The New York Times Company et al v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

Filing 24

CLERK'S JUDGMENT That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated November 7, 2011, plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is denied, and defendants motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is granted. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 11/8/11) (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Right to Appeal)(dt)

Download PDF
USDCSDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC#: / DATE FILED: rlff/ti ------------------------------------------------------------)( THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY and CHARLES SAVAGE, Plaintiffs, 10 CIVIL 7920 (RPP) JUDGMENT -againstFEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Defendant. -----------------------------------------------------------)( Plaintiffs having moved for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56, and defendant having cross-moved for summary judgment and to dismiss this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), and the matter having come before the Honorable Robert P. Patterson, United States District Judge, and the Court, on November 7, 2011, having rendered its Opinion and Order denying plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, and granting defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, it is, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated November 7, 2011, plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment is denied, and defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is granted. Dated: New York, New York November 8, 2011 BY: Deputylcu~rk I ~ ............/ TIIJS D0CUMENT WAS ENTERED 0~ ll iL DOCKET ON -----

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?