Schoolcraft v. The City Of New York et al

Filing 500

DECLARATION of Alan H. Scheiner in Support re: 498 MOTION in Limine To Preclude Plaintiff From Offering Certain Evidence at Trial.. Document filed by Christopher Broschart(Tax Id. 915354 in his official capacity), Christopher Broschart(Tax Id. 915354 Individually), Kurt Duncan(Shield No. 2483, Individually), Kurt Duncan(Shield No. 2483 in his official capacity), William Gough(Tax Id. 919124, Individually), William Gough(Tax Id. 919124, in his Official Capacity), Elise Hanlon(in her official capacity as a lieutenant with the New York City Fire Department), Elise Hanlon(individually), Shantel James(Shield No. 3004 in his official capacity), Shantel James(Shield No. 3004 Individually), Theodore Lauterborn(Tax Id. 897840 in his official capacity), Theodore Lauterborn(Tax Id. 897840, Individually), Michael Marino, Michael Marino, Gerald Nelson(Assistant Chief Patrol Borough Brooklyn North, Tax Id. 912370 in his official capacity), Gerald Nelson(Assistant Chief Patrol Borough Brooklyn North, Tax Id. 912370, Individually), Frederick Sawyer(Shield No. 2576 in his official capacity), Frederick Sawyer(Shield No. 2576, Individually), The City Of New York. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G (Under Seal), # 8 Exhibit PTX 4, 6, 13, 16, 18, 22, 25, 26, 29, 30, 33, 34, 35, 40, 42, 46, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 57, 59, 60, 62, 64, 65, 66, 72, 84, 93, 95, 306, 308, 309, 314, 316, 400, 401, 402, 403, 406, 407, 408, 409, 420, 421, 426, 427 (Under Seal), # 9 Exhibit PTX 79, # 10 Exhibit PTX 81 (Part 1 of 2), # 11 Exhibit PTX 81 (Part 2 of 2), # 12 Exhibit PTX 404, # 13 Exhibit PTX 410, # 14 Exhibit PTX 411)(Thadani, Kavin)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT F 1 3ffilffiflt-l;i:'ü" t UNTTED STATES DTSTRTCT COURT SOUTHËRN D]STRTCT OT NEW YORK ---*x 2 ADRIAN SCHOOLCRAF'T, 3 PLATNTÏ FFI 4 Case No.: 10cTV 6005 (RT/üs) -against- 5 6 7 I 9 1CI 11" L2 13 I4 l_5 I6 L7 THE CITY OT' NEI/ü YORK, ET AL/ DEPUTY CHTEF MTCHAEL MARINO TAX rD 87322Q, ÏNDÏVIÐUALLY AND rN HrS OrrrCrAL CÄPACTTY, ASSTSTANT CHIEF PATROL BCIROUGH BROOKLYN NORTH, GERALD NELSON/ TAX TD 9L23"101 TNDTVTÐUALLY AND TN HÏS OFFICÏAL cApAcrTY, DEPUTY TNSPECTOR STEVEN MAURTELLO ?AX IÞ 8951"17, TNDTVTDUALLY AND IN HIS OTT'TCTAL CAPACTTY, CAPTAIN THEODORE LAUTERBORN, ?AX TD 89784A, INDTVTDUALLY AND TN HTS OFTICÏAL CAPACTTY, I,TEUTENANT !ÛILLTAM GOUGH, TAX TD 9T9I24, TNDTVIDUALLY AND TN HTS OTFICT.AI CAPAC]TY, SERGEANT FRflDERICK SAVüYER, SHTELD NUMBKR 2576, TNDTVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFTCIAL CAPACTTY, SERGEANT KURT DUNCAN, SHTELD 2483, INDTVTDUALLY AND TN HTS OFTTCTAL CAPACTTYI LTEUTENANT CHRISTOPHER BROSCHART TAX TD 9].5354, INDTVTDUALLY AND ]N HTS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, L]EUTENANT TIMOTHY CAUGHEY, TAX ÏD 885374, TNDIVIDUAT,LY AND TN HTS OFTTCIAL CAPACTTY, SERGEANT SHANTEL JAMES, SHTELD NO, 3OO4 AND PCI'S JOHN DOE 1-50 INDIVIDUALLY AND IN THEIR OFFTCIAL CAPACITTES, JAMAICA HOSPTTAL MSDTCAI CENTER, DR. ISAK TSAKOV/ TNDIVTDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFTCIALLY CAPACTTY, DR. L]LIAN ALDANA.BERN]ER, INDIV]DUALLY AND TN HER OTFTÇTAL CAPACITY AND JAMAICA HOSPTTAL MEDTCAL CENTER EMPLOYEES JOHN DOE 1*50 INDIVTDUALLY AND TN THETR OTF]CTAL CAPACTTIBS (THE NAME JOHN DOE BEING FTCTTTTOUS, AS THE TRUE NAMES ARE PRESENTÏ,Y UNKNOI/üN) , LB DEFENDANTS. 19 *----*---*x 20 21 DAIE: June 5, 20L4 22 TTME: L0:16 A.M 23 24 (DEPOSTTION OT JOSNPH FERRARA. ) 25 DTAMOND REPORTTNG (7LS) 624q20A infoßdiamondreporting.com 1" 11 .]OSNPH FËRRARA 1 go to the next job, because there's pressure from the COs 5 in regards to response time, fo: how long does it take a cop to get to another job. But. if an officer dj.d ask a vÍct.irn on the scene A. are you sure i.t was a pi.pe or a bat, do you beljeve th¿t o would be an inappropriate questi.on? ¿, 3 I A. 7 No, that would be aPProPriate. 18 is So, your -- your problem with this is A. calling 1at-er? Yes. The NYPD teachesl it-s of ficers Lo inLeracL. A, with the commr:nity on various clifferent l.evels and 1f an offícer goes to a job and the person says they got hit with a bat and robbad, 'Lhey got hif" wit.h a bat ancl robbed ancl the offícer puts that down. f donrt know why later on there would be further questi-ons in regards to that compl,aint. The only furt.her quest.ion in my feeling and real.-ly departmentallywise is t,haL t.hal- wíll go to the squad and a detective assigned to that cåse would i.nvestígate t9 t.hat crime. I 9 1,0 11 72 L3 t4 1,6 t7 A. 20 Vüho do you believe was responsible for LhÌs ¿¿ of crime complaínts? MR. SMIïH: Objection to 23 MR. KRETZ: Objection. 2t downg::ading A. 24 25 Who fo::m. actua.l.ly di.d il or who garre the orders lo do ir? DTAMONI] REPORTTNG (718) 624-720A infoGdjamond.repo,rting.com 77 78 JOSEPH TIIRRARA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 L0 LL 1,2 A. A. Both. ít fell on crime they worked harld in irancl with t-he Well, T believe iu analysi-s people because i.t office.r in -- because crime analysis put together all the complaints into a sysl-em and h¡as able lo tally all the crimes up for the seven majors. 5o they worked hand in hancj with the CO j.n al..l the precincts thal's the way jt was. commandíng In the 81 precinct it wor¡ld be Df MaurÍello, you know, giving t-he orclers t.o look at cerLain crimes. He at roll calls or COs' meeti.ngs would even sây it at the tirat l-he desk off icers have Lo sl-art looking at special compJ.aint .reports that come in because the oesk office:: is 2A to review the complaint reporLs, but it went on in Lhe -- in the l-03. f t wenl on Ín t.he¡ in t,he 44. Ït was juat. a general practi'ce for commanding officers to try to limj..t the amount of numbers that they have because the way the job is if a CO has a rise in numbers and r.h€y want to get promcf,ed thåt will stop them from getting promoted. Do you believe that t.his downgrading of cri.ne 0. 2)" compl.ainLs was of I4 15 16 L7 1B L9 2?. 23 ¿t+ ZJ supposecl A. felt it 0. A, ficial misconduct? I dontt know if it was official misconduct. I was misconduct. Did you ever repcrt th:s misconducL 1-o anyone? No. DIAMOND REPORTTNG (718) 624-'120A infoßdiamondreporting'com 78 79 JOSEPH T'ARRARA I .) 3 4 5 7 B 9 10 TL T2 13 1A .t. a 1.5 Why not? A. Because i.f you -- if you go around report.inq /{. stuff about your fellow wor:kers or your commanding officer then chances årÊ you're going to geL yourse"lf jammed up there's t.hat -- Lherers a perception in because therers the NYPD to punish people who t.ry to do good stuft sometj.mes. So, I wasnrt looking to get myself jåmmed up by of enemies with anybody or *- you know, T was tryíng to just keep mysel-f out of lrouble and do the right t-hirrg like J'm supposed t-o do. And you believe that this quote, unquote numbe¡s O. game happened because Commissiorler Ke}ly and the commandÍng officers wanted to see crime go down, ::-ight? MR. SMITH: Objection to form. making any kind A. Yes. MR. SMTTI-I: Virhat was 16 the ans!úer to t.hat. questíon? T7 THE WTTNESS: YCS. 1B 23 in you:: e-mail- to Mr. Norinsberg from August 11th yoll stated that lops äre aLso directed to write certain movinç summonses, lheyrre frownecl upon if they issue a brake li.ght, ta"illight, head..l.ight suÍìmons, the cops have to write seab be1t, cell 24 phone gurrìmonses L9 20 21" ôa L¿ 25 0. A. Nclw, Ye again, in you.ìî -- -- s. DTAMOND REPORTING (718 ) 624-72.0A 'inf oßdiamondreport.i ng, 19 com r.93 .TOSEPI'l FNRRARA 4 If a person reports something, especíaIly uniformed member of lhe service, if you're repor;ing somethíng against anot.her uniformed member of the serv"ice, that's supposed to remajn confidential because riqht ar/^/ay 5 now l_ a L 3 6 you're going to have, yot.t know, tension beL,ween t.he officer who reportecl and ** and the -- you know, the t"0 subject. That's just not å fair tactic' it's why people don't reporL, things i.n the NYPD any qui-cker is because of experi ences like t.hi.s, s j"t-uaLions l-ike this I-low do yor: know that ssmeone in IAB was t-he one A'. l-1 who leaked Adrian Schoolcraft,'s name? 1 I I talking in A. t3 T4 Peop1e h/êre O. A. T¿ And what ciid f-hey say? t-he command. i\pparently IAB, f think, calted up lhe TS, 1"5 telephone ewitcl¡board operator, and left a message for 16 School.craft. to cal.l back o:: something, that doesn'l L7 normally happen. Thatrs what T think, you know, thatrs L8 22 L, you know, remember being, yol¡ know, overhearing. So, when individual"s are ca.l.Ied to IAB for a PG 0. hearing, how are they normally notÍfied? I be..i.ieve the fCO gets the phone call. t.o noti.fy A. the subject in the p::ecinct that t,hey got to show up for a 2,3 PG 1,9 20 27 24 25 what. hearing. A. A. And on what do you base My experience being DTAMOND REPORTÏNG thal opinj.on? in fCO's office when T was 41. (718) 6?.4-1zQA info0djamondreporting.com 193 194 .]OSEPH FURRAR/{ t 40 Preci ncl 2 0, 3 4 5 6 7 H I l0 l-1 t2 13 1,.4 Sr:, when yoLl were a desk sergeant or a l-ieutenant on 1-he desk, you never got a call from IAB? I don't believe so. And when Ï No. I don't A. \^ras in IAB as ä sergeant anci a lieutenant the ICOs are the ones we notified when we needed somebody to come down for a PG hear"'i"ng. I¡ûe didn't notify -- we didn't ca.1.1 the person's commåncì anci say, h*y, listen, this is IAB, we need Joe Blow to come down to talk to us, it wasnrt like t.hat, r:ot conf ident ial . An ICO is supposed lo remain confi.dential, lhat-'s what thei,r: duties and responsi.biliti.es are, is they're not supposed tc broadcast to other members of the command hey' Joe Blow got a PG hear ** a notification to come down for a tha t ' s J"6 hearing, that's one of their specific duties, is that t.hey remain confidential wj"lh j"nformat"ion that they al LI possess. 1q '18 l-9 PG A. So, it's your belief that fAB does not call the reç¡ular telephclne swÍtchboard to schedule PGs of officers 2A 21, A ¿L 0 23 llbsolutely. reqarclless of whether they're subject or wi.tness officer? 24 A Yes. 25 v And so, it's your understandinq based on what D]AMOND RËPORTING you (718) 624-'1200 j"nfoßdiamondreporting.com 1,9A 202 JOSEPI{ FERRARA 1 2 t.he 81 Precinct from AprÍl until your surgery lelfs say? A. No. 4 Did you ever discuss the troubles you had had as 0. a result of the things you told us about with Stêve 5 Mauriello? 3 A. I might have. Do yclu have any B 0. A. I A. As one of Lhe attorneys in this cåse responds in 6 1 10 recollection of it? No. saying anything is possible, but I just want to know -- 11 A. I mÍght 12 0. A. -- what it is you reca].l. I might have But you don'c have any recollection? 15 0, A. 1"6 A. So, you don't have any lîecollect,ion of anything 13 T4 11 1B have. No. he migl^rt have said ín response or anything of the sort,? A. No, I really donrt. 21 And you throughout your testimony were t,alking A. and referring to a couple of oifferent types of conduct, officj.al mi.sconduct, ¡nisccnduct or just generally 22 ínappropriate behavior. 1..9 20 t? You've t<¡Id us that you thought., I think lhese 24 were your words, that it was inappropriat,e for MaurielLo 25 refer to Schoolcraft as a raL. DIAMOND REPORTTNG Lo (718) 624-12A0 infoßdiamondreporting.com 242 20"7 .'OSTIPH FARRARA Ts that ** was Lhere one -* more than 1 tv\to 2 recordings that you had search th.rougþ Lo find oub if there 3 was any[hing useful (* only 5 or has it always been that, there were two? A. No, there was two. ?rlhat I was referring r*o by 6 searching, those meetings were an hour and ten minutes 7 each, I had to go Lhrough and listen a ninules worth to see if there was anything that pert"ained. I 10 11 1-o an hour and ten Okay. hlere you ** your purpoñe in making the recordings was to record MaurielLo saying something inappropriate aboul Schoolcraft you le11 Lts, right? A, 12 Â Voc 13 A. And, ser when Norinsberg is asking you for 1-4 j..nformation you don'i recall at that time whether 15 recordings you made for the sole purpose of recording L6 Mar:rie-L.lo L7 cÕntained such inappropriate things? 1B r9 2A 21" 22 24 25 t.he sayjng inapprcpr:iate thi.ngs about, SchoolcrafL A. I wasn't sure exactly what was said. f wasn't sure if he used the word rat. I donrt *- f wâsrrr't sure how he referred to Schoolcrafl-, so I had to go back and look just to see because, Vou know, Lhere's there's multiple ways of referring to peopJ-e and I just dictnrt want to say l\ and i,t was B, so T had t.o go back and review it. Di::ect.ing your attent.iün to pâge L27441 a, Mr, Norinsberg writes to you on August 11, 2010. I wou-Ld DTAMOND REI?ORTING (71.8 ) 62A-7200 infoGcliamondreporting. 2.07 com 2L9 JOSNPH F'ERRARA Mr, Ferrera, how are 1 a He-1"1o, , A Ciood. Thank you you? " 1L I'm gr:ing to ask you a few nore questions. I know it I s been a long day. f.f there's anything about the queslion, the way I ask itr itrs nof cl,ear, Iet me know and Itll try and rephrase it.' okay? A. Yes. Atl right, great. A. You were asked questions earlier about Lhe two recordings that you made at l-he 81 CO meeLings. And you said that those wÊre on Februa.r:y 18, 201-0 and Ap.ril 1, .t.¿ 201-0; j.s that. right,T I "' 5 'l I 9 L0 13 t4 lh )"6 l1 1B 19 A, Yes. I think you said t.hat you were at a meeting, anoLher COst meeting prior to February 18, 2010 and at that a. And rneeting DI Mauriello made A" some statements, right? Yes, And those stalements rel-ated to Schooicraft; is 0, that right'? 20 À Voc 21 0 Can you 22 whatever te1I me how many days, weeks' months or 23 other vray you can measure it. that t,hose sLatements wëre made in relationship to the Februa,ry 1"8, 20L0 meetinq 24 that 25 A you recorded? It probably would have been right before this DTAMOND REFORTÏNG ('718 ) 624-12A0 inf oGdiamondreporting 21,9 . com 220 JOSUP}I FERRARA I February LBth¡ so whatever CO meeting Lhere was before that 2. it probably would have been at that meeting Lhat I first heard it or -- I don't know how --.you know, I don't recall bul it probably would have .I how oft,en he had COs'meetings, 5 been the mosl- recent one befc¡re t.hat.. B Okay. So, sitting here t-odäy iLrs your belief A. that that meeting which prompt.ed you to make t-he recording on February 1"8th happened two or four weeksr approximately, 9 before flebruary i.B, 6 1 20i.0? L0 A. Yeah, probably. 11 A. Do yeu -* MR. T2 0. :_3 Do you Lf;E¡ Objection to form, recalL what Mauriello said at that, 1,4 meeting, t-he one that preceded the February 18, L5 meetlng thãt you did record? T6 21, A. rlust that Schoolcraft's a rat, something to that effect. Sichoolcraft and a rat. I donft remember word for wo::d exactly what was said. Dici Mauriel-Io say in your presence words to the A, effect that he knew that Schoolcraft was a rat or that he had been qiven information ai:out that or anythinç like 22 that l7 tõ L9 20 23 201-0 ? ï t.hink ¿\ 2.4 got a 25 have been heads he sa.i.d someLhi.ng uÞ, but I rea lly prior to those -- DÏAMOND REPORTTNG t.o t.he don ' 1: remember effect that i've and that would those two recordíngs. (718) 62A*7200 infoGdiamondreportinq.corn 220 224 JOSEPI{ FERRARA L Irorked for him. 1 I believe he was Lhe comm¿rndirig off icer of one of the groups in IAB' so lhere was a c.Iose working relationship between de] Pozo and Campisi himself as well as Lhe other chiefs in the bureau. Häd you ever heard of other occasions where COs 0. got a heads up about- invesligaiions that were going on a aL¡c¡trt I A. 2 A T L 6 t"0 b¡as thei.r commands? Yeair, T heard *- I've hea.r:d people talk Lhal a CO given a heads up. 2,1 Wt¡ere -* wirere v{ere you when you heard this? aT was in IAB because there v{as a group 56 CO who A. was -- Captain ** his name slips my mind, but he was the group 56 CO after Lunetta. I thínk he had several invesiigat.ions on him, you know, allegations r:f corruption and misconcÌuct with j.n hi s g.r:oup thal- was against, him and he knew about every single one of bhem. You know. How doe$ somebody find out about j-t if somebody higher up in IAB is not lellíng him? i got a tittle bit jumbled up about your c.areerl 0. Itm sure you covered it, f 'm just not c"lear. T hope you 22 bear wi-th 11 t2 13 14 1s l-6 L7 1.8 t9 20 For how yeårs díd you work at 1a LJ 24 25 me. TAB? I believe all together it was five, I believe it was probably close to three years as å sergeant and maybe A, DIAMOND REPORTING (718) 624*'7200 ínfoßdiamondreporting.com 224 225 JCISEPH FERRARA L two years as a .l.ieuf.enant. Four plus years al-I together, ¿ naybe. 3 J A. Ll 5 6 ",i I Do you recalL any olher: circumstances where COs gol. heacls up other than l-he ones you've mentÌoned today? Just -- nô, that -- lhat's really hl"t' I mean people talk, you know, from group to grorrp people talk about this C0, thaL CO. You know, I mean I canrt say definitely, you know, I know that the group 56 CO definitely got a heads up because my wife worked in group A. 1"9 unlil she retired and she was made aware lhatr VÕu know' there was allegations being made,aqainst t.hat commanding officer, so that I cìefinitely knew because she knew. As far as anyÌ:ody e.lse, I mean t.here I^/âs ålways word of -- you know, there v,¡as aLways word t-hat oh, yeah, IAB ii.pped aff so and so anrl you know, because the job -the job t.ries to p::otect who they l-ike, YOU krlow. There åre there are some Cos who get hit for fudgi.ng numbers and they geL transferred. T'here are some COs who hil for fudging numbers and they get t-o1.d you got to leave' yôu got ?,t to retire. 1't t? the -* the CO rn group 56 before Capiain Lunetta was this woman CapLain Ferman, she was Af rícan*American wornan, she got caught fr.idgl"ng nr:mbers 24 which 1aì 1.1 T2 L3 14 15 1"6 )"7 18 LL 22 25 56 Um, tied in1-o the whole Brohenny thing that we spoke about earlier with Uhe computer mi.suse that he ran a nephew v\¡as DIAMOND REPORTlNG (718) 624-120A 1nfoßcliamondreporLing.com 225 250 JOSEFH FERRARA l" 2 and lieutenant, f was a nobody Ín that bureau. 0. lhank you. 3 TllE VIDEOGRAPHER: AnYt,hing else? 4 MS. PUBLTCKER METTHAM: THE VIDEOGRAPHTR: NO. This concl"udes today's 6 deposition of Joseph Ferrera' !üe are now off the 7 record at 4:53 P'm. (lihereupon, at I I 4¡ 53 P .M. , the Examination of t,his Wítnese was concluded.) r.0 LT .JOSEFH FER,RARA T2 t< T4 '1 ( Subscribed.and sì^rorn to before this day of me 20 1.6 L7 NOTARY PUBLTC 18 19 20 2L 22 23 ¿.1 25 DTAMOND REPORTING {718) 624'7200 infoßdiamondreporting.com 25A

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?