What did you say to them? 20 II A. 21 II nothing was about numbers. 22 II weren't numbers; they were people that had bad things happen to 23 II them, and that it's a cop's job to stop it. 24 II that any of us, morally or professionally, should reconcile 25 II himself, because maybe we don't get enough money or we don't Q. Q. there to talk to these officers? Q. I do. I stood in front of roll call and I explained to them that That these little dots on the wall And I don't think SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 68 of 235 D3M8FL02 Marino - direct 896 like our boss, that we let a little kid get shot or a woman get 1 II 2 II robbed to further some kind of agenda. 3 II 4 II A. No, 5 II Q. The protest was about them saying they were being forced to 6 II write a certain number of summonses, right, that was what the 7 II protest was about that drew you to go to the 79th Precinct, 8 II correct? 9 II A. Q. You didn't speak to them about numbers? I did not. What drew me to go there is the officers saying they were 10 II not going to do their jobs, which would put the community at 11 II risk. 12 THE COURT: 13 THE WITNESS: What were they protesting? I don't remember what they were angry 14 II about. 15 II I think that's what it was about. 16 17 THE COURT: You don't think they were protesting about II the numbers? THE WITNESS: 18 19 I don't think they liked their commanding officer, and II Q. No. Let me show you if I can maybe refresh your recollection 20 MS. PUBLICKER: 21 MR. MOORE: 22 23 24 25 Can I see that exhibit? It's not an exhibit. I am going to try to II refresh his recollection. MS. PUBLICKER: Even if he wants to refresh his II recollection. THE COURT: You are right. Show her. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 69 of 235 D3M8FL02 Marino - direct 1 II 2 897 II recollection? What are you going to show him to refresh his 3 4 MR. MOORE: I am going to show him a newspaper article II to see if it refreshes his recollection. 5 THE COURT: You can show anything to see if it 6 II refreshes his recollection. 7 II Q. 8 II finish reading it Chief Marino, take a look at that and read it, and when you THE COURT: 9 He is going to ask you whether it 10 II refreshes your recollection. 11 II A. The answer is either yes or no. Yes, sir, I read it. 12 THE COURT: 13 Does it refresh your recollection? THE WITNESS: It refreshes my recollection as to what 14 II was written after it happened. 15 THE COURT: 16 II Does it refresh your recollection of the actual events? 17 THE WITNESS: 18 THE COURT: Yes. So now that his recollection is refreshed, 19 II what is your question? 20 II Q. 21 II you told these officers, in sum and substance, just try it -- 22 So you now recall that when you went to the 79th Precinct, referring to this not writing summonses for 24 hours 23 II come down here and make sure you write them. 24 II saying that to them? 25 II A. That's inaccurate. I will Do you now recall I never said that. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 70 of 235 D3M8FL02 Marino - direct 1 2 THE COURT: II THE WITNESS: THE COURT: THE WITNESS: II I think I told you what happened, when I said what I told them when I went down there. THE COURT: 9 10 I asked you if it refreshed your II recollection as to what actually happened. 7 8 It refreshes my recollection that that II was somebody' s account of what happened the day after. 5 6 It what does it refresh your recollection then? 3 4 898 The article does not refresh your II recollection as to what actually happened? 11 THE WITNESS: 12 THE COURT: No, it does not. Thank you. 13 II Q. 14 II the officers in the 79th Precinct, what is quoted in the 15 II newspaper there, correct? 16 II A. That's correct. 17 II Now, during the time you were the executive officer of 18 II patrol borough Brooklyn North, you also supervised the 8lst 19 II Precinct, correct? 20 II A. Yes, 21 II Q. How many precincts were under your supervision? 22 II A. Ten. 23 II Q. During the time you were the executive officer, who was the 24 II 25 II A. Q. So having read that, you don't recall having said that to sir. commanding officer of Brooklyn North patrol borough? Assistant Chief Joseph F.X. Cunneen. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 71 of 235 D3M8FL02 Marino - direct 1 II Q. I'm sorry? 2 II A. Assistant Chief Joseph F.X. Cunneen. 3 II followed by Assistant Chief Gerald Nelson. 4 II Q. When did Nelson become the CO of patrol borough Brooklyn? 5 II A. I believe in November or December of 2005, I believe. 6 II Q. When did you leave to go to Staten Island? 7 II A. December of 2010. 8 II Q. So for over a little bit over five years, you were the 9 II executive officer for patrol borough Brooklyn North, correct? 10 II A. That would be correct. 11 II Q. When you were the executive officer, were you aware of a 12 II procedure that could be followed whereby officers could be 13 II brought up to a personnel review board for potential transfer 14 II due to being a substandard performer? 15 II procedure? 16 II A. Yes, sir. 17 II Q. Part of being substandard would include not being 18 II productive in terms of the number of arrests, summonses, or 19 II 250s that are generated, that's part of it, right? 20 II A. 21 II Q. 22 II executive officer of patrol borough Brooklyn North, did you 23 II become aware that there were quotas or productivity goals in 24 II existence, with regard to summonses, arrests and 250s, at the 25 II 81st Precinct, did you become aware of that? 899 And then he was Were you aware of such a That could contribute, yes. Now, with regard to the 8lst Precinct, while you were the SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 72 of 235 D3M8FL02 Marino - direct 1 II A. I assume there were productivity goals, yes, sir. 2 II Q. I am asking if you can answer the question whether there 3 II are quotas or productivity goals with regard to summonses, 4 II arrests and 250s. 5 II A. 9oo Did you become aware of that? No. 6 THE COURT: 7 THE WITNESS: 8 THE COURT: 9 THE WITNESS: 10 11 THE COURT: II What precinct did you say? 81. Is that in your borough? It was at the time. You never became aware of that at any time? 12 THE WITNESS: No. 13 II Q. 14 II on August 30, 2010 concerning matters arising out of the 81st 15 II Precinct? 16 II A. 17 Do you recall giving a statement to the police department No, sir. THE COURT: We will pick up there after. We will have 18 II 19 II 20 II 21 II Q. 22 II you become aware that there are quotas, productivity goals with 23 II regard to summonses, arrests and 250s, did you become aware of 24 II that public? 25 a ten minute recess and reconvene at 20 of. (Recess) BY MR. MOORE: Deputy Chief Marino, with regard to the 81st Precinct, did MS. GROSSMAN: Objection. Compound question. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Is it Case 1:08-cv-01034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 73 of 235 D3M8FL02 Marino - direct 1 II quotas, productivity goals? 2 3 901 MR. MOORE: It will be clear why the question is II phrased that way, depending on his answer. 4 THE COURT: I agree with Ms. Grossman. Don't use 5 II both. 6 II Q. 7 II there were quotas with regard to summonses, arrests and 250s? 8 II A. 9 II Q. Use one or the other or do them separately. With regard to the 81st Precinct, did you become aware that No. Did you become aware that there were productivity goals 10 II with regard to summonses, arrests and 250s? 11 II A. No. 12 13 THE COURT: II number goals? 14 15 In the 81st Precinct, there were not THE WITNESS: II there were. I was not aware of any specific, no. MR. MOORE: 16 I tried to answer before that I assume Judge, let me just pose it this way then. 17 II Q. 18 II from the officers on a monthly basis? 19 II A. No. 20 II Do you recall on August 30, 2010 giving a sworn statement 21 II to a representative of the New York City Police Department 22 II 23 Q. Did you become aware that certain numbers were expected concerning matters having to do with the 8lst Precinct? MS. GROSSMAN: Your Honor, plaintiffs and defendants 24 II worked out an arrangement in terms of what the exhibit is that 25 II Mr. Moore is going to show the witness, and it will probably SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 74 of 235 D3M8FL02 Marino - direct 1 II facilitate if he can show the witness the exhibit to refresh 2 II 902 his memory. 3 4 MR. MOORE: II A. I don't know what you're talking about. 5 6 MS. GROSSMAN: II 7 II document. THE COURT: II Plaintiffs' counsel and defendants' counsel worked out something regarding this particular 8 9 I am waiting for the answer. I think Mr. Moore is planning to show it to him. 10 MS. GROSSMAN: He should show him. 11 II Q. 12 II 13 II A. Thank you, sir. 14 II Q. And see if you can recognize that. 15 II A. I know what it's about now, sir. Let me hand you what has been marked as Plaintiffs' Exhibit 299, Chief Marino. 16 MR. MOORE: Do you want a hard copy, Judge? 17 THE COURT: Sure. 18 MS. GROSSMAN: Thank you. I would just note this is not your 19 II 20 II a lot of inaudibles and not everything is captured, and there 21 II is a lot of misuse of words. 22 II for the record. 23 II Q. 24 II correct? 25 II A. typical transcription of a deposition transcript, and there is So I just wanted that to be clear This is a statement you gave back in August of 2010, Yes, sir. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 75 of 235 D3M8FL02 Marino - direct 1 II Q. 2 II correct? 3 II A. Yes, 4 II Q. The same oath that you took when you got up here today to 5 II testify, correct? 6 II A. Yes, sir. 7 II Q. Directing your attention to page 65 of the transcript, 8 II which you can either look at it in terms of 65 of the 9 II 9 03 At the time, you had taken an oath to tell the truth, sir. transcript or 24435, the Bates stamp number. 10 II A. 11 II 12 II 13 II Marino has just testified to, the portion that Mr. Moore would 14 II I have it. MS. PUBLICKER: improper impeachment. THE COURT: II I would object to this as this is It's not in opposition to what Chief like to read. 15 16 Yes, sir, Q. I don't know that unless I read 24435. Do you recall being asked this question -- 17 THE COURT: 18 MR. 19 THE COURT: That's where I am reading. 20 THE COURT: It seems to be consistent. MOORE: I am reading it to myself. Line 12 to line 19. He says he is 21 aware that there were goals, but he doesn't know the numbers. 22 That's what I think he just said here. The last thing he said 23 II was he knows that number goals were set, but he doesn't know 24 II the numbers. 25 MR. MOORE: He said he wasn't aware of quotas. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 He Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 76 of 235 D3M8FL02 Marino - direct 904 wasn't aware of productivity goals. 1 2 THE COURT: Here today? 3 MR. MOORE: He just said that. 4 THE COURT: He also said, I was aware that there were number goals set, but I don't know the numbers. 5 MR. MOORE: 6 For what it's worth, I would like to ask him whether he was asked that question and gave that answer. 7 THE COURT: 8 I won't allow it. 9 II here. 10 II said the same thing here. 11 II 12 He said the same thing II were set but you don't know the numbers? That's my recollection. That's improper. I believe he But we can find out. Did you just testify that you were aware that numbers 13 THE WITNESS: 14 THE COURT: Yes, ma'am, I did. OK. 15 II 16 II there were quotas, was your answer, I am aware that there were 17 II quotas? Q. When you were asked that question, were you aware that THE COURT: 18 You didn't say you were aware of the word 19 II quotas. 20 II didn't know the number, is that true? You said you knew that number goals were set, but you 21 THE WITNESS: 22 THE COURT: Here did you use the word quotas? 23 MR. MOORE: I am trying to explain why I think it's a 24 25 II Yes. relevant question. THE COURT: I am asking you, did he use the word SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Marino - direct D3M8FL02 1 Page 77 of 235 9o5 II quotas? 2 MR. MOORE: Yes. 3 THE COURT: What page is it? 4 MR. MOORE: Page 65, 5 II 19. line 12, going to the end of line It's a compound question. 6 THE COURT: I see that. 7 All right. I will let you read through the first 8 II sentence of 17. 9 II sentence of 17. Go ahead. Read from line 12 through the first 10 II Q. 11 II least in part, this answer on August 30, 2010, Chief Marino? 12 II "Q. 13 II Precinct. 14 II with this time frame, did you become aware that there are 15 II quotas, productivity goals with regard to summonses, arrests 16 II and 250s, in other words, certain numbers they expect to on a 17 II monthly basis? 18 II 19 II 20 II that answer on August -- 21 II 22 II "A. Do you recall being asked this question and giving, at I am going to direct your attention back to the 81st With regard to the 81 itself, and we are going to go I am aware of that." Do you recall being asked that question and giving MS. PUBLICKER: sentence in response. I just ask that he complete the He did not complete his response. 23 THE COURT: Because I said he could only read through 24 II the first sentence. 25 II would like the whole answer read, that's fine with me, but he That was not Mr. Moore's fault. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 If you Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 78 of 235 Marino - direct D3M8FL02 1 II 906 was only obeying my order. 2 Go ahead. Read the whole answer. 3 II "A. I am aware of that. 4 II administrative guy, now it is the patrol guy, to set the 5 II performance parameters in their own command units." 6 II A. 7 II Q. 8 II 9 II A. Yes, 10 II Q. You were being examined at that point by a member of the 11 II New York City Police Department, correct? 12 II A. Yes, 13 II Q. Were you aware what the parameters were for the numbers in 14 II the 8lst Precinct? 15 II A. As it says on the next page, no, 16 II Q. Without regard to the document at this point, 17 II independent of the document if you would, were you aware of 18 II what the parameters were in the 8lst Precinct? 19 II A. I was not. 20 II Q. During the period of time -- withdraw. 21 II 22 II the executive officer who supervised the 8lst Precinct, 23 II correct? 24 II A. Yes, 25 II Q. And it's your testimony you weren't aware of what the It's guide. Commanders have the right, I am just correcting it. Do you recall being asked that question and giving that answer in August of 2010? sir. sir. Were you aware of that? I was not. just This is discussing the 8lst Precinct while you were sir. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 79 of 235 D3M8FL02 Marino - direct 907 1 II numbers were? 2 II A. That's correct. 3 II Q. In your experience in the New York City Police Department, 4 II would it be normal for a precinct commander to have certain 5 II productivity expectations of his officers? 6 II A. It's actually mandated that he does, yes. 7 II Q. It's in the patrol guide now? 8 II A. It's in the order you just showed before, 9 II Q. Operations Order 52? 10 II A. That would be correct. 11 II Q. That would be a normal thing for precinct commanders to 12 II follow, 13 II A. Yes, 14 II Q. When I say normal, what I am referring to is it would be 15 II normal to have numerical numbers placed on those productivity 16 II standards, correct? 17 II A. No, sir. 18 II Q. Directing your attention to page 66 of this document, on 19 II line 7, do you recall being asked this question and giving this 20 II answer to a representative of the New York City Police 21 II Department on August 30, 2010: 22 II "Q. 23 II those productivity standards? 24 II "A. 25 sir. right? sir. Would it be normal to have numerical numbers placed on Yes, that is right." Do you recall being asked that question and giving SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01034-SAS-HBP Document 288 D3M8FL02 Filed 05/30/13 Page 80 of 235 908 Marino - direct 1 II that answer in August of 2010? 2 II A. Yes, 3 II You're not aware, are you, of any precinct that doesn't do 4 II the same thing? 5 II A. At this time or at that time? 6 II When you were answering in August of 2010. 7 II A. 8 II didn't have knowledge of every precinct in the city. Q. Q. 9 II Q. sir. I couldn't answer. I was not aware of any precinct, but I Let me direct your attention once again to page 66, 10 II 10. 11 II "Q. 12 II doesn't do that? 13 II line "A. Are you aware of a precinct commanding officer that No, 14 I'm really not." Do you recall being asked that question and giving 15 II that answer? 16 II A. Yes. 17 II Q. In your judgment, it's not only the prerogative, but it's 18 II the policy of the police department for precinct commanders to 19 II set numerical goals? 20 II A. No, 21 II Or numerical numbers? 22 II A. No, 23 II That's not the policy? 24 II A. No, 25 II Q. That's not what Operations Order 52 says? Q. Q. sir. sir. sir. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1 :08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP D3M8FL02 Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Marino - direct Page 81 of 235 1 II A. It does not say numerical numbers, no, 2 II Well, do you recall just answering the question, Would it 3 II be normal to have numerical numbers placed on productivity 4 II standards?, 5 II is right, do you recall that? 6 II A. At that time, yes, sir. 7 II And you say it's now changed? 8 II A. Yes, 9 II 909 When did it change? Q. Q. Q. sir. and the answer you gave at the time was, Yes, that sir. 10 II A. When the law changed. 11 II When what law changed? 12 II A. The law regarding quotas. 13 II Q. When was that, 14 II A. I believe it was 2011. 15 II At least up until 2011, whenever that law changed, that was 16 II the practice, that precinct commanders in all precincts could 17 II Q. Q. in 2011? set numerical goals for productivity standards, right? 18 MS. GROSSMAN: The law changed in 2010. So in terms 19 II 20 II want the record to be clear it's 2010. 21 II 22 II A. I'm sorry, sir? 23 II Q. Whenever the law changed, 2010, 24 II 25 II New York City Police Department had the right to set numerical of the witness's testimony tethered to the law change, Q. I just Can you answer the question? 2011, up until that point, it's your understanding that precinct commanders throughout the SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 D3M8FL02 Filed 05/30/13 Page 82 of 235 91 o Marino - direct 1 II 2 II A. Yes, 3 II Q. But it's your testimony that that changed after that law 4 II 5 II A. Yes, 6 II Q. Looking at Operations Order 52, do you believe that that 7 II 8 II numerical numbers for productivity standards, Operations Order 9 II numbers for productivity standards, correct? sir. changed? sir. also gives the discretion to precinct commanders to set 52? 10 II A. 11 II does not. 12 II Q. 13 II 2010, you were not aware of a precinct that does not do this, 14 II in other words, that does not set numerical goals for 15 II productivity standards, correct? 16 II A. 17 II precincts were doing. 18 II know either way. 19 II Q. Directing your attention again to -- 20 II A. I couldn't be knowledgeable what a precinct in the Bronx 21 II was doing or Staten Island or Brooklyn South or Queens or 22 II Manhattan because that wasn't under my jurisdiction and it 23 II didn't concern me. 24 II Q. 25 I don't have it in front of me, but as I recall, no, In fact, it at the time you gave your testimony in August of I wasn't aware or unaware. I didn't know what other I said, no, I'm really not. Directing your attention to page 66, MS. PUBLICKER: I didn't line 10 -- This is improper impeachment. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 It's Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 83 of 235 D3M8FL02 Marino - direct 1 II 911 not inconsistent with his testimony here today. 2 THE COURT: Which sentence do you want to read now? 3 MR. MOORE: I want to read a passage. 4 THE COURT: Just tell me the page and line. 5 MR. MOORE: Page 66, line 10. 6 II "Q. 7 II referring to numerical numbers placed on productivity 8 II standards? 9 II "A. Are you aware of a precinct CO that doesn't do that, No, I'm really not." 10 THE COURT: I will allow it. 11 You gave that testimony, right? 12 THE WITNESS: Yes. 13 II A. 14 II commander wasn't doing it so I assumed they were. 15 II Q. 16 II numerical goals for productivity standards; is that what your 17 II 18 II A. No, it's not. 19 II Isn't that what you just said? Nobody ever came up to me and told me the precinct So nobody in the police department ever told you don't set testimony is? Q. 20 THE COURT: What did you just say? 21 II A. 22 II of any precinct commander that was not setting goals. 23 II Q. 24 II decision that found that while you were in the 75th Precinct 25 II you had set quotas for the number of summonses officers were What I said was no one ever came up to me and made me aware Were you ever disciplined as a result of the arbitration SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 D3M8FL02 Filed 05/30/13 Page 84 of 235 912 Marino - direct 1 II expected to get? 2 II A. No, 3 II Q. Did anybody in the police department ever discuss that with 4 II you, 5 II A. Yes. 6 II Q. Who? 7 II A. Somebody from legal, 8 II commissioner of legal matters or somebody sat me down and 9 II discussed it with me. 10 II Q. 11 II issues there, 12 II police department, Chief Esposito, any assistant chiefs, ever 13 II discuss with you that arbitration decision? 14 II A. I can't recall, 15 II Q. In the patrol borough structure, patrol borough COs report 16 II to the chief of patrol, 17 II A. Correct, 18 II Q. At the time you were in patrol borough Brooklyn North, who 19 II was the chief of patrol? 20 II A. 21 II I can't remember who it was at the time. 22 II Q. 23 II A. 24 II preceding Chief Robert Giannelli. 25 II Q. I was not. that arbitration decision? I believe. It may be deputy I won't go into that because there may be attorney/client but did anybody in the command structure of the no. correct? sir. Was that Giannelli? I don't know if i t was Chief Giannelli or Chief Estavillo. Well, Chief Esposito is the chief of department. No, Estavillo. Nicholas Estavillo was the chief of patrol Did either Chief Estavillo or Chief Giannelli ever discuss SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, (212) 805-0300 P.C. Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 85 of 235 D3M8FL02 Marino - direct 1 II that arbitration decision with you? 2 II A. Not as I recall, no. 3 II Your commanding officer in Brooklyn North, did they ever 4 913 II discuss it with you? Q. 5 A. Not as I recall, no. 6 Q. Your commanding officer at the time was who? 7 A. That would have been Chief Gerald Nelson. 8 Q. Did Nelson ever discuss that arbitration decision with you? 9 A. Not as I recall. 10 II Q. 11 II paramilitary organization? 12 II A. Yes, sir. 13 II Q. Discipline and adherence to orders from commanders is very 14 II important in the functioning of the New York City Police 15 II Department, correct? 16 II A. Yes, sir. 17 II Q. One of the duties of a police officer is to obey lawful 18 II orders and instructions by supervising officers, right? 19 II A. Yes, sir. 20 II Q. And that is set forth right in the patrol guide, right? 21 II A. Yes, sir. MR. MOORE: 22 23 Would you agree with me, Chief, that the NYPD is a II Judge, before I forget, I move the admission of Plaintiffs' Exhibit 299. 24 MS. PUBLICKER: 25 THE COURT: Objection, your Honor. Sustained. I am not going to accept this SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 86 of 235 D3M8FL02 Marino - direct 1 II in evidence. 2 II it, it's been read into the record. 3 II Q. One of the ways officers are given guidance and 4 II supervision, one of the principal ways is through the roll call 5 II system, correct? 6 II A. Yes, 7 II Q. That happens on a daily basis for every tour, correct? 8 II A. Yes, sir. 9 II Q. At roll calls officers are told what the conditions are for 10 II the day, correct? 11 II A. Yes, sir. 12 II Q. They are sometimes given briefings on changes in the law, 13 II correct? 14 II A. Yes, sir. 15 II Q. And new interim orders or policies that are adopted by the 16 II police department, correct? 17 II A. At times, yes, sir. 18 II Q. And from time to time, precinct commanders appear at the 19 II roll call and speak to the simple troops? 20 II A. Yes, sir. 21 II Q. Would you be concerned as a commanding officer if a 22 II supervisor got up at a roll call and said, at a particular 23 II location, no one is walking out of that location without being 24 II stopped? 25 II A. I You used it for impeachment. 914 Where you have used That's fine. sir. Would you be concerned about that? might. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 D3M8FL02 Filed 05/30/13 Page 87 of 235 915 Marino - direct 1 II Q. 2 II house, right? 3 II A. No, sir. 4 II I'm sorry? 5 II A. No, you can't. 6 II Q. In order to stop them, you have to have reasonable 7 II suspicion, correct? 8 II A. Yes, 9 II Of course, Q. Q. That's because you can't just stop anybody walking out of a That's correct, you can't. sir. if you see them committing a crime, you can stop 10 II them, and if you have probable cause, you can arrest them, 11 II 12 II A. Yes, 13 II Q. But just walking out of a house without anything more, 14 II that's not a reason to stop anybody, correct? 15 II A. No, sir, it's not. 16 II Q. No, sir, you agree with that? 17 II A. I agree with what you just said. 18 II Q. So would you be concerned as a commanding officer if a 19 II supervisor got up and said, I want everybody coming out of a 20 II certain location, 21 II you be concerned that that might lead to suspicionless stops 22 II and frisks if the supervisor officer didn't say more than that, 23 II would you be concerned about that? 24 II A. 25 correct? sir. I want everybody stopped on this tour? I might, yes. MR. MOORE: Nothing further, Judge. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Would Case 1 :08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 88 of 235 D3M8FL02 Marino - direct 1 THE COURT: Ms. Publicker. 2 MR. MOORE: Thank you, Chief. 3 THE WITNESS: 916 4 My pleasure. II CROSS-EXAMINATION 5 II BY MS. PUBLICKER: 6 II Q. Good afternoon, Chief. 7 II A. Good afternoon, ma'am. 8 II Q. Could you briefly describe your educational background? 9 II A. I have a bachelor's in business administration from the 10 II State University of New York. 11 II Q. 12 II A. November 7, 13 II Just a little while ago Mr. Moore read to you from a 14 II transcript, is that correct? 15 II A. Yes, rna' am. 16 II Did you ever have a chance to review that transcript? 17 II A. No, ma'am. 18 II Q. I believe you were trying to say something about the 19 II statement, 20 II it's the patrol guy, to set performance parameters in their own 21 II command units"? 22 II A. Q. Q. When did you join the New York City Police Department? 1979. "Commanders have the right, administrative guy, now Yes, ma'am. 23 MR. MOORE: Object to the form of the question. 24 THE COURT: I don't know what you just said. 25 II Q. You attempted to clarify something about that statement to SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 89 of 235 D3M8FL02 Marino - cross 917 1 II Mr. Moore on your direct? 2 II A. Yes, ma'am. 3 II Q. What were you trying to clarify? 4 II A. The administrative guide was the original procedure, now 5 II it's the patrol guide, not guy. 6 II Q. 7 II heard or read about the 42nd Precinct issues that Mr. Moore 8 II asked you about? 9 II A. None. 10 II Q. How long ago did you leave the 75th Precinct? 11 II A. Seven and a half years ago, 12 II Q. Are you familiar with officers' annual performance 13 II evaluations? 14 II A. Yes, ma'am, 15 II Q. There are 28 different subcategories for that evaluation, 16 II are there not? 17 II A. Yes, ma'am. 18 II Q. Those are separated? 19 II A. Yes. 20 II parameters, dimensions they call them. 21 II Q. 22 II Precinct, did you assign mandatory numerical ratings triggered 23 II by certain levels of activity? 24 II A. I t was suggested, 25 II Q. Was that for the overall evaluation score or for the Do you have any personal knowledge of anything that you September of 2005. I am. There are performance parameters and behavioral So when you were the commanding officer of the 75th yes. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 90 of 235 D3M8FL02 Marino - cross 918 1 II subcategories? 2 II A. 3 II particular parameter. 4 II Q. Could you give an example? 5 II A. Yes, 6 II in there with accidents and traffic, 7 II properly issue enough moving summonses in the right places to 8 II stop people that were having accidents and injuries, he might For the subcategories where I felt were affected by that I can. One of the ones I set was, get low in that area. 9 there is something if an officer failed to If an officer failed to do much in the 10 II way of arrests, proactive policing, hawkers, movers, he might 11 II got low in initiative, or problem recognition if he or she 12 II didn't have the ability to see these things that were happening 13 II right in front of their face. 14 II Q. Why did you set these performance goals? 15 II A. The level of activity and the level of performance that the 16 II officers in the 75 were producing when I first got there was so 17 low that it was actually a detriment to the community. It was 18 II doing nothing to improve the conditions in one of the precincts 19 II that was probably one of the most crime ridden violent 20 II precincts in the city. 21 II Q. 22 II Precinct when you first arrived? A. 23 What was the level of activity that you saw in the 75th Surprisingly enough, the 400 or so officers assigned to 24 II patrol all saw exactly five summonses every month, no more, 25 II less, and that was movers, parkers, and quality of life SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 no Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 91 of 235 D3M8FL02 Marino - cross 1 II summonses combined. 2 II 919 five every month. 400 people all managed to seek exactly 3 Q. What did that signal to you? 4 A. It told me that they had set their own quota. 5 Q. Did you believe that was a problem? 6 A. Yes, 7 Q. Why did you believe it was problematic? 8 A. Working in Brooklyn North for 22 years, 9 it was. I knew in some II areas the level of violence and drugs and crime, and these 10 II officers doing five combined, movers, parkers and quality of 11 II life summonses a month was just not enough to fix the problems 12 II there. 13 II 14 II they were driving by things, 15 II almost a malfeasance to me. 16 II 17 II A. 18 II 19 II find and what I could see, arrests that I could make, summonses 20 II that I could write, stops that I could perform, proper stops. 21 II And I did some analysis about the quota law. 22 II the administrative guide and see exactly what was proper to do 23 II and not to do. 24 II would serve the community in a better manner. 25 II Q. And, also, if an officer did that by the third or fourth day of the month and no more, it kind of indicated that Q. just not addressing it. It was What did you do in response, if anything? I analyzed all the crime in the 75th Precinct. I drove around for weeks, myself, in the street to see what I could I did look into And I did set numbers for them that I thought What were the numbers that you set? SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 92 of 235 D3M8FL02 Marino - cross 920 1 II A. 2 II 3 II to attempt to make one arrest a month. 4 II Q. 5 II 6 II A. No. 7 II Q. Why did you set the numbers that you did? 8 II A. When you ask people to do things, number one, the officers 9 II ask for a number, they want one. 10 II they want to know what do I have to do to be OK, what can I do 11 II to meet standards, so they ask for a number. 12 II number, you have to make one that is attainable, that will not 13 II put an undue burden upon the officers or the community, and yet 14 II meet the needs of that community at the same time. 15 II 16 II time? 17 II A. 18 II 19 II there in murders. 20 II I asked them to increase their summons production from five to ten. I asked them to try to make two good stops a month and Did you ever assign a mandatory numerical rating to be triggered by low activity for UF-250s? Q. Most people come to work and And if you set a What were the crime conditions in the 75th Precinct at that The 75th Precinct historically and at that time still almost every year led the city in shootings, robberies, up It was heavy drugs. THE COURT: 21 THE WITNESS: Where is this? That's East New York in Brooklyn. 22 II 23 II heavy crime. 24 II Q. 25 II State labor law that was in effect at the time? It's a five and a half square mile area that's heavily populated and I believe you stated that you were aware of a New York SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 D3M8FL02 Filed 05/30/13 Page 93 of 235 9 21 Marino - cross 1 II A. Yes, ma'am, 2 II Did you believe that your mandatory ratings in certain 3 II dimensions violated the New York State labor law at that time? 4 II A. No, 5 II Q. Was anyone transferred out of the 75th Precinct as a result 6 II of the performance standards that you set? 7 II A. Yes, ma'am. 8 II Q. Was anyone denied overtime as a result of the performance 9 II standards that you set? 10 II A. 11 II Q. 12 II 13 II A. No. 14 II You're aware that a grievance was filed against NYPD for 15 II that practice? 16 II A. Yes, ma'am. 17 II Do you recall when that grievance was filed? 18 II A. 19 II document that the lawyer gave me, that counsel gave me. 20 II Q. 21 II 75th Precinct? 22 II A. 23 II statement on August-- is that August 2010? 24 II just confused it. 25 II Q. Q. I was. I did not, and I still don't. No. Was anyone denied days off as a result of the performance standards that you set? Q. Q. I believe it was in October of '10, according to the When the grievance by the PBA was filed with regards to the I don't know when it was filed. I know that I gave my No, I'm sorry. I don't remember when it was done. What did you understand the grievance to include? SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 I Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 94 of 235 D3M8FL02 Marino - cross 922 1 II A. 2 II taken off their tours and made to suffer a loss, or get 3 II substandard evaluations, based solely on their refusal to write 4 II a certain amount of moving or parking summonses within a 5 II specified time frame. 6 II Q. Are you aware of the findings of the arbitrator? 7 II A. Yes, ma'am, 8 II Q. How are you aware of those findings? 9 II A. The officers grieved the fact that they were transferred or Well, I am. I read them, and then it was given to me also by the 10 II department at some point in time. 11 II Q. 12 II recall? 13 II A. I can't recall. 14 II Q. If I said it was 2006, would that refresh your 15 II recollection? 16 II A. Yes, rna' am. 17 II Q. Did the arbitrator determine whether anyone had received a 18 II low evaluation as a result of the alleged quota? 19 II A. 20 II standard evaluation as a result of that, no. 21 II Q. Do you recall an Officer Velez? 22 II A. Yes, 23 II Q. Do you recall that he made a grievance against you? 24 II A. Yes, ma'am, 25 II As part of that same labor law grievance we were speaking Q. When did the arbitrator release the findings, if you can I don't think she determined that anybody received a below I do, David Velez. I do. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 95 of 235 D3M8FL02 Marino - cross 923 1 II of? 2 II A. Yes, ma'am. 3 II Q. Do you recall that he claimed that he received a low 4 II 5 II A. Yes, rna' am. 6 II Q. What was the low evaluation that he was alleged to have 7 II received? 8 II A. He received a 3.5, which is above standards. 9 II Q. After you received the arbitration decision in 2006, did 10 II you continue to impose those mandatory ratings for officers? 11 II A. No, rna' am. 12 II Q. You are aware that the labor law was amended again in 2010? 13 II A. Yes, ma'am. 14 II What is your current understanding of the kinds of quotas 15 II that are not permitted under New York State Labor Law? 16 II A. 17 II police officer to suffer any kind of monetary loss, change of 18 II tour, change of assignment, for failure to produce a specified 19 II number of moving summonses, parking summonses, quality of life 20 II violations, UF-250s, or stop and frisks, or arrests within a 21 II specified time frame. 22 II Q. 23 II Labor Law? 24 II A. Yes, ma'am. 25 II Q. Are you aware if the arbitrator found that Officer evaluation? Q. You cannot suffer any police officer, you cannot cause any Do you currently comply with the existing New York State SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 96 of 235 D3M8FL02 Marino - cross 924 1 II Whitehead, which was mentioned by Mr. Moore, was retaliated 2 II against in any way? 3 II A. No, she did not. 4 II Q. How many times have you attended CompStat? 5 II A. I would say over 100. 6 II Q. Has anyone at CompStat ever told you to increase the number 7 II of stops officers under your command conduct? 8 MR. MOORE: Object to the form, 10 THE COURT: He is on cross. 11 MR. MOORE: I called him as an adverse witness. 12 THE COURT: It calls for a yes or no. 9 Judge. He is on II direct. 13 II 14 II it. II 15 I will allow Did anyone from CompStat ever tell you that? A. No. Not just to increase the number of stops, no. 16 MR. MOORE: Can I just have the question read back? 17 THE COURT: Sure. 18 (Record read) 19 II A. No. 20 II Has anyone at CompStat ever told you to increase the number 21 II of arrests officers under your command conduct? 22 II A. No, not just arbitrarily like that, no. 23 II Q. Has anyone at CompStat ever told you to increase the number 24 II of summonses officers under your command conduct? 25 II A. Q. No. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 97 of 235 D3M8FL02 Marino - cross II 925 Q. What have they told you at CompStat about officer activity? 2 II A. The main thing that you hear a lot at CompStat is they talk 1 3 II 4 II ever said they want more numbers for numbers' sake. 5 II do things like they can put up the computer maps and show 6 II robberies up in this area. 7 II 8 II taking proper steps to stop the conditions. 9 II about quality over quantity. activity in this area. Nobody from the top on down has They can And then they will show a lot of No, it should be here. You're not Nobody would ever just arbitrarily say they need to make more arrests, they need 10 II to write more summonses. 11 II enough in this area to address this condition, and how come 12 II you're not? 13 II You're not taking the proper steps. 14 II as a commanding officer of that precinct to fix the conditions 15 II for the people that live there. 16 II They might say you're not doing You're not deploying your men and women properly. You're not doing your job (Continued on next page) 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. ------------------------ (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 D3m9flo3 Filed 05/30/13 Page 98 of 235 926 Marino - cross 1 II Q. Just to step back for a minute, for the time when you were 2 II the commanding officer of the 75th precinct. 3 II stated that you drove around the precinct? 4 II A. 5 II Q. 6 II summonable offenses when you did that? Yes, I did, I believe you for quite a few weeks. Did you find it difficult to identify crime conditions or 7 MR. MOORE: Object to the form, 8 THE COURT: Are you objecting to the leading? 9 MR. MOORE: Not only that. judge. She's asking him this 10 II broad question about whether he saw illegal behavior. 11 II did he stop and summons? 12 THE COURT: She's not asking that. 13 II Did you notice it? 14 II I mean She's just saying: guess that's the question. Did you see it? 15 MS. PUBLICKER: 16 THE WITNESS: Was it hard to see it? I Yes, your Honor. Actually honestly I found it hard to go 17 II a couple of hours without seeing something. 18 II Q. 19 II could not set quotas? 20 II A. Yes, 21 II What did you tell them? 22 II A. 23 II that they can't do. 24 II 25 II should not ask for numbers, for numbers' sake? Q. Q. Have you ever told supervisors under your command that they I have. I tell them whatever the law is at the time. The things Have you ever told supervisors under your command that they SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 99 of 235 D3m9flo3 Marino - cross 927 1 II A. 2 II 3 II Q. 4 II 5 II A. 6 II file that they think they have to get numbers for numbers' sake 7 II and it doesn't help anything. 8 II 9 II mean expired registration stickers or expired inspection I've been saying that since day one irregardless of what the law stated. And why do you say that to commanding officers under your command? Because the perception sometimes is amongst the rank and If I say I want you guys to write parkers, I don't 10 II 11 II write some double parkers where they're selling drugs and the 12 II people are double parking their cars. 13 II induce them not to come back. 14 II you can't get down the block because there's a condition, 15 II address that. stickers that don't really do much. 16 But I would like you to Maybe it will kind of Or if you're coming to work and Quality of life summonses. Address the things that 17 II you wouldn't like in your neighborhood or for your family to 18 II have to live with. 19 II 20 II thing like they stop a car with tinted windows and give them 21 II four summonses, one for each window, and I'm done for the 22 II month. 23 II happening, people are getting hurt. 24 II summons fro no seat belt, or on the cellphone, or speeding, or 25 II improper turn, or failure to yield to a pedestrian. If you're going to give moving summonses, don't do a Make four good stops. Go to where the accidents are I'd rather see them write SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Because Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 100 of 235 D3m9flo3 Marino - cross 928 1 II where I work now there's a lot of pedestrians that get rundown. 2 II 3 II 4 II patrol cop, if you talk about productivity or numbers, as we 5 II keep saying, the numbers that they give are so low that it's 6 II incumbent upon them to make sure that everything they did 7 II actually go out and perform has a positive effect. 8 II Q. 9 II did you -- I'm sorry. It's a problem. It's our job to fix this. The simple truth of the matter is that the average When you were the commanding officer of the 75th precinct Were you involved with the community? 10 II A. Yes, rna' am. 11 II How were you involved with the community? 12 II A. 13 II 14 II You meet with elite clergy people. 15 II sorry -- monthly precinct community council meetings where 16 II everybody is invited to attend. 17 II 18 II early on in my tenure and asked them what they thought the 19 II priorities in the community were, the problems that they 20 II thought were the most important. 21 II we could remedy them. 22 II 23 II going to do this. 24 25 Q. When you first go to a precinct you meet with all the elected officials. I You meet with block association presidents. And you have weekly -- I'm also invited in elected officials and clergy people We discussed between us how Because you can't go into a community and just say well I'm going to tell you how to live and I'm When I was in the 77, there was a bad area. II decided to go zero tolerance to fix it. We I invited all the SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 101 of 235 D3m9flo3 Marino - cross 929 1 II elected officials, all the community people in first because 2 II I'm not going to subject them to that kind of thing unless they 3 II all are on board and agree with it, and they were. 4 II agreed that that was what was necessary. 5 II of the decision process. 6 II Q. 7 II shown earlier, you testified I believe that officers pursuant 8 II to Operations Order 52 are evaluated on effectiveness of 9 II addressing conditions; is that correct? 10 II A. Yes, rna' am. 11 II Q. And I believe under Operations Order 52 you read some 12 II portions of paragraph fifteen where it states that if officers 13 II fail to address sector or post conditions and public safety 14 II concerns after training, mentoring and hands-on instruction, 15 II the officers could be placed in performance monitoring; is that 16 II correct? 17 II A. Yes, ma'am. 18 II Q. Is that your understanding of the operations order? 19 II A. Yes. 20 II Q. Can you explain what your understanding is of how an 21 II officer could fail to be effective at addressing conditions? 22 II A. 23 II 24 II area it's a known drug location, and they don't do anything 25 II with it. And they They have to be part Now moving on to the Operations Order 52 that you were Yes, ma'am. If you have a drug condition in your precinct, say an And people are complaining that they're out there SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 D3m9flo3 Filed 05/30/13 Page 102 of 235 93 o Marino - cross 1 II selling drugs, 2 II street, they're playing loud radios and just generally causing 3 II a problem and it's in the officer's sector and he does nothing 4 II about it all month, he failed. 5 they're drinking beer, they're urinating in the MS. PUBLICKER: 6 II Your Honor, if I could have one II minute. 7 He failed in that respect. (Pause) 8 9 Thank you, II your Honor. No further questions at this time. 10 THE COURT: Redirect or cross, whatever you want to 12 MR. MOORE: Re-something. 13 THE COURT: If it's that short. 14 MR. MOORE: It's going to be short. 11 II call it? Just can I do it from here? 15 II REDIRECT EXAMINATION 16 II BY MR. MOORE: 17 II Q. 18 II 75th precinct you reached out to the community, correct? 19 II A. Yes. 20 II As any good precinct commander would do, 21 II A. Yes, 22 II Q. And for the five -- the precinct commander of the 75th for 23 II five years, 24 II A. 25 II Q. Chief Marino, Yes, you said that when you became the CO of the correct? sir. correct? s i r - - I'm sorry, no, sir. Three years, ten days, 18 hours. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 and Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 103 of 235 D3m9flo3 Marino - redirect 1 THE COURT: 2 THE WITNESS: 9 31 Where is that? East New York. 75. Three years, ten 3 II days, and 18 hours. 4 MR. MOORE: You don't have it down to the minute? 5 THE COURT: Excuse me. 6 THE WITNESS: 7 THE COURT: 8 THE WITNESS: 9 THE COURT: 10 75? Yes, ma'am. Did you mention earlier 77? 77. Where is that? THE WITNESS: That's in Crown Heights also in Brooklyn 11 II North. 12 II BY MR. MOORE: 13 II Q. 14 II 15 II that your testimony? 16 II A. 17 II 18 II precinct I've worked in. 19 II 20 II would complain about what they believe to be suspicionless 21 II stops and frisks taking place in the 75th precinct, correct 22 II from time to time? 23 II A. Yes, sir. 24 II Q. And what would you do about that? 25 II A. We would discuss it. Is it your testimony that during that time no one in the community came to you to complain about stop and frisk? Is They may have, sir. That is always a concern and a complaint in any Q. So from time to time community leaders, community members We have a dialogue about it and see SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01034-SAS-HBP Document 288 D3m9flo3 Filed 05/30/13 Page 104 of 235 932 Marino - redirect 1 II 2 II mistakes and sometimes the community is mistaken. 3 II 4 II what happened, they actually go: 5 II good job. 6 II if they were right or wrong, you know -- sometimes people make they come in and complain about it. Q. Oh, Sometimes When I explain to them you guys actually did a Would you agree with me that communities like East New York 7 II and Bed-Stuy and Crown Heights where there may be high 8 II incidents of crime, that people in those communi ties want 9 II officers deployed there to deal with those crime conditions? 10 II A. Of course they do. 11 II Q. And from time to time the police department sends extra 12 II officers into those areas to deal with those crime conditions, 13 II correct? 14 II A. I don't know what you-- 15 THE COURT: 16 THE WITNESS: 17 Sometimes police presence is increased. They assign more police officers to the precinct? 18 THE COURT: 19 THE WITNESS: That's what he's asking. Yes. 20 II 21 II time. 22 II A. Oh, 23 II And that -- and so members of the community want that to 24 II happen, correct? 25 II A. Q. Q. Or to deal with a spike in conditions, Yes, yes, sir, say, to impact over sir. I believe they do. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 105 of 235 D3m9flo3 Marino - redirect 93 3 1 II Q. From your experience? 2 II A. I believe they do, yes, sir. 3 II Q. They don't want those officers to go into the community and 4 II do suspicionless stops and frisks though, do they? 5 II A. I'm sorry? 6 II Q. They don't want those officers who they want deployed to 7 II the community to come there and disregard the rights of the 8 II people in that community with regard to stop and frisk, 9 II They don't want that? 10 II A. 11 II Q. 12 II they don't want the officers coming in and stopping and 13 II frisking every young black or Hispanic male, correct? 14 II A. right? Nobody wants illegality, sir. So even though they may not -- they may want more officers, No. 15 That's correct. MS. GROSSMAN: Your Honor, it looks like there are a 16 II few more questions. 17 II THE COURT: I have no trouble hearing him. 18 II MR. MOORE: Do you want me to stand 19 II THE COURT: No, you're doing fine. Maybe Mr. Moore wants to take the podium. Actually finishing would be good. 20 21 II Q. 22 II to the 75th precinct that the numbers were very low, 23 II A. Yes, 24 II Q. From time to time you see in precincts low numbers, 25 II correct? You also testified just now that you thought when you got correct? sir. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 106 of 235 D3m9flo3 Marino - redirect 93 4 1 II A. I don't know about other precincts, sir. 2 II Q. We'll speak about the 75th. 3 II 4 II placed within the precinct to increase those numbers? 5 II A. I wouldn't call it pressure, sir, no. 6 II What would you call it? 7 II A. 8 II weren't doing their jobs. 9 II Q. So what would you call it? 10 II A. I suggested to them that their efforts were not enough to 11 II 12 II needed to do more proactive policing to stop the crime. 13 II 14 II these numbers up or you're going to go to a different precinct 15 II 16 II A. 17 II consequences. 18 II Q. 19 II A. That's right. 20 II So pressure was put on officers to get their numbers up, 21 II right? 22 II A. I don't know if you could call that pressure. 23 II Q. Well if you're a police officer and a deputy chief is 24 II saying or an inspector is saying -- 25 II A. So, if you see low numbers is there not then pressure Q. Those numbers were so low they were almost stopped. They serve that community like they were being paid to and that they Q. You didn't just suggest that. You said essentially get or there's going to be changes, right? Q. I set a standard that said do your jobs or suffer the That's right. Or suffer the consequences, right? The number. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 107 of 235 D3m9flo3 Marino - redirect 93 5 1 II 2 II A. The number I set was so low that I could do it in one day. 3 II Okay. 4 II A. 5 II anybody. 6 II Q. Q. Q. -- or deputy inspector is saying And reasonably do it without hurting anybody or picking on And did you do that when you went around for these months, 7 II did you make stops? 8 II A. Yes, 9 II Q. Did you make arrests? 10 II A. Yes, 11 II So if you saw the numbers were so low, you then made it 12 II very clear to the members of that precinct that they had to get 13 II 14 II A. They had to do their jobs, yes. 15 II Q. And that's when you began to set higher numerical goals, 16 II 17 II A. Yes. 18 II Now, you talked about CompStat. 19 II time when in your experience of CompStat that assembled members 20 II of the police department have discussed whether in a particular 21 II instance an officer had reasonable suspicion to stop somebody 22 II or not? 23 II A. 24 II unreasonable or unnecessary or, you know, doing things just for 25 II numbers. Q. I did. I did. their numbers up, correct? correct? Q. Have there ever been a Had that ever been discussed in your experience? CompStat, yeah, they do discuss stopping -- not making And that has been discussed, yes. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 108 of 235 D3m9flo3 Marino - redirect 936 1 II Q. But you've never done it with an actual 250 there, 2 II A. Not that I recall, no. 3 II Q. And the focus -- would you agree with me that at CompStat 4 II one of the things that's discussed when the focus is on a 5 II precinct is the number of arrests that are being done, correct, 6 II 7 II A. 8 Q. 9 correct? in a period of time? No. Not just in the context for the number of arrests, no. I'm not putting it in context. I'm saying is there a II discussion at CompStat about the number of arrests in a 10 II precinct? 11 II A. In certain instances, yes. 12 II And there's a discussion about the number of summonses as 13 II well, correct? 14 II A. In certain instances, yes. 15 II Have you ever been present when they talked about 250s, 16 Q. Q. saying In certain instances? comparing last year's numbers to this year's numbers 17 II to see if there's an increase or a decrease? 18 II A. No. 19 II That's never happened? 20 II A. No. 21 II Q. Now you talked about -- you answered some questions about 22 II 23 II arbitration, correct? 24 II A. Yeah, 25 II And you testified as a representative of the New York City Q. this arbitration, this grievance. Q. You testified at that I did. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 D3m9f1o3 Filed 05/30/13 Page 109 of 235 93 7 Marino - redirect 1 II 2 II A. Yes. 3 II Q. And the arbitrator ruled against the New York City Police 4 II Department, correct? 5 II A. Yes and no. 6 II Q. Well the arbitrator found that there was a quota system in 7 II the 75th precinct? 8 II A. Yes and no. 9 II What do you mean yes or no? Police Department, correct? Q. 10 II A. What makes a quota illegal is somebody being -- 11 II I'm not asking about illegal. 12 II A. What makes 13 II Q. Arbitrator found that a quota system in the 75th precinct, 14 II correct? 15 II A. No. 16 II I'll accept a yes and no. Q. Q. 17 I'm saying was there Yes and no. Did the city appeal that arbitration decision? 18 II A. Didn't have to. 19 II Did the city appeal that arbitration Q. THE COURT: 20 21 II I guess the -- does that mean the answer is no? THE WITNESS: 22 No. 23 II Q. 24 II were setting their own quotas, 25 II A. Now you said when you got to the 75th precinct the officers it appeared to you, correct? Yes. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 D3m9flo3 Filed 05/30/13 Page 11 0 of 235 93 8 Marino - redirect 1 II 2 II A. Yes. 3 II Q. And that included what? 4 II A. Movers, parkers, quality of life summonses. 5 II How long had that quota system been in place in the 75th 6 II precinct? 7 II A. I have no idea. 8 II Q. For a long time though, correct? 9 II A. I have no idea. 10 II Q. Did you know whether the supervisors in the 75th precinct 11 II were aware of that quota system? 12 II A. I have no idea. 13 II Q. Did you ask the departing CO whether -- anything about that 14 II officer-imposed quota? 15 II A. Nope. 16 II Q. Did you ask -- did you discuss it with anybody in the 75th 17 II precinct? 18 II A. They weren't open to discussion. 19 II Q. Well, it's not likely that the officers could have a 20 II self-imposed five-a-month quota without their supervisors 21 II 22 II A. One would assume. 23 II Q. All you have to do is look at the reports, right? 24 II A. One would assume. 25 II If a commanding officer said that in an evaluation of a Q. Q. Five a month? knowing about it, Q. correct? SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 111 of 235 D3m9flo3 Marino - redirect employee 1 939 of an officer, that 50 percent of your evaluation 2 II 3 II would not be proper, would it? 4 II A. 5 II put a percentage on it. is based on your numbers of arrests, summonses and 250s, that It's part of the evaluation process. 6 II Q. 50 percent. 7 II A. What's the officer doing? 8 II know. 9 II I don't know if you Q. That wouldn't be proper, right? What's his assignment? I don't He's a patrol officer. 10 II A. 11 II 12 II evaluation. 13 II Q. 14 II A. I don't know. 15 II Have you ever imposed a 50 percent rule when evaluating 16 II officers? 17 II A. It's a large part. What an officer does everyday is a large part of his Q. Is it 50 percent? No. No. 18 MR. MOORE: 19 I just want to go back to Exhibit 299. Judge, I think that's all I have. There was a 20 II 21 II of notice to the City of New York, that the city had notice of 22 II the entirety of the contents of Exhibit 299. 23 II think it goes to the issue of notice of the city as to the 24 II plaintiffs' Monell claim, I think it should be admitted into 25 II evidence. stipulation made with the city, and this goes to the question And because I SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 112 of 235 D3m9flo3 Marino - redirect 1 MS. GROSSMAN: 2 II 3 940 That's not what our agreement was but II questions so that's. the witness has testified that the NYPD asked him these 4 5 THE COURT: that purpose, to look at what the city knew at that time. II Because notice is an issue. 8 9 10 But he's saying the whole II transcript is what constitutes notice, and I should read it for 6 II 7 Right. MS. GROSSMAN: That's not relevant, the whole II transcript -- whatever it is that the witness has testified II to -- 11 THE COURT: It was only used here for impeachment. Do 12 II you remember being asked this question and giving this answer? 13 II That's when I said it can't be admitted because we don't do 14 II that. 15 II record. 16 II 17 II city is receiving this transcript at a certain time which shows 18 II notice. Now there's an different argument entirely, that the MS. GROSSMAN: 19 20 We just have the question and answer read into the It's not that we received it. The II police department asked the questions. 21 THE COURT: Same idea. Whatever it is, he's saying 22 II everything in that transcript is proof of notice of what the 23 II 24 II the Monell issues, when the city knew certain things. 25 city knew at a certain point in time. MR. MOORE: And that's important to And they stipulated to it. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 That's why we Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 113 of 235 D3m9flo3 Marino - redirect 9 41 1 II redacted the whole thing and agreed to this whole procedure of 2 II taking something out. 3 II don't say they stipulated to it because I thought that's what 4 II they stipulated to. I'm quite shocked to hear that they 5 MS. GROSSMAN: 6 THE COURT: What do you think they stipulated to MR. MOORE: That the entirety of the transcript would 7 II again? 8 9 II be admitted -- 10 MS. GROSSMAN: 11 MR. MOORE: 12 II THE COURT: II I've looked at it. MS. BORCHETTA: 18 THE COURT: II It's very heavily redacted. 17 19 Your Honor, it's the redacted version of the transcript that's Exhibit 299. 15 16 With respect to the city having notice of MS. BORCHETTA: II It was all for impeachment. the entirety of the transcript. 13 14 That's definitely not what -- It's the entirety of that. Where is this stipulation? Is it in e-mails or letters? MS. BORCHETTA: 20 Your Honor, during the pre-- the 21 II conference that we had right before the trial began about 22 II various objections that the city had to our documents. 23 II court will remember, we had a break where we were able to talk. THE COURT: 24 25 That's right. You said we have nothing II further. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) As the 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 114 of 235 D3m9flo3 Marino - redirect 1 MS. BORCHETTA: Yes. 942 We spoke with the city and 2 II agreed to make additional redactions to Exhibit 299 based on 3 II the city's representation that they would agree to stipulate 4 II that the city had notice on the date of the interview of the 5 II entirety of the unredacted contents of that interview. 6 MS. GROSSMAN: 7 THE COURT: 8 II problem. 9 II That is not what was agreed to. Well I wasn't there. This is a real What am I supposed to do, figure out who said what and who I believe? I don't want to do that. 10 Who were you negotiating with? 11 MS. BORCHETTA: 12 II Your Honor, I spoke with Ms. Grossman about this. 13 THE COURT: 14 The city, obviously, had notice of anything in the 15 That's a very awkward thing. transcript because as you said the city was it's a city 16 II transcript. 17 II 18 II moment in time. 19 II when I said I wouldn't take it because I usually don't take if 20 II for impeachment. 21 22 The city was there. limited purpose then of notice, what the city knew at that It's a different purpose than a moment ago MS. GROSSMAN: II Just so that the court notes, that this is an ongoing matter, and it's related to another proceeding. THE COURT: 23 So I'll take it for the Be it as it may, I'm only taking it for 24 II the limited purpose of notice; just what they're saying, as of 25 II a certain date, the date of the transcript which is August 30, SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 '· D3m9flo3 Filed 05/30/13 Page 115 of 235 9 43 Marino - redirect 1 II 2010, the city knew whatever it is in there that i t says, 2 II the redacted transcript. 3 4 MS. GROSSMAN: II THE COURT: II So there is no need to actually offer the transcript. 5 6 We would stipulate to that. in of. I have to know what it is they had notice It's in the transcript. 7 MS. GROSSMAN: 8 THE COURT: No. What was just discussed. It's not just those questions and 9 II answers. 10 II they say makes up the notice. 11 II purpose. 12 II about impeachment. 13 II guess so. 14 II that limited purpose. 15 II Are we done with the witness? 16 II (Plaintiffs' Exhibit 299 received in evidence) It's everything in the unredacted transcript that I have to take it for that It's completely different than the earlier argument Okay. I wouldn't have taken that. All right. 17 THE COURT: 18 MS. PUBLICKER: 19 THE COURT: But anyway. I So it's received as redacted for Recross. Actually just briefly. Whatever it is. 20 II RECROSS EXAMINATION 21 II BY MS. PUBLICKER: 22 II Q. 23 II Mr. Moore's statements about the arbitrator's decision? 24 II A. 25 II quota, was suffering a police officer to -- causing a police Chief Marino, what did you mean by yes and no to Reading the quota law what made a quota a quota, SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 an illegal Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 Filed 05/30/13 Page 116 of 235 D3m9flo3 Marino - recross ' 944 1 officer to suffer a loss for failure to meet suddenly required 2 amount of moving or parking summonses within a specified 3 timeframe. 4 makes it illegal. 5 6 That's what makes a quota a quota. None of the transfers were rescinded. evaluations were changed. 7 That's what None of the Nothing happened as a result. So because the arbitrator felt that while I set 8 numbers -- I did set specific numbers, and I did, and I 9 admitted that -- that nobody was punished or suffered any loss 10 as a result failure to meet those numbers or stating a quota 11 law. 12 effort. But rather it was on a conglomeration of their entire 13 So the transfers were upheld. No evaluation was 14 changed. 15 the judge said don't set numbers anymore. 16 17 And the legal bureau put something out right afterwards, or deputy commissioner -- 18 19 MR. MOORE: I'm going to object to what the legal bureau did, Judge. 20 21 Nothing happened as a result other than the fact that THE WITNESS: information. Maybe the deputy commissioner of public I'm sorry, counselor. 22 MR. MOORE: 23 THE WITNESS: All right. Fine. That they felt that the fact that 24 nothing was taken back, it kind of flew in the face of illegal 25 quotas. If it was illegal, something would have been remedied. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:08-cv-01 034-SAS-HBP Document 288 c Filed 05/30/13 Page 117 of 235 9 45 Marino - recross D3m9flo3 1 II 2 II performance standard or they wouldn't be doing their job. It wasn't. And that commanders are expected to set a MS. PUBLICKER: 3 Thank you, Chief Marino. 4 II REDIRECT EXAMINATION 5 II BY MR. MOORE: 6 II 7 II testimony from you and several police officers, correct? 8 II A. Yes, 9 II And the arbitrator found that there was a quota in the 75th Q. Q. Not to beat a dead horse. But the arbitrator heard the sir. 10 II precinct, yes or no? 11 II A. But nobody was punished 12 II The arbitrator found Q. 13 THE COURT: 14 THE WITNESS: 15 THE COURT: Yes or no. Yes. We're done. 16 II 17 Thank you. II don't want to lose the time. I know we won't do much of the next witness but I 18 MR. CHARNEY: 19 THE COURT: I believe it's Captain Mascol. We aren't going to get more than five 20 II minutes, but we'll do it. 21 II 22 II called as a witness by the Plaintiffs, 23 II having been duly sworn, testified as follows: 24 II RAFAEL MASCOL, (Continued on next page) 25 SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?