Windsor v. The United States Of America
Filing
12
MOTION to Intervene a party defendant in this matter for the limited purpose of litigating the constitutionality of Section III of the Defense of Marriage Act, Pub. L. No. 104-199, 110 Stat. 2419 (Sept. 21, 1996), codified at 1 U.S.C. § 7.. Document filed by Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. House of Representatives. (Attachments: # 1 proposed order, # 2 Certificate of Service)(Clement, Paul)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
__________________________________________
)
EDITH SCHLAIN WINDSOR, in her
)
capacity as Executor of the Estate of THEA
)
CLARA SPYER,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
) Case No. 1:10-cv-8435 (BSJ) (JCF)
vs.
) ECF Case
)
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
)
)
Defendant.
)
__________________________________________)
[PROPOSED] ORDER
UPON CONSIDERATION OF the Unopposed Motion of the Bipartisan Legal Advisory
Group of the U.S. House of Representatives to Intervene for a Limited Purpose (“Motion”), and
the entire record herein, it is by the Court this ____ day of April 2011 ORDERED
That the Motion is GRANTED for all the reasons set forth in the Memorandum of Points
and Authorities filed in support of the Motion. It is further ORDERED
That the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group of the U.S. House of Representatives be and
hereby is authorized to participate as a party defendant in this matter for the limited purpose of
litigating the constitutionality of Section III of the Defense of Marriage Act, Pub. L. No. 104199, 110 Stat. 2419 (Sept. 21, 1996), codified at 1 U.S.C. § 7.
______________________________
James C. Francis, U.S. Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?